Werner Paul, Winter Martin, Coti Iuliana, Kahrovic Amila, Andreas Martin, Haberl Thomas, Zimpfer Daniel, Ehrlich Marek
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Innovations (Phila). 2025 Mar-Apr;20(2):148-157. doi: 10.1177/15569845251333344. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
The choice of cannulation technique for cardiopulmonary bypass remains a critical decision in cardiac surgery with direct consequences for intraoperative management and patient outcomes. Central and femoral cannulation represent the 2 dominant approaches, each associated with unique anatomical considerations, hemodynamic implications, and perioperative risks. The correct selection of a cannulation strategy should limit the risk of embolic events and associated complications such as vascular injury and stroke. The purpose of this review is to provide a detailed comparison of central and femoral cannulation techniques, with an emphasis on clinical scenarios and outcomes, recent innovations, and state-of-the-art technology. By critically analyzing current evidence, we aim to offer insights into the optimal cannulation strategy tailored to specific patients.
在心脏手术中,体外循环插管技术的选择仍然是一个关键决策,对术中管理和患者预后有着直接影响。中心插管和股动脉插管是两种主要方法,每种方法都有独特的解剖学考量、血流动力学影响和围手术期风险。正确选择插管策略应能降低栓塞事件及血管损伤和中风等相关并发症的风险。本综述的目的是详细比较中心插管和股动脉插管技术,重点关注临床情况和预后、近期创新以及最新技术。通过严格分析现有证据,我们旨在深入了解针对特定患者的最佳插管策略。