Zrnić Novaković Irina, Ajduković Dean, Ajduković Marina, Kenntemich Laura, Lotzin Annett, Schäfer Ingo, Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous Xenia, Evgeniou Eleftheria, Borges Camila, Figueiredo-Braga Margarida, Russo Moritz, Lueger-Schuster Brigitte
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Vienna Doctoral School in Cognition, Behaviour and Neuroscience, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2488700. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2488700. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is well documented. However, only a few studies investigated mental health in later phases of the pandemic and after its official end. Moreover, little is known about people's psychological burden related to the pandemic and other global crises post-pandemic. Study's first objective was to compare mental health outcomes in the general population over the course of the pandemic and ten months post-pandemic. The second objective was to explore people's psychological burden regarding the pandemic, in comparison to current wars, climate crises, inflation, and poor government management and/or corruption in the post-pandemic era. Participants from the general population of Austria, Croatia, Germany, Greece, and Portugal (68.8% female, = 41.55) were assessed online up to four times between June 2020 and March 2024 (baseline sample: = 7913). (ADNM-8), (PHQ-2), and (WHO-5) were used to measure adjustment disorder, depression, and well-being. Prevalence rates were calculated and repeated measures ANOVAs applied to assess mental health at four time points. One-way repeated measures ANOVA was run to explore how the different global crises were related to participants' burden. Temporal variations in mental health were evident across four assessment waves, with highest levels of probable adjustment disorder and depression in winter 2020/2021 (T2). A slight improvement of mental health was found at later time points. Current wars and inflation were the greatest sources of psychological burden at the post-pandemic assessment, revealing some cross-country differences. Although mental health differences in the general population were not as pronounced as in the acute phase of the pandemic, psychosocial support is still needed post-pandemic. This is likely to be due to other global crises that take a toll on people's mental health.
新冠疫情对心理健康的影响已有充分记录。然而,只有少数研究调查了疫情后期及官方结束后的心理健康状况。此外,对于疫情后人们与疫情及其他全球危机相关的心理负担知之甚少。该研究的首要目标是比较疫情期间及疫情结束后十个月内普通人群的心理健康状况。第二个目标是探讨与当前战争、气候危机、通货膨胀以及疫情后时代政府管理不善和/或腐败相比,人们对疫情的心理负担。对来自奥地利、克罗地亚、德国、希腊和葡萄牙普通人群的参与者(68.8%为女性,平均年龄 = 41.55岁)在2020年6月至2024年3月期间进行了多达四次的在线评估(基线样本:平均年龄 = 7913岁)。使用(ADNM - 8)、(PHQ - 2)和(WHO - 5)来测量适应障碍、抑郁和幸福感。计算患病率并应用重复测量方差分析来评估四个时间点的心理健康状况。进行单因素重复测量方差分析以探讨不同的全球危机与参与者负担之间的关系。在四个评估阶段中,心理健康的时间变化明显,2020/2021年冬季(T2)可能的适应障碍和抑郁水平最高。在后期时间点发现心理健康状况略有改善。在疫情后评估中,当前战争和通货膨胀是心理负担的最大来源,存在一些国家间差异。尽管普通人群的心理健康差异不如疫情急性期那么明显,但疫情后仍需要心理社会支持。这可能是由于其他全球危机对人们的心理健康造成了影响。