• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本体感觉之谜:一项观察性研究,探究颈椎本体感觉误差对年轻人定量感觉测试和身体意识的影响。

The proprioceptive puzzle: An observational study investigating the effects of cervical proprioceptive errors on quantitative sensory testing and body awareness in young individuals.

作者信息

Acet Nagihan, Begen Sena

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Atılım University, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 21;20(4):e0321645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321645. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0321645
PMID:40257972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12011245/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigates the effects of cervical proprioceptive errors (CPE) on body awareness and quantitative sensory testing (QST), including the pressure pain threshold, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation in young individuals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Included in this prospective cross-sectional study were 78 participants who were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of CPE. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the clinical trial number [NCT06559397]. Cervical proprioception was measured using the "head position error test", body awareness was assessed using the "Body Awareness Questionnaire", QST was assessed using a mechanical pressure algometer, and conditioned pain modulation was evaluated using cold stimulus.

RESULTS

The study revealed a significant reduction in body awareness among those with CPE (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of QST, including the pressure pain threshold, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CPE can have a significant impact on body awareness, leading to a decrease in the ability to perceive one's own body. While the present study offers no significant findings related to QST, it provides new insights into the relationship between proprioception, body awareness, and pain processing mechanisms. Clinically, the results suggest the importance of integrating interventions aimed at enhancing body awareness into the treatment protocols of patients with CPE.

摘要

目的

本研究调查颈椎本体感觉误差(CPE)对年轻人身体意识和定量感觉测试(QST)的影响,包括压力痛阈、时间总和和条件性疼痛调制。

材料与方法

本前瞻性横断面研究纳入78名参与者,根据是否存在CPE将其分为两组。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,临床试验编号为[NCT06559397]。使用“头部位置误差测试”测量颈椎本体感觉,使用“身体意识问卷”评估身体意识,使用机械压力痛觉计评估QST,并使用冷刺激评估条件性疼痛调制。

结果

研究显示,存在CPE者的身体意识显著降低(p < 0.001),而在QST方面,包括压力痛阈、时间总和和条件性疼痛调制,两组之间未发现显著差异(p > 0.05)。

结论

CPE可对身体意识产生显著影响,导致个体感知自身身体的能力下降。虽然本研究在QST方面未得出显著结果,但它为本体感觉、身体意识和疼痛处理机制之间的关系提供了新的见解。临床上,结果表明将旨在增强身体意识的干预措施纳入CPE患者的治疗方案具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a77b/12011245/fd4dd4a1bddd/pone.0321645.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a77b/12011245/fd4dd4a1bddd/pone.0321645.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a77b/12011245/fd4dd4a1bddd/pone.0321645.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The proprioceptive puzzle: An observational study investigating the effects of cervical proprioceptive errors on quantitative sensory testing and body awareness in young individuals.本体感觉之谜:一项观察性研究,探究颈椎本体感觉误差对年轻人定量感觉测试和身体意识的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 21;20(4):e0321645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321645. eCollection 2025.
2
Multifactorial assessment of measurement errors affecting intraoral quantitative sensory testing reliability.影响口腔内定量感觉测试可靠性的测量误差的多因素评估。
Scand J Pain. 2017 Jul;16:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 May 1.
3
Efficacy of a proprioceptive exercise program in patients with nonspecific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.本体感觉运动方案治疗非特异性颈痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Jun;57(3):397-405. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06302-9. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
Reliability and minimal detectable change of dynamic temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation using a single experimental paradigm.采用单一实验范式评估动态时间总和和条件性疼痛调制的可靠性和最小可检测变化。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 25;19(7):e0307556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307556. eCollection 2024.
5
Spinal manipulation and modulation of pain sensitivity in persistent low back pain: a secondary cluster analysis of a randomized trial.脊柱推拿与慢性腰痛疼痛敏感性调制:一项随机试验的二次聚类分析。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2021 Feb 24;29(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12998-021-00367-4.
6
The long-term reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in healthy individuals.健康人群静态和动态定量感觉测试的长期可靠性。
Pain. 2017 Jul;158(7):1217-1223. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000901.
7
Quantitative sensory testing and exercise-induced hypoalgesia protocols in low back pain: A scoping review.下腰痛的定量感觉测试和运动诱发性痛觉减退方案:一项范围综述
J Pain. 2025 Mar;28:104725. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104725. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
8
Do chronic low back pain subgroups derived from dynamic quantitative sensory testing exhibit differing multidimensional profiles?从动态定量感觉测试得出的慢性下腰痛亚组是否表现出不同的多维特征?
Scand J Pain. 2021 Feb 25;21(3):474-484. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0126. Print 2021 Jul 27.
9
Effect of conditioned pain modulation on trigeminal somatosensory function evaluated by quantitative sensory testing.条件性疼痛调制对定量感觉测试评估的三叉神经躯体感觉功能的影响。
Pain. 2013 Dec;154(12):2684-2690. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.049. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
10
Comparison of head posture and neck proprioceptive sense of individuals with chronic neck pain and healthy controls: A cross-sectional study.慢性颈痛患者与健康对照组头部姿势和颈部本体感觉的比较:一项横断面研究。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024;37(6):1705-1713. doi: 10.3233/BMR-240155.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Proprioception in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain.颈椎松动术对非特异性颈部疼痛患者平衡及本体感觉的影响
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2024 Jul-Dec;47(5-9):175-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.011. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
A Cross-Sectional Study on Mediating Effect of Chronic Pain on the Relationship between Cervical Proprioception and Functional Balance in Elderly Individuals with Chronic Neck Pain: Mediation Analysis Study.慢性疼痛对慢性颈痛老年患者颈部本体感觉与功能平衡关系的中介作用横断面研究:中介分析研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 26;12(9):3140. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093140.
3
The effect of body awareness on trunk control, affected upper extremity function, balance, fear of falling, functional level, and level of independence in patients with stroke.
身体意识对躯干控制、患侧上肢功能、平衡、跌倒恐惧、功能水平和独立性水平的影响。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023 Oct;30(7):681-690. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2185995. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
4
Investigation of Joint Position Sense and Balance in Individuals With Chronic Idiopathic Neck Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.慢性特发性颈部疼痛患者的关节位置觉和平衡能力调查:一项横断面研究。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2022 Mar-Apr;45(3):188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
5
Temporal Summation in Fibromyalgia Patients: Comparing Phasic and Tonic Paradigms.纤维肌痛患者的时间总和:比较相位和紧张性范式。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 22;3:881543. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.881543. eCollection 2022.
6
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of SF-12 Health Survey.SF-12 健康调查土耳其语版的信度和效度。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2022 Summer;33(2):108-117. doi: 10.5080/u25700.
7
Effects of proprioceptive training for people with stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.本体感训练对脑卒中患者的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Rehabil. 2022 Apr;36(4):431-448. doi: 10.1177/02692155211057656. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
8
Factors affecting body awareness in older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain.影响患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的老年人身体意识的因素。
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Jul 17;17(4):934-939. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.86614. eCollection 2021.
9
Temporal summation of mechanical pain prospectively predicts movement-evoked pain severity in adults with chronic low back pain.机械性疼痛的时间总和可预测慢性下腰痛成人运动诱发疼痛的严重程度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 May 10;22(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04306-5.
10
Cervical Proprioception Impairment in Neck Pain-Pathophysiology, Clinical Evaluation, and Management: A Narrative Review.颈部疼痛中颈椎本体感觉障碍——病理生理学、临床评估与管理:一篇叙述性综述
Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):143-164. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00230-z. Epub 2021 Jan 12.