• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

核心1级:核心分级方法概述。

Core GRADE 1: overview of the Core GRADE approach.

作者信息

Guyatt Gordon, Agoritsas Thomas, Brignardello-Petersen Romina, Mustafa Reem A, Rylance Jamie, Foroutan Farid, Prasad Manya, Agarwal Arnav, De Beer Hans, Murad M Hassan, Schandelmaier Stefan, Iorio Alfonso, Yao Liang, Jaeschke Roman, Vandvik Per Olav, Zeng Linan, Parpia Sameer, D'Souza Rohan, Rind David, Chu Derek K, Eachempati Prashanti, Prasad Kameshwar, Hultcrantz Monica, Montori Victor M

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ. 2025 Apr 22;389:e081903. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081903.

DOI:10.1136/bmj-2024-081903
PMID:40262844
Abstract

This first article in a seven part series presents an overview of the essential elements of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach that has proved extremely useful in systematic reviews, health technology assessment reports, and clinical practice guidelines. GRADE guidance has appeared in many articles dealing with both core issues and more specialised and complex guidance, and it has evolved over time. This series of articles presents GRADE essentials, Core GRADE, focusing on the core judgments necessary to summarise the comparative evidence about alternative care options and to make recommendations that apply to the care of individual patients. This article presents detailed guidance on formulating questions using the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) structure, and refining the question considering possible differences in relative and absolute effects across patient groups. The article then provides an overview of the remainder of the Core GRADE approach, including decisions about the certainty of the evidence and considerations in moving from evidence to guidance and recommendations.

摘要

本系列共七篇文章中的第一篇,概述了GRADE(推荐分级评估、制定与评价)方法的基本要素,该方法在系统评价、卫生技术评估报告及临床实践指南中已证明极为有用。GRADE指南已出现在许多涉及核心问题以及更专业复杂指南的文章中,且随着时间不断演变。本系列文章介绍GRADE要点,即核心GRADE,重点关注总结替代护理方案比较证据及提出适用于个体患者护理建议所需的核心判断。本文提供了关于使用PICO(人群、干预措施、对照、结局)结构提出问题,并考虑不同患者群体相对和绝对效应可能存在的差异来完善问题的详细指南。然后,本文概述了核心GRADE方法的其余部分,包括关于证据确定性的决策以及从证据到指南和建议过程中的考量。

相似文献

1
Core GRADE 1: overview of the Core GRADE approach.核心1级:核心分级方法概述。
BMJ. 2025 Apr 22;389:e081903. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081903.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy.GRADE 指南:21 部分 1. 研究设计、偏倚风险和间接性,用于对一组证据进行测试准确性的确定性评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:129-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.020. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
5
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.GRADE 指南:1. 简介-GRADE 证据概况和发现摘要表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
6
GRADE guidance 35: update on rating imprecision for assessing contextualized certainty of evidence and making decisions.GRADE指南35:评估证据情境化确定性和做出决策时对不精确性评级的更新
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:225-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.015. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
7
[GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables].[GRADE指南:1. 引言 - GRADE证据概要及结果总结表]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(5):357-68. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
8
Core GRADE 3: rating certainty of evidence-assessing inconsistency.核心3级:评估证据的确定性——评估不一致性。
BMJ. 2025 May 6;389:e081905. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081905.
9
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments.改进GRADE证据表第3部分:解释性脚注的详细指南有助于在证据判断中创建和理解GRADE确定性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
10
Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update为医疗保健研究与质量局的有效医疗保健计划评估医疗保健干预措施时证据体强度的分级:最新进展

引用本文的文献

1
Raising our game: the bare minimum every systematic review publication must meet.提升我们的水平:每篇系统评价出版物必须达到的最低要求。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Sep 2;9(1):e003717. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003717.
2
Association between e-cigarette use, physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: protocol for a systematic review.电子烟使用、身体活动与心肺适能之间的关联:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 28;15(7):e101489. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101489.
3
Using updated clinical recommendations to support contraceptive decision-making: U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2024.
利用最新临床建议支持避孕决策:2024年美国避孕使用医学资格标准
Contraception. 2025 Jul 14:111015. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111015.
4
What is the probability that higher versus lower quality of evidence represents true effects estimates?较高质量与较低质量的证据代表真实效应估计值的概率是多少?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e14160. doi: 10.1111/jep.14160. Epub 2024 Oct 7.