Suppr超能文献

在医疗保健中使用人工智能时确定患者通知和知情同意实践的伦理支持框架。

An Ethically Supported Framework for Determining Patient Notification and Informed Consent Practices When Using Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.

机构信息

Center for Bioethics and Society, Department of Bioinformatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Department of Social Medicine, Ohio University-Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH.

出版信息

Chest. 2024 Sep;166(3):572-578. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.04.014. Epub 2024 May 22.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in health care. Without an ethically supportable, standard approach to knowing when patients should be informed about AI, hospital systems and clinicians run the risk of fostering mistrust among their patients and the public. Therefore, hospital leaders need guidance on when to tell patients about the use of AI in their care. In this article, we provide such guidance. To determine which AI technologies fall into each of the identified categories (no notification or no informed consent [IC], notification only, and formal IC), we propose that AI use-cases should be evaluated using the following criteria: (1) AI model autonomy, (2) departure from standards of practice, (3) whether the AI model is patient facing, (4) clinical risk introduced by the model, and (5) administrative burdens. We take each of these in turn, using a case example of AI in health care to illustrate our proposed framework. As AI becomes more commonplace in health care, our proposal may serve as a starting point for creating consensus on standards for notification and IC for the use of AI in patient care.

摘要

人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域的应用日益广泛。如果没有一种在道德上可以支持的、告知患者何时应了解 AI 的标准方法,医院系统和临床医生可能会在患者和公众中培养不信任感。因此,医院领导者需要指导何时告知患者 AI 在其护理中的使用情况。在本文中,我们提供了这样的指导。为了确定哪些 AI 技术属于已确定的类别(无需通知或无需获得知情同意[IC]、仅通知和正式 IC),我们建议使用以下标准评估 AI 用例:(1)AI 模型自主性,(2)偏离实践标准,(3)AI 模型是否面向患者,(4)模型带来的临床风险,以及(5)行政负担。我们依次讨论了这些标准,并用医疗保健中 AI 的案例来说明我们提出的框架。随着 AI 在医疗保健中的应用越来越普遍,我们的建议可能成为在 AI 用于患者护理的通知和知情同意标准方面达成共识的起点。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
Perspectives of Patients About Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.患者对医疗保健中人工智能的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2210309. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10309.
10
Approaching autonomy in medical artificial intelligence.迈向医学人工智能的自主性
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Sep;2(9):e447-e449. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30187-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验