• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Discovery 710正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描重建参数的优化

Optimization of Reconstruction Parameters for Discovery 710 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.

作者信息

Mohymen Ahmed Abdel, Farag Hamed Ibrahim, Reda Sameh M, Monem Ahmed Soltan, Ali Said Abdelfattah

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Department of Radiometry, National Institute of Standards, Giza, Egypt.

出版信息

J Med Phys. 2025 Jan-Mar;50(1):118-130. doi: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_167_24. Epub 2025 Feb 24.

DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_167_24
PMID:40256189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12005667/
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to optimize the quantitative aspects of (F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging by investigating the impact of various reconstruction parameters on the recovery coefficients (RCs) using the NEMA image quality phantom. Specifically, the study aims to assess how different matrix sizes, iterations, subsets, and Gaussian postfilters affect the accuracy of standardized uptake value (SUV) quantification in (F) FDG PET/CT imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study utilized the "Vue Point FX + Sharp IR" algorithm for PET image reconstruction, incorporating 3D-ordered subset expectation maximization (3D-OSEM), time-of-flight, and point spread function technologies. Various reconstruction parameters were explored, including two distinct matrix sizes, multiple iterations, subsets, and a wide range of Gaussian postfilters. The investigation focused on the impact of these parameters on RCs using the NEMA image quality phantom.

RESULTS

The results of the study indicated that for accurate SUV quantification in spheres ≥17 mm, the 256 × 256 matrix size and mean SUV should be employed. Conversely, for spheres ≤13 mm, maximum SUV was found to be more suitable. The choice of postfiltering value was shown to have a significant impact on SUV quantification accuracy, particularly for small-sized spheres. In addition, a larger matrix size was found to partially mitigate the effects of Gibbs artifact and slightly enhance SUV quantification for the spheres of various sizes.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the critical importance of optimizing PET reconstruction parameters in accordance with the guidelines set by European Association of Nuclear Medicine/EARL. By optimizing these parameters, the accuracy and reliability of SUV quantification in (F) FDG PET imaging can be significantly enhanced, especially for small-sized spheres. This underscores the necessity of carefully considering reconstruction parameters to ensure precise and reliable quantitative measurements in PET/CT imaging.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过使用NEMA图像质量体模研究各种重建参数对恢复系数(RC)的影响,以优化(F)氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)成像的定量方面。具体而言,该研究旨在评估不同的矩阵大小、迭代次数、子集数量和高斯后置滤波器如何影响(F)FDG PET/CT成像中标准化摄取值(SUV)定量的准确性。

材料与方法

本研究采用“Vue Point FX + Sharp IR”算法进行PET图像重建,该算法结合了三维有序子集期望最大化(3D-OSEM)、飞行时间和点扩散函数技术。探索了各种重建参数,包括两种不同的矩阵大小、多个迭代次数、子集数量以及广泛的高斯后置滤波器。该研究使用NEMA图像质量体模重点研究了这些参数对RC的影响。

结果

研究结果表明,对于直径≥17 mm的球体,要进行准确的SUV定量,应采用256×256的矩阵大小和平均SUV。相反,对于直径≤13 mm的球体,发现最大SUV更合适。结果显示,后置滤波值的选择对SUV定量准确性有显著影响,特别是对于小尺寸球体。此外,发现较大的矩阵大小可部分减轻吉布斯伪影的影响,并略微提高各种尺寸球体的SUV定量。

结论

本研究强调了根据欧洲核医学协会/EARL制定的指南优化PET重建参数的至关重要性。通过优化这些参数,(F)FDG PET成像中SUV定量的准确性和可靠性可显著提高,尤其是对于小尺寸球体。这突出了仔细考虑重建参数以确保PET/CT成像中精确可靠的定量测量的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/fca0352b2076/JMP-50-118-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/b347d10e90a2/JMP-50-118-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/7668560ad406/JMP-50-118-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/579d0bc3046e/JMP-50-118-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/428802b2f73f/JMP-50-118-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/d988b6d02c8b/JMP-50-118-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/66da21b2f096/JMP-50-118-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/b1b29c63c151/JMP-50-118-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/f09a6faa79ba/JMP-50-118-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/925308c0a679/JMP-50-118-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/bec421b1b84c/JMP-50-118-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/81591175574e/JMP-50-118-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/a8f61ae0ea6e/JMP-50-118-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/41a97b726582/JMP-50-118-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/035c3a25fd84/JMP-50-118-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/bfee0d67ef6a/JMP-50-118-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/f91f2ef89651/JMP-50-118-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/63beee1e0296/JMP-50-118-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/e2718afc7655/JMP-50-118-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/884b572e3f1b/JMP-50-118-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/1840110b752f/JMP-50-118-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/81119bb1721d/JMP-50-118-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/fca0352b2076/JMP-50-118-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/b347d10e90a2/JMP-50-118-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/7668560ad406/JMP-50-118-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/579d0bc3046e/JMP-50-118-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/428802b2f73f/JMP-50-118-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/d988b6d02c8b/JMP-50-118-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/66da21b2f096/JMP-50-118-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/b1b29c63c151/JMP-50-118-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/f09a6faa79ba/JMP-50-118-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/925308c0a679/JMP-50-118-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/bec421b1b84c/JMP-50-118-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/81591175574e/JMP-50-118-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/a8f61ae0ea6e/JMP-50-118-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/41a97b726582/JMP-50-118-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/035c3a25fd84/JMP-50-118-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/bfee0d67ef6a/JMP-50-118-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/f91f2ef89651/JMP-50-118-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/63beee1e0296/JMP-50-118-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/e2718afc7655/JMP-50-118-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/884b572e3f1b/JMP-50-118-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/1840110b752f/JMP-50-118-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/81119bb1721d/JMP-50-118-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d64/12005667/fca0352b2076/JMP-50-118-g023.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimization of Reconstruction Parameters for Discovery 710 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.Discovery 710正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描重建参数的优化
J Med Phys. 2025 Jan-Mar;50(1):118-130. doi: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_167_24. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
Investigating the Impact of Voxel Size and Postfiltering on Quantitative Analysis of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study.研究体素大小和后置滤波对正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描定量分析的影响:一项体模研究。
J Med Phys. 2024 Oct-Dec;49(4):597-607. doi: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_123_24. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
3
Impact of reconstruction algorithms at different sphere-to-background ratios on PET quantification: A phantom study.不同球体与背景比值下重建算法对PET定量分析的影响:一项模体研究。
Appl Radiat Isot. 2025 Jun;220:111761. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111761. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
4
The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.不同信背比对使用点扩散函数和飞行时间重建的空间分辨率及F18-FDG-PET定量分析的影响。
EJNMMI Phys. 2014 Dec;1(1):12. doi: 10.1186/2197-7364-1-12. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
5
Repeatability of F-FDG PET radiomic features: A phantom study to explore sensitivity to image reconstruction settings, noise, and delineation method.重复 F-FDG PET 放射组学特征:一项旨在探索对图像重建设置、噪声和勾画方法的敏感性的体模研究。
Med Phys. 2019 Feb;46(2):665-678. doi: 10.1002/mp.13322. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
6
Multicenter quantitative F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography performance harmonization: use of hottest voxels towards more robust quantification.多中心定量F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描性能协调:使用最热体素实现更稳健的定量分析。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Apr 1;13(4):2218-2233. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-443. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
7
Optimization of reconstruction in quantitative brain PET images: Benefits from PSF modeling and correction of edge artifacts.定量脑PET图像重建的优化:点扩散函数建模和边缘伪影校正的益处
Med Phys. 2024 Dec;51(12):9041-9056. doi: 10.1002/mp.17419. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
8
Using EQ·PET to reduce reconstruction-dependent variations in [F]FDG-PET brain imaging.采用 EQ·PET 减少 [F]FDG-PET 脑成像中的重建相关变异性。
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Aug 28;64(17):175002. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab35b4.
9
[Influence of Reconstruction FOV and Matrix Size on the Quantitative Accuracy of FDG-PET: Comparison between OSEM and Bayesian Penalized Likelihood].[重建视野和矩阵大小对FDG-PET定量准确性的影响:有序子集期望最大化算法与贝叶斯惩罚似然法的比较]
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2021;77(5):454-462. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2021_JSRT_77.5.454.
10
Impact of list-mode reconstruction and image-space point spread function correction on PET image contrast and quantitative value using SiPM-based PET/CT system.基于硅光电倍增管的 PET/CT 系统中,列表模式重建和图像空间点扩散函数校正对 PET 图像对比度和定量值的影响。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2023 Sep;16(3):384-396. doi: 10.1007/s12194-023-00729-y. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Harmonization based on quantitative analysis of standardized uptake value variations across PET/CT scanners: a multicenter phantom study.基于标准化摄取值变化的定量分析的 harmonization:多中心体模研究。
Nucl Med Commun. 2022 Sep 1;43(9):1004-1014. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001598. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Head-to-head comparison between digital and analog PET of human and phantom images when optimized for maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio from small lesions.在针对最大化小病灶的信噪比进行优化时,对人体和体模图像的数字PET与模拟PET进行直接比较。
EJNMMI Phys. 2020 Feb 21;7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40658-020-0281-8.
3
Feasibility of state of the art PET/CT systems performance harmonisation.
最先进的 PET/CT 系统性能协调的可行性。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Jul;45(8):1344-1361. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-3977-4. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
4
Characteristics of Smoothing Filters to Achieve the Guideline Recommended Positron Emission Tomography Image without Harmonization.在不进行归一化的情况下实现指南推荐的正电子发射断层扫描图像的平滑滤波器特性
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol. 2018 Winter;6(1):15-23. doi: 10.22038/aojnmb.2017.26684.1186.
5
EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems.EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT 认证 - 首批 200 个已认证成像系统的总结结果。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Mar;45(3):412-422. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3853-7. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
6
Edge Artifacts in Point Spread Function-based PET Reconstruction in Relation to Object Size and Reconstruction Parameters.基于点扩散函数的PET重建中与物体大小和重建参数相关的边缘伪影
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol. 2017 Spring;5(2):134-143. doi: 10.22038/aojnmb.2017.8802.
7
Optimal reconstruction matrix and PET image filtration for point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction - A phantom study.用于点扩散函数和飞行时间重建的最佳重建矩阵及PET图像滤波——体模研究
Phys Med. 2017 Jul;39:95-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
8
EORTC PET response criteria are more influenced by reconstruction inconsistencies than PERCIST but both benefit from the EARL harmonization program.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)反应标准比实体瘤疗效评价标准(PERCIST)更容易受到重建不一致性的影响,但两者都受益于欧洲放射学会低剂量协议(EARL)协调计划。
EJNMMI Phys. 2017 Dec;4(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40658-017-0185-4. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm.使用通用电气“锐利迭代重建(Sharp IR)”点扩散函数重建算法优化正电子发射断层显像/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)图像质量
Nucl Med Commun. 2017 Jun;38(6):471-479. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000669.
10
Generalized PSF modeling for optimized quantitation in PET imaging.用于PET成像中优化定量分析的广义点扩散函数建模
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jun 21;62(12):5149-5179. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6911. Epub 2017 Mar 24.