• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善儿科急诊科患者护理体验:一项系统综述

Improving patient care experience in the pediatric emergency department: a systematic review.

作者信息

Abram Evan, Dhaliwal Bhavan, Oketola Banke, Badran Hoda, Gangwani Apoorva, Eleonu Peace, Costello Carrie, Tam Clara, Klassen Terry P, Doyle Elisabete, Aregbesola Alex

机构信息

The Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

出版信息

CJEM. 2025 Apr 18. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00897-3.

DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00897-3
PMID:40249564
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of the project was to summarize existing evidence on patient experiences in pediatric emergency departments (EDs). The secondary objectives were to characterize patient care experience in pediatric EDs, identify barriers to optimal patient care in pediatric EDs, and identify equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) principles influencing pediatric emergency care.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of cohort, cross-sectional, and controlled clinical studies on children's (≤ 21 years) experience in the pediatric ED. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycInfo (Ovid), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Ovid), CENTRAL (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCO) from inception until September 7, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened articles for primary outcomes involving any health care outcome or health care utilization, along with secondary outcomes of EDI factors influencing patient care. Data were obtained from included studies using narrative and descriptive analysis. The process was strengthened by input from patients, families, and providers on the Manitoba Emergency Advisory Committee, who proposed additional areas for consideration.

RESULTS

Six articles were included, assessing 12 experiences. All studies were from high-volume centers. The primary outcome data indicated an overall satisfaction being rated positively, with satisfaction levels exceeding 70% despite lower ratings in privacy, communication, and waiting areas. Wait times and speed of care were significantly correlated with satisfaction (r = -0.48, P < 0.01 and r = 0.38, P < 0.01, respectively), noting wait times and privacy as barriers to care. The EDI factor impacting patient experience was race, showing decreased scores for privacy and patient voice for those identifying as non-white.

CONCLUSIONS

Even with a high overall satisfaction in the pediatric EDs, aspects influencing the experience can be improved. Wait times, waiting areas, privacy and EDI factor such as race should be addressed to help overcome barriers and improve the care patients receive.

摘要

目的

该项目的主要目标是总结关于儿科急诊科患者体验的现有证据。次要目标是描述儿科急诊科的患者护理体验,确定儿科急诊科提供最佳患者护理的障碍,并确定影响儿科急诊护理的公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)原则。

方法

我们对关于儿童(≤21岁)在儿科急诊科体验的队列研究、横断面研究和对照临床研究进行了系统综述。我们检索了MEDLINE(Ovid)、Embase(Ovid)、PsycInfo(Ovid)、Cochrane系统评价数据库(Ovid)、CENTRAL(Ovid)和CINAHL(EBSCO),检索时间从各数据库建库至2023年9月7日。两名评审员独立筛选文章,以获取涉及任何医疗保健结果或医疗保健利用情况的主要结果,以及影响患者护理的EDI因素的次要结果。使用叙述性和描述性分析从纳入的研究中获取数据。曼尼托巴省急诊咨询委员会的患者、家属和提供者提供了意见,加强了这一过程,他们提出了其他需要考虑的领域。

结果

纳入了6篇文章,评估了12种体验。所有研究均来自大型中心。主要结果数据表明总体满意度得到了积极评价,尽管在隐私、沟通和候诊区的评分较低,但满意度仍超过70%。等待时间和护理速度与满意度显著相关(分别为r = -0.48,P < 0.01和r = 0.38,P < 0.01),指出等待时间和隐私是护理的障碍。影响患者体验的EDI因素是种族,对于那些自认为是非白人的患者,隐私和患者话语权得分较低。

结论

即使儿科急诊科总体满意度较高,影响体验的各个方面仍可得到改善。应解决等待时间、候诊区、隐私以及种族等EDI因素,以帮助克服障碍,改善患者接受的护理。

相似文献

1
Improving patient care experience in the pediatric emergency department: a systematic review.改善儿科急诊科患者护理体验:一项系统综述
CJEM. 2025 Apr 18. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00897-3.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Systematic review and validation of prediction rules for identifying children with serious infections in emergency departments and urgent-access primary care.系统评价和验证预测规则,以识别急诊科和紧急初级保健中严重感染的儿童。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(15):1-100. doi: 10.3310/hta16150.
4
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
5
Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments.在医院急诊科提供非紧急护理的初级保健专业人员。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD002097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002097.pub3.
6
Family-centred care for hospitalised children aged 0-12 years.以家庭为中心的0至12岁住院儿童护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004811. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004811.pub3.
7
Delayed antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory infections.呼吸道感染的延迟抗生素处方
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 7;9(9):CD004417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub5.
8
Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments.在医院急诊科提供非紧急护理的基层医疗专业人员。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 13;2(2):CD002097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002097.pub4.
9
Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses.利用手机短信促进慢性病自我管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007459.pub2.
10
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A national survey of children's experiences and needs when attending Canadian pediatric emergency departments.一项针对加拿大儿科急诊就诊儿童体验和需求的全国性调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0305562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305562. eCollection 2024.
2
Co-designing discharge communication interventions for mental health visits to the pediatric emergency department: a mixed-methods study.共同设计针对儿科急诊科心理健康就诊的出院沟通干预措施:一项混合方法研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 21;10(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00594-y.
3
Research Priorities for Pediatric Emergency Care to Address Disparities by Race, Ethnicity, and Language.
儿科急诊护理研究重点,以解决种族、民族和语言差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2343791. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43791.
4
Communication between healthcare providers and communicatively-vulnerable patients with associated health outcomes: A scoping review of knowledge syntheses.医疗保健提供者与沟通能力脆弱的患者之间的沟通及其相关健康结果:知识综合的范围综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Feb;119:108040. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108040. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Emergency Department Diagnostic Imaging at US Children's Hospitals, 2016-2019.2016-2019 年美国儿童医院急诊科诊断影像学的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033710. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33710.
7
No clear choice between Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies to assess methodological quality in cross-sectional studies of health-related quality of life and breast cancer.在评估健康相关生命质量和乳腺癌的横断面研究的方法学质量时,Newcastle-Ottawa Scale 和 Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies 之间没有明显的选择。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;120:94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.013. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
8
Early unplanned return visits to a pediatric emergency department in Israel.以色列儿科急诊科的早期非计划复诊情况。
Pediatr Int. 2019 Nov;61(11):1081-1085. doi: 10.1111/ped.14011.
9
Discharge communication practices in pediatric emergency care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.儿科急诊中出院沟通实践:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 3;8(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0995-7.
10
Assessment of Patient-Centered Approaches to Collect Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Information in the Emergency Department: The EQUALITY Study.评估急诊科以患者为中心的方法收集性取向和性别认同信息:EQUALITY 研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e186506. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6506.