• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)和ENA-78检测在诊断羊膜腔内感染/炎症中的临床应用。

The clinic application of mNGS and ENA-78 assays to identify intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.

作者信息

Shen Di, Ju Hui, Wang Hongying, Wang Xietong, Li Guangzhen

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Regulation and Control Technology of National Health Commission of China, Shandong Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Jinan, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liao Cheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China.

出版信息

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Apr 4;15:1510671. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1510671. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1510671
PMID:40256453
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006116/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to explore whether metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and Epithelial Neutrophil Activating Peptide-78 (ENA-78) assays in the amniotic fluid (AF) of patients with preterm labor (PTL) could be employed for diagnosing intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (IAI/I) and predict the outcomes of emergency cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency(CI).

METHODS

AF samples from 40 patients were subjected to PTL were subjected to mNGS and microbial culture to diagnose intra-amniotic infection known as microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC); ELISA was used to analyze ENA-78 levels for prediction of intra-amniotic inflammation (IAI). Pregnancy outcomes were compared, the predictive performance of mNGS and ENA-78 were assessed to evaluate the efficacy of emergency cervical cerclage.

RESULTS

The diagnosis rate of MIAC was higher with mNGS (17.5%) compared to microbial culture (2.5%). AF ENA-78 levels were significantly higher in IAI patients than in non-IAI/I patients. ENA-78 demonstrated certain accuracy in identifying IAI, with sensitivity and specificity of 73.3% and 100%, respectively. Compared with non-IAI/I patients, patients with MIAC or IAI exhibited poor pregnancy outcomes after cervical cerclage.

CONCLUSIONS

mNGS and ENA-78 assays are valuable means for assessing the state of infection/inflammation in the amniotic cavity and predicting the outcomes of emergency cerclage.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨早产(PTL)患者羊水(AF)中的宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)和上皮中性粒细胞激活肽78(ENA-78)检测能否用于诊断羊膜腔内感染/炎症(IAI/I),并预测宫颈机能不全(CI)女性紧急宫颈环扎术的结局。

方法

对40例PTL患者的AF样本进行mNGS和微生物培养,以诊断羊膜腔内感染,即羊膜腔微生物入侵(MIAC);采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)分析ENA-78水平,以预测羊膜腔内炎症(IAI)。比较妊娠结局,评估mNGS和ENA-78的预测性能,以评价紧急宫颈环扎术的疗效。

结果

与微生物培养(2.5%)相比,mNGS诊断MIAC的阳性率更高(17.5%)。IAI患者的AF ENA-78水平显著高于非IAI/I患者。ENA-78在识别IAI方面具有一定的准确性,敏感性和特异性分别为73.3%和100%。与非IAI/I患者相比,MIAC或IAI患者宫颈环扎术后的妊娠结局较差。

结论

mNGS和ENA-78检测是评估羊膜腔感染/炎症状态及预测紧急宫颈环扎术结局的有价值方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d5/12006116/635e61277095/fcimb-15-1510671-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d5/12006116/c4771a3f8b24/fcimb-15-1510671-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d5/12006116/f843e10043c6/fcimb-15-1510671-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d5/12006116/635e61277095/fcimb-15-1510671-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d5/12006116/c4771a3f8b24/fcimb-15-1510671-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d5/12006116/f843e10043c6/fcimb-15-1510671-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1d5/12006116/635e61277095/fcimb-15-1510671-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The clinic application of mNGS and ENA-78 assays to identify intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)和ENA-78检测在诊断羊膜腔内感染/炎症中的临床应用。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Apr 4;15:1510671. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1510671. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictive potential of various plasma inflammation-, angiogenesis-, and extracellular matrix remodeling-associated mediators for intra-amniotic inflammation and/or microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in preterm labor.各种与血浆炎症、血管生成和细胞外基质重塑相关的介质对早产孕妇羊水中炎症和/或微生物入侵的预测潜能。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jul;310(1):413-426. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07378-5. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
Cervical fluid interleukin 6 and intra-amniotic complications of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.宫颈液白细胞介素6与胎膜早破早产的羊膜腔内并发症
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Apr;31(7):827-836. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1297792. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Maternal Plasma and Amniotic Fluid LBP, Pentraxin 3, Resistin, and IGFBP-3: Biomarkers of Microbial Invasion of Amniotic Cavity and/or Intra-amniotic Inflammation in Women with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes.母体血浆和羊水 LBP、Pentraxin 3、抵抗素和 IGFBP-3:胎膜早破孕妇羊膜腔和/或羊水中微生物入侵和/或炎症的生物标志物。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Nov 15;36(44):e279. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e279.
5
The diagnostic performance of the Mass Restricted (MR) score in the identification of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity or intra-amniotic inflammation is not superior to amniotic fluid interleukin-6.质量限制(MR)评分在识别羊膜腔微生物入侵或羊膜腔内炎症方面的诊断性能并不优于羊水白细胞介素-6。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 May;27(8):757-69. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.844123. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
6
Non-invasive prediction of intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation in patients with cervical insufficiency or an asymptomatic short cervix (≤15 mm).宫颈机能不全或无症状短宫颈(≤15毫米)患者羊膜腔内感染和/或炎症的无创预测
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Sep;292(3):579-87. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3684-3. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
7
Amniotic fluid CA-125 as a marker of intra-amniotic inflammation associated with preterm delivery: a preliminary single center study.羊水CA-125作为与早产相关的羊膜内炎症标志物:一项初步的单中心研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;293(1):55-59. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3775-1. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
8
Resistin in amniotic fluid and its association with intra-amniotic infection and inflammation.羊水抵抗素及其与羊膜腔内感染和炎症的关联。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Dec;21(12):902-16. doi: 10.1080/14767050802320357.
9
Patients with acute cervical insufficiency without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation treated with cerclage have a good prognosis.急性宫颈功能不全且无羊膜腔内感染/炎症的患者,经环扎术治疗后预后良好。
J Perinat Med. 2019 Jul 26;47(5):500-509. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0388.
10
Calprotectin levels in amniotic fluid in relation to intra-amniotic inflammation and infection in women with preterm labor with intact membranes: A retrospective cohort study.胎膜完整的早产女性羊水中钙卫蛋白水平与羊膜腔内炎症和感染的关系:一项回顾性队列研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 May;272:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical Cerclage: A Comprehensive Review of Major Guidelines.宫颈环扎术:主要指南的全面综述。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2023 Sep;78(9):544-553. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000001182.
2
Are bacteria, fungi, and archaea present in the midtrimester amniotic fluid?羊水中存在细菌、真菌和古菌吗?
J Perinat Med. 2023 May 17;51(7):886-890. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0604. Print 2023 Sep 26.
3
NETs promote ROS production to induce human amniotic epithelial cell apoptosis via ERK1/2 signaling in spontaneous preterm birth.NETs 通过 ERK1/2 信号通路促进 ROS 产生诱导人羊膜上皮细胞凋亡与自发性早产有关。
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2023 Mar;89(3):e13656. doi: 10.1111/aji.13656. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
The immunobiology of preterm labor and birth: intra-amniotic inflammation or breakdown of maternal-fetal homeostasis.早产和分娩的免疫生物学:羊膜内炎症还是母婴内稳态的破坏。
Reproduction. 2022 Jun 20;164(2):R11-R45. doi: 10.1530/REP-22-0046.
5
The Role of Innate Immune System in the Human Amniotic Membrane and Human Amniotic Fluid in Protection Against Intra-Amniotic Infections and Inflammation.先天免疫系统在人羊膜和人羊水抵抗羊膜内感染和炎症中的作用。
Front Immunol. 2021 Oct 21;12:735324. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.735324. eCollection 2021.
6
Interleukin-6 in Amniotic Fluid: A Reliable Marker for Adverse Outcomes in Women in Preterm Labor and Intact Membranes.羊水中白细胞介素-6:未足月胎膜早破孕妇不良结局的可靠标志物
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2021;48(4):313-320. doi: 10.1159/000514898. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
7
Preterm birth prevention.早产的预防。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Nov;69:40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
The Red Blood Cell-Inflammation Vicious Circle in Sickle Cell Disease.镰状细胞病中的红细胞-炎症恶性循环。
Front Immunol. 2020 Mar 13;11:454. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00454. eCollection 2020.
9
Root extracellular traps versus neutrophil extracellular traps in host defence, a case of functional convergence?宿主防御中的根细胞外陷阱与中性粒细胞细胞外陷阱:功能趋同的案例?
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Oct;94(5):1685-1700. doi: 10.1111/brv.12522. Epub 2019 May 27.
10
Microbiological Diagnostic Performance of Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing When Applied to Clinical Practice.宏基因组下一代测序在临床应用中的微生物诊断性能。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 13;67(suppl_2):S231-S240. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy693.