• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚热带丘陵地区河流水质对景观特征的响应

Response of river water quality to landscape features in a subtropical hilly region.

作者信息

Li Biao, Huang Xiaolei, Zhong Qiang, Wu Xiuxiu

机构信息

National Engineering Laboratory for Applied Technology of Forestry & Ecology in Southern China, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, China.

College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, 410004, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 19;15(1):13528. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98575-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-98575-y
PMID:40253545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12009390/
Abstract

Landscape features have a profound impact on river water quality. However, its impact in subtropical hilly region is unclear. Here, water quality data from 15 catchments were obtained based on a typical subtropical hilly area, the upper Ganjiang River basin. The landscape features in the catchment and buffer zone were calculated, and its effects on river water quality were investigated using redundancy analysis (RDA) and multiple linear regression (MLR) model. Catchment landscape features were found to better explain overall water quality changes compared to buffer zone, and landscape features were found to explain water quality changes more in winter than in summer. Moreover, within the buffer zone, the percentage of grassland had the greatest impact on winter water quality (72.8%), while at the catchment scale, the aggregation index (AI) of grassland contributed the most to changes in winter water quality (31.6%). Nonparametric change-point analysis (nCPA) was used to identify thresholds of landscape features that lead to abrupt changes in water quality. It was found that river water quality can be improved when the percentage of grassland > 0.193%, the largest patch index (LPI) of forest > 7.48% at the buffer zone or the percentage of impervious surfaces < 2.92%, the AI of forest > 98.6% at the catchment scale. This study demonstrated the pivotal role in enhancing river water quality by implementing informed and effective landscape planning for conservation implementation.

摘要

景观特征对河流水质有深远影响。然而,其在亚热带丘陵地区的影响尚不清楚。在此,基于典型的亚热带丘陵地区——赣江上游流域,获取了15个集水区的水质数据。计算了集水区和缓冲区内的景观特征,并使用冗余分析(RDA)和多元线性回归(MLR)模型研究了其对河流水质的影响。结果发现,与缓冲区相比,集水区景观特征能更好地解释整体水质变化,且景观特征对冬季水质变化的解释力大于夏季。此外,在缓冲区内,草地比例对冬季水质影响最大(72.8%),而在集水区尺度上,草地的聚集度指数(AI)对冬季水质变化贡献最大(31.6%)。采用非参数变点分析(nCPA)来确定导致水质突变的景观特征阈值。结果发现,当草地比例>0.193%、缓冲区森林的最大斑块指数(LPI)>7.48%或不透水表面比例<2.92%、集水区尺度森林的AI>98.6%时,河流水质可得到改善。本研究表明,通过实施明智且有效的景观规划以进行保护,在提升河流水质方面具有关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12009390/2b0346448527/41598_2025_98575_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12009390/2129707a0c3e/41598_2025_98575_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12009390/9702f6b548cb/41598_2025_98575_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12009390/a96ac0710e86/41598_2025_98575_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12009390/2b0346448527/41598_2025_98575_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12009390/2129707a0c3e/41598_2025_98575_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12009390/9702f6b548cb/41598_2025_98575_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12009390/a96ac0710e86/41598_2025_98575_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12009390/2b0346448527/41598_2025_98575_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Response of river water quality to landscape features in a subtropical hilly region.亚热带丘陵地区河流水质对景观特征的响应
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 19;15(1):13528. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98575-y.
2
The spatial scale and threshold effects of the relationship between landscape metrics and water quality in the Hutuo River Basin.滹沱河流域景观指标与水质关系的空间尺度及阈值效应
J Environ Manage. 2024 Dec;372:123361. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123361. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
3
[Impact of land use pattern on water quality under different riparian buffer zone scales in Gaya River Basin, Northeast China].[中国东北嘎呀河流域不同河岸缓冲带尺度下土地利用格局对水质的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2023 Dec;34(12):3203-3213. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202312.026.
4
Significant differences in optimal riparian buffer zone on water quality between different segments within the same river.同一条河流不同河段在水质方面的最佳河岸缓冲带存在显著差异。
J Environ Manage. 2025 May;381:125306. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125306. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
5
Spatial scale effects of landscape metrics on stream water quality and their seasonal changes.景观格局指数对河流水质的空间尺度效应及其季节变化。
Water Res. 2021 Mar 1;191:116811. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116811. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
[Spatial scale effects of landscape patterns on non-point source pollution: A case study of Taizi River Basin in Northeast China].景观格局对非点源污染的空间尺度效应:以中国东北太子河流域为例
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Apr 18;35(4):1112-1122. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202404.022.
7
Influences of landscape pattern on water quality at multiple scales in an agricultural basin of western China.中国西部农业流域多尺度景观格局对水质的影响
Environ Pollut. 2023 Feb 15;319:120986. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120986. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
8
Enhancing river water quality in different seasons through management of landscape patterns at various spatial scales.
J Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;373:123653. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123653. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
9
Response of Water Quality to Land Use and Landscape Pattern in the Ganjiang River Watershed.
Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;75(1):155-166. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-02060-7. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
10
[Water Quality Response to Landscape Pattern at Different Spatial Scales in Baihe River in the Upper Reaches of the Miyun Reservoir].[密云水库上游白河不同空间尺度下景观格局对水质的响应]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Nov 8;41(11):4895-4904. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202003250.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of landscape changes on water quality: A global meta-analysis.景观变化对水质的影响:全球荟萃分析。
Water Res. 2024 Aug 15;260:121946. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121946. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
Climate and land use shape the water balance and water quality in selected European lakes.气候和土地利用塑造了欧洲部分湖泊的水平衡和水质。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 5;14(1):8049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58401-3.
3
A triple increase in global river basins with water scarcity due to future pollution.由于未来的污染,全球面临水资源短缺的河流流域数量将增加两倍。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 6;15(1):880. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44947-3.
4
Influences of landscape pattern on water quality at multiple scales in an agricultural basin of western China.中国西部农业流域多尺度景观格局对水质的影响
Environ Pollut. 2023 Feb 15;319:120986. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120986. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
5
Effects of landscape conservation on the ecohydrological and water quality functions and services and their driving factors.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 25;861:160695. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160695. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
6
Managing landscape patterns at the riparian zone and sub-basin scale is equally important for water quality protection.在河岸带和子流域尺度上管理景观格局对于水质保护同样重要。
Water Res. 2023 Feb 1;229:119280. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119280. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
7
Protecting local water quality has global benefits.保护当地水质具有全球效益。
Nat Commun. 2021 May 11;12(1):2709. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22836-3.
8
Spatial scale effects of landscape metrics on stream water quality and their seasonal changes.景观格局指数对河流水质的空间尺度效应及其季节变化。
Water Res. 2021 Mar 1;191:116811. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116811. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
9
Outsized nutrient contributions from small tributaries to a Great Lake.小支流对大湖的巨大养分贡献。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 10;117(45):28175-28182. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001376117. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
10
Multiscale land use impacts on water quality: Assessment, planning, and future perspectives in Brazil.多尺度土地利用对水质的影响:巴西的评估、规划和未来展望。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Sep 15;270:110879. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110879. Epub 2020 Jun 12.