文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Patient information needs for transparent and trustworthy cardiovascular artificial intelligence: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Stroud Austin M, Minteer Sarah A, Zhu Xuan, Ridgeway Jennifer L, Miller Jennifer E, Barry Barbara A

机构信息

Biomedical Ethics Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.

出版信息

PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Apr 21;4(4):e0000826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000826. eCollection 2025 Apr.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000826
PMID:40258073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12011294/
Abstract

As health systems incorporate artificial intelligence (AI) into various aspects of patient care, there is growing interest in understanding how to ensure transparent and trustworthy implementation. However, little attention has been given to what information patients need about these technologies to promote transparency of their use. We conducted three asynchronous online focus groups with 42 patients across the United States discussing perspectives on their information needs for trust and uptake of AI, focusing on its use in cardiovascular care. Data were analyzed using a rapid content analysis approach. Our results suggest that patients have a set of core information needs, including specific information factors pertaining to the AI tool, oversight, and healthcare experience, that are relevant to calibrating trust as well as perspectives concerning information delivery, disclosure, consent, and physician AI use. Identifying patient information needs is a critical starting point for calibrating trust in healthcare AI systems and designing strategies for information delivery. These findings highlight the importance of patient-centered engagement when developing AI model documentation and communicating and provisioning information about these technologies in clinical encounters.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b523/12011294/0467a193df35/pdig.0000826.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b523/12011294/0467a193df35/pdig.0000826.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b523/12011294/0467a193df35/pdig.0000826.g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Patient information needs for transparent and trustworthy cardiovascular artificial intelligence: A qualitative study.

PLOS Digit Health. 2025-4-21

[2]
Trustworthy and ethical AI-enabled cardiovascular care: a rapid review.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024-9-4

[3]
Artificial Intelligence in Health Care-Understanding Patient Information Needs and Designing Comprehensible Transparency: Qualitative Study.

JMIR AI. 2023

[4]
Trustworthy artificial intelligence and ethical design: public perceptions of trustworthiness of an AI-based decision-support tool in the context of intrapartum care.

BMC Med Ethics. 2023-6-20

[5]
Exploring Physician Perspectives on Using Real-world Care Data for the Development of Artificial Intelligence-Based Technologies in Health Care: Qualitative Study.

JMIR Form Res. 2022-5-18

[6]
Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Ethical Clinical Challenges and Pathways to Trustworthy AI.

J Clin Med. 2025-2-27

[7]
Understanding the integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare organisations and systems through the NASSS framework: a qualitative study in a leading Canadian academic centre.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-6-3

[8]
Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives on the Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Digital Technologies for Heart Disease Diagnosis: Qualitative Study.

JMIR Cardio. 2025-3-5

[9]
Towards secure and trusted AI in healthcare: A systematic review of emerging innovations and ethical challenges.

Int J Med Inform. 2025-3

[10]
Entrustment and EPAs for Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Framework to Safeguard the Use of AI in Health Professions Education.

Acad Med. 2025-3-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
AI in Qualitative Health Research Appraisal: Comparative Study.

JMIR Form Res. 2025-7-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
Patient Consent and The Right to Notice and Explanation of AI Systems Used in Health Care.

Am J Bioeth. 2025-3

[2]
Interpretation of Artificial Intelligence Models in Healthcare: A Pictorial Guide for Clinicians.

J Ultrasound Med. 2024-10

[3]
An Ethically Supported Framework for Determining Patient Notification and Informed Consent Practices When Using Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.

Chest. 2024-9

[4]
Patient perspectives on informed consent for medical AI: A web-based experiment.

Digit Health. 2024-4-30

[5]
Artificial Intelligence in Health Care-Understanding Patient Information Needs and Designing Comprehensible Transparency: Qualitative Study.

JMIR AI. 2023

[6]
Transparency of artificial intelligence/machine learning-enabled medical devices.

NPJ Digit Med. 2024-1-26

[7]
Trust criteria for artificial intelligence in health: normative and epistemic considerations.

J Med Ethics. 2024-7-23

[8]
Exploring patient perspectives on how they can and should be engaged in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in health care.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023-10-26

[9]
The Role of Artificial Intelligence Model Documentation in Translational Science: Scoping Review.

Interact J Med Res. 2023-7-14

[10]
Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities-A global review.

PLOS Digit Health. 2022-3-31

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索