Hart Graeme K, Martin Lorelle, Todd Julia, Hosking Nicole
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Apr 17;14(2):e002976. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002976.
Clinical communication failures result in errors, misdiagnosis, inappropriate treatment and poor care. Communication errors contribute to sentinel events and are an underlying factor in healthcare system issues.Formal clinical communication (FCC) tools, such as ISBAR (Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment, Response/Recommendation), improve patient outcomes. FCC governance is focused on electronic medical records (EMRs); however, much informal clinical communication (ICC) occurs outside of the EMR.ICC involves disparate platforms including pagers, SMS texts, encrypted messaging apps, phones and local radio networks. Documentation of ICC in the clinical record is low quality and not easily or routinely audited.
In 2019, our institution commenced a clinical governance assessment of ICC processes against version 2, Australian National Accreditation Standards for clinical communications. Process mapping of ICC indicated a paucity of relevant policy and procedures to govern ICC practices, with highly variable and overly complex processes.
To document the technology used in informal communication between clinical and/or administrative staff.To document the self-perceived impact on staff of current communications methods.To document the self-perceived potential efficiency and safety impact of current communications methods.To identify key factors for consideration in organisation-wide informal clinical communication improvement.
Multidisciplinary online staff cross-sectional survey using Microsoft Forms.
115 self-selected clinical and administrative staff completed the survey. Multiple communication channels are used for ICC. Respondents noted high levels of frustration, delay, interruption and inefficiency. Desired communication improvements and use considerations were identified.
There are gaps in governance standards for ICC. Sequential additions to technology platforms contribute to a high-risk communications environment. Staff perceptions of inefficiency, delay, frustration and a high level of patient safety risk were consistent across professions. This work informed the requirements for a subsequent development of an enterprise platform dedicated to improving ICC.
临床沟通失误会导致错误、误诊、不恰当的治疗以及护理质量不佳。沟通错误会引发重大不良事件,并且是医疗系统问题的一个潜在因素。正式临床沟通(FCC)工具,如ISBAR(识别、情况、背景、评估、回应/建议),可改善患者预后。FCC管理主要关注电子病历(EMR);然而,大量的非正式临床沟通(ICC)发生在EMR之外。ICC涉及多种不同的平台,包括传呼机、短信、加密通讯应用程序、电话和本地无线电网络。临床记录中ICC的文档质量较低,不易于或无法常规进行审核。
2019年,我们机构开始依据澳大利亚临床沟通国家认可标准第2版对ICC流程进行临床管理评估。ICC的流程映射显示,缺乏管理ICC实践的相关政策和程序,流程高度可变且过于复杂。
记录临床和/或行政人员之间非正式沟通所使用的技术。记录当前沟通方式对员工的自我感知影响。记录当前沟通方式对效率和安全的自我感知潜在影响。确定在全组织范围内改善非正式临床沟通时需要考虑的关键因素。
使用微软表单进行多学科在线员工横断面调查。
115名自行选择的临床和行政人员完成了调查。ICC使用多种沟通渠道。受访者指出存在高度的挫败感、延误、干扰和低效率问题。确定了期望的沟通改进措施和使用注意事项。
ICC的管理标准存在差距。技术平台的相继添加导致了高风险的沟通环境。不同专业的员工对低效率、延误、挫败感以及高患者安全风险的看法是一致的。这项工作为后续开发致力于改善ICC的企业平台提供了需求依据。