Clifford James S, Williams Ronaldo T, Hall Caitlyn, Moya Quezada Fernanda, Blondino Courtney T
Department of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Health Studies, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2025;60(8):1173-1180. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2025.2491769. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
Tobacco product usage patterns vary significantly across different segments of the population. Combustible tobacco product usage decreased from 19.3% to 12.5%, while electronic cigarette (ECIG) use rose from 1.8% to 3.7% for the US population from 2010 to 2020. However, age-specific estimates differ between younger and older adults. It is possible there are latent subpopulations within American adults.
Data from Wave 6 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health survey (PATH, = 30,516) were analyzed. Participants were classified as a member of Generation Z ( = 10,920), Millennials ( = 10,450), Generation X ( = 6122), or Baby Boomers ( = 3024) a 6-level ordinal variable collected by PATH. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified distinct groups based on 8 tobacco use variables.
Analysis suggests that a 4-class solution provides the optimal solution for the entire sample. These classes comprised of a low-use class, a high-use class, ECIG Plus (defined as ECIG use with less probability of other tobacco product use), and a conventional user class, defined as high probability on conventional tobacco products. A 4-class solution also provided optimal fit for each generation, though the classes were defined differently.
Understanding tobacco use patterns across different classes is crucial for public health interventions. The discovery of a possible class of social users among Generation Z and Millennials suggests that targeted interventions tailored to the social contexts and behaviors of younger generations may be effective while pharmacological treatments may be more efficacious for Baby Boomers.
烟草产品的使用模式在不同人群中差异显著。2010年至2020年期间,美国人群中可燃烟草产品的使用率从19.3%降至12.5%,而电子烟(ECIG)的使用率从1.8%升至3.7%。然而,年轻人和老年人的年龄特异性估计有所不同。美国成年人中可能存在潜在的亚群体。
分析了烟草与健康人口评估调查(PATH,n = 30516)第6波的数据。参与者被分类为Z世代(n = 10920)、千禧一代(n = 10450)、X世代(n = 6122)或婴儿潮一代(n = 3024)——这是一个由PATH收集的6级有序变量。潜在类别分析(LCA)根据8个烟草使用变量确定了不同的群体。
分析表明,4类解决方案为整个样本提供了最佳解决方案。这些类别包括低使用类、高使用类、电子烟增强类(定义为使用电子烟且使用其他烟草产品的可能性较小)和传统用户类,定义为使用传统烟草产品的可能性较高。4类解决方案也为每一代提供了最佳拟合,尽管类别定义不同。
了解不同类别的烟草使用模式对于公共卫生干预至关重要。在Z世代和千禧一代中发现可能存在的社交用户类别表明,针对年轻一代的社会背景和行为量身定制的有针对性干预措施可能有效,而药物治疗对婴儿潮一代可能更有效。