• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在常规临床护理中评估前列腺癌患者的电子患者报告结局监测系统:一项前瞻性观察性研究。

Evaluating an electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring system in patients with prostate cancer in routine clinical care: a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Vorbach Samuel M, Sparano Francesco, Kreissl Stefanie, Riedl David, Sarcletti Manuel P, Ginestet Angela, Holzner Bernhard, Ganswindt Ute, Lehmann Jens

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, AT-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Haematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03977-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-025-03977-0
PMID:40263189
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical utility of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system for patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted at the Medical University of Innsbruck among patients receiving RT for primary or recurrent prostate cancer. The ePRO system was designed to capture patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life throughout treatment and follow-up, aiming to standardize symptom monitoring and improve continuity of care. Patients completed questionnaires at baseline, during treatment, and in follow-up with feasibility defined as ≥ 75% of patients completing at least 75% of scheduled assessments. Patients' acceptability was evaluated at baseline and at treatment end using self-developed questionnaires. Healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perception of clinical utility of the system was measured with a self-developed questionnaire.

RESULTS

Forty patients participated in the study with a median age of 71 years. The ePRO system was feasible, with an average completion rate of 87%, exceeding the feasibility threshold. Patient acceptability was high, with 98% (39/40) expressing willingness to use it regularly. HCPs' feedback was also positive, with all HCPs (100%, 8/8) reporting usefulness of the system in clinical care and 83% reporting that the system helped them in the clinical assessment of their patients.

CONCLUSION

The ePRO monitoring system was feasible and well-accepted among both patients and HCPs, demonstrating potential for continued use in routine clinical care. Further efforts are needed to optimize clinical integration and address barriers to ensure equitable access.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了在常规临床实践中,电子患者报告结局(ePRO)系统用于接受前列腺癌放射治疗(RT)患者的可行性、可接受性及临床实用性。

方法

在因斯布鲁克医科大学对接受原发性或复发性前列腺癌放射治疗的患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。ePRO系统旨在在整个治疗和随访过程中收集患者报告的症状及与健康相关的生活质量,旨在规范症状监测并改善护理的连续性。患者在基线、治疗期间及随访时完成问卷,可行性定义为≥75%的患者完成至少75%的预定评估。使用自行编制的问卷在基线和治疗结束时评估患者的可接受性。通过自行编制的问卷测量医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对该系统临床实用性的看法。

结果

40名患者参与了研究,中位年龄为71岁。ePRO系统是可行的,平均完成率为87%,超过了可行性阈值。患者的可接受性较高,98%(39/40)表示愿意经常使用。HCPs的反馈也很积极,所有HCPs(100%,8/8)报告该系统在临床护理中有用,83%报告该系统在对患者的临床评估中对他们有帮助。

结论

ePRO监测系统在患者和HCPs中都是可行的且被广泛接受,显示出在常规临床护理中持续使用的潜力。需要进一步努力优化临床整合并消除障碍,以确保公平使用。

相似文献

1
Evaluating an electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring system in patients with prostate cancer in routine clinical care: a prospective observational study.在常规临床护理中评估前列腺癌患者的电子患者报告结局监测系统:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03977-0.
2
Feasibility of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System in People Living With HIV: Retrospective Analysis of a Mobile App-Based Pilot Study.电子患者报告结局系统在HIV感染者中的可行性:基于移动应用的试点研究的回顾性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 10;9:e71493. doi: 10.2196/71493.
3
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
4
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Development of a Comprehensive Decision Support Tool for Chemotherapy-Cycle Prescribing: Initial Usability Study.化疗周期处方综合决策支持工具的开发:初步可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 31;9:e62749. doi: 10.2196/62749.
7
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗银屑病关节炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(31):iii-iv, xiii-xvi, 1-239. doi: 10.3310/hta10310.
10
Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults.常规使用患者报告结局指标(PROMs)以改善成人常见精神障碍的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 13;7(7):CD011119. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011119.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient- vs Physician-Initiated Response to Symptom Monitoring and Health-Related Quality of Life: The SYMPRO-Lung Cluster Randomized Trial.患者与医生对症状监测和健康相关生活质量的反应:SYMPRO-Lung 聚类随机试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2428975. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28975.
2
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer Care: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.癌症护理中的患者报告结局测量:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2424793. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24793.
3
Examining the Effectiveness of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in People With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
评估电子患者报告结局在癌症患者中的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 31;26:e49089. doi: 10.2196/49089.
4
Optimization of alert notifications in electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) remote symptom monitoring systems (AFT-39).电子患者报告结局(ePRO)远程症状监测系统(AFT-39)中警报通知的优化。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jul;33(7):1985-1995. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03675-3. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
6
Learning to Overcome Barriers to Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Implementation: Lessons From the Field.学习克服电子患者报告结局实施障碍:来自现场的经验教训。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Jun;20(6):751-753. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00104. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
7
Recommendations to address respondent burden associated with patient-reported outcome assessment.关于减轻与患者报告结局评估相关的应答负担的建议。
Nat Med. 2024 Mar;30(3):650-659. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02827-9. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
8
Survey in radiation oncology departments in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: state of digitalization by 2023.德国、奥地利和瑞士放射肿瘤学部门的调查:2023 年的数字化现状。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2024 Jun;200(6):497-506. doi: 10.1007/s00066-023-02182-7. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
9
App-Controlled Treatment Monitoring and Support for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy: Results From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.应用程序控制的治疗监测和支持对头颈部癌症放疗患者的作用:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 19;25:e46189. doi: 10.2196/46189.
10
Usability of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Older Patients With Cancer: Secondary Analysis of Data from an Observational Single Center Study.电子患者报告结局测量工具在老年癌症患者中的可用性:一项观察性单中心研究数据的二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 21;25:e49476. doi: 10.2196/49476.