Liu Xi, Zhong Guanghong, Gu Hongli, Wen Yangchun, Zhong Xiaojing, Zhang Jia, Xie Ying
Department of Neurology, Heyuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Heyuan, China.
Department of Neurology, Heyuan People's Hospital, Heyuan, China.
Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 3;16:1553459. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1553459. eCollection 2025.
Patients with symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery stenosis not only experience a first stroke event, but also have a high risk of recurrent stroke. Even though interventional techniques have been widely used in the treatment of cerebral infarction, the therapeutic efficacy for symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery stenosis patients are not superior to that achieved with simple drug therapy. However, the optimal choice of drugs and the duration of their use in a pure drug regimen remain unclear.
This retrospective study analyzed data from Heyuan People's Hospital (2021-2023) on patients with vertebrobasilar artery stenosis. Patients were grouped by treatment duration (30/90 days ticagrelor vs. 90 days clopidogrel), all receiving aspirin. Outcomes included ischemic events, bleeding, and complications. SPSS version 22.0 was employed for statistical analysis.
This study included 217 patients with symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery stenosis. Clinical features and outcomes of efficacy and safety analyses were conducted. No significant differences in baseline data or safety outcomes were found. However, a significant difference in endpoint events was observed within 90 days for specific subgroups of symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis and CYP2C19 gene deletion.
For patients with symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery stenosis, the ticagrelor plus aspirin regimen may provide an alternative therapeutic option to the aspirin plus clopidogrel bisulfate regimen. Furthermore, this regimen may represent a favored treatment choice for specific patient subpopulations.
有症状的椎基底动脉狭窄患者不仅会经历首次中风事件,而且复发中风的风险也很高。尽管介入技术已广泛用于脑梗死的治疗,但对有症状的椎基底动脉狭窄患者的治疗效果并不优于单纯药物治疗。然而,在单纯药物治疗方案中,药物的最佳选择及其使用持续时间仍不明确。
这项回顾性研究分析了河源市人民医院(2021 - 2023年)椎基底动脉狭窄患者的数据。患者按治疗持续时间分组(替格瑞洛治疗30/90天与氯吡格雷治疗90天),均接受阿司匹林治疗。结局包括缺血事件、出血和并发症。采用SPSS 22.0版进行统计分析。
本研究纳入了217例有症状的椎基底动脉狭窄患者。对临床特征以及疗效和安全性分析的结果进行了评估。在基线数据或安全性结局方面未发现显著差异。然而,在90天内,有症状的颅内椎基底动脉狭窄特定亚组和CYP2C19基因缺失患者的终点事件存在显著差异。
对于有症状的椎基底动脉狭窄患者,替格瑞洛加阿司匹林方案可能为阿司匹林加硫酸氢氯吡格雷方案提供一种替代治疗选择。此外,该方案可能是特定患者亚群的首选治疗方案。