Suppr超能文献

关节内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)与皮质类固醇治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:随机临床试验的系统评价

Efficacy and Safety of Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Versus Corticosteroid Injections in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Diaz Haaz Diego Ivan, Rizo Castro Oswaldo

机构信息

Faculty of Human Medicine "Dr. Manuel Velasco Suárez" Campus II, Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, Chiapas, MEX.

Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Antiguo Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde", Guadalajara, MEX.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Mar 21;17(3):e80948. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80948. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent condition that significantly impacts the quality of life due to pain and associated disability. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have emerged as a promising alternative treatment, though their efficacy and safety remain debatable. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP injections in patients with knee OA by analyzing randomized clinical trials (RCTs). A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Virtual Health Library (VHL) for studies published from 2019 to 2024, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data extraction and methodological quality assessment were performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2). Of the 129 studies identified, six met the inclusion criteria. The studies varied in sample size (36-80 patients) and PRP preparation methods. The results suggest that intra-articular (IA) PRP and corticosteroid (CS) injections are safe and effective for treating knee OA, reducing pain and improving symptoms. Some studies indicate that PRP injections may offer prolonged benefits, although there is no consensus on whether one treatment is superior. No serious adverse effects were reported, and the side effects observed were mild, suggesting a favorable safety profile. In conclusion, PRP is a viable therapeutic alternative for managing knee OA, with sustained benefits compared to CS. However, further research is needed to standardize protocols and assess long-term effects.

摘要

骨关节炎(OA)是一种常见病症,因其疼痛和相关残疾严重影响生活质量。富血小板血浆(PRP)注射已成为一种有前景的替代治疗方法,但其疗效和安全性仍存在争议。本系统评价旨在通过分析随机临床试验(RCT)评估PRP注射对膝骨关节炎患者的疗效和安全性。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,在PubMed、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)和虚拟健康图书馆(VHL)中全面检索了2019年至2024年发表的研究。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)进行数据提取和方法学质量评估。在识别出的129项研究中,有6项符合纳入标准。这些研究的样本量(36 - 80名患者)和PRP制备方法各不相同。结果表明,关节内(IA)注射PRP和皮质类固醇(CS)对治疗膝骨关节炎是安全有效的,可减轻疼痛并改善症状。一些研究表明,PRP注射可能带来长期益处,尽管对于哪种治疗更优尚无共识。未报告严重不良反应,观察到的副作用较轻,表明安全性良好。总之,PRP是治疗膝骨关节炎的一种可行的治疗选择,与CS相比具有持续的益处。然而,需要进一步研究来规范方案并评估长期效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62bb/12010028/16c92c875fe0/cureus-0017-00000080948-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验