McClean Melissa, Akter Nahida, Kowalchik Kaléi H, Mogle Jacqueline, Kitt-Lewis Erin Ann, Paudel Anju, Jones Joanne Roman, Carpenter Joan G, Behrens Liza L
Organizational Systems and Adult Health Department, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Gerontologist. 2025 May 10;65(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf134.
Social activities are recognized as vital for older adults' quality of life. The COVID-19 pandemic presented challenges for nursing home (NH) staff as they attempted to balance infection risks with residents' preferences for social activities. The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of NH staff's experiences and actions accommodating resident preferences for social activities during pandemic restrictions.
This study used a convergent mixed methods approach to provide an in-depth description of NH staff's (N = 24) risk propensity and decision-making. Quantitative data included self-reported demographics and risk perceptions using the Risk Propensity Scale. Qualitative data included semistructured individual interviews. Data were integrated to explain the link between individual risk perceptions and infection control practices related to social activities.
Participants were purposively sampled to reflect a range of direct care NH staff roles including certified nursing assistants (29%), activities staff (25%), social workers (25%), and licensed nurses (21%). Participants were on average 39 years of age, mostly White (79%), and female (88%). Most identified as risk-avoiders (58%). Guided content analysis of interviews revealed two main themes that describe staff's behaviors while balancing infection control and residents' social activity preferences: factors of decision-making (family influence, organizational, staff and resident characteristics) and staff influencing preference-based care (cognitive skills and technical skills).
Risk perceptions and resultant decision-making vary among direct care NH staff. Mixed interpretation offers insight on staff's attempt to balance infection risks with residents' preferences to engage in social activities.
社交活动被认为对老年人的生活质量至关重要。新冠疫情给养老院工作人员带来了挑战,因为他们试图在感染风险与居民对社交活动的偏好之间取得平衡。本研究的目的是了解养老院工作人员在疫情限制期间满足居民社交活动偏好的经历和行动。
本研究采用了收敛性混合方法,以深入描述养老院工作人员(N = 24)的风险倾向和决策过程。定量数据包括使用风险倾向量表自我报告的人口统计学和风险认知。定性数据包括半结构化的个人访谈。对数据进行整合,以解释个人风险认知与社交活动感染控制实践之间的联系。
采用目的抽样法选取参与者,以反映一系列直接护理养老院工作人员的角色,包括认证护理助理(29%)、活动工作人员(25%)、社会工作者(25%)和执业护士(21%)。参与者的平均年龄为39岁,大多为白人(79%),女性(88%)。大多数人认为自己是风险规避者(58%)。对访谈进行的引导式内容分析揭示了两个主要主题,描述了工作人员在平衡感染控制和居民社交活动偏好时的行为:决策因素(家庭影响、组织、工作人员和居民特征)以及工作人员对基于偏好的护理的影响(认知技能和技术技能)。
直接护理养老院工作人员的风险认知和由此产生的决策各不相同。混合解读为工作人员在平衡感染风险与居民参与社交活动的偏好方面的尝试提供了见解。