Suppr超能文献

为在照料患有重度神经认知障碍的个体中使用社交机器人制定伦理框架:一项定性研究。

Development of an ethical framework for the use of social robots in the care of individuals with major neurocognitive disorders: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Ware Caitlin, Rigaud Anne-Sophie, Blavette Lauriane, Damnée Souad, Dacunha Sebastien, Lenoir Hermine, Piccoli Matthieu, Cristancho-Lacroix Victoria, Pino Maribel

机构信息

Service Gériatrie 1&2, Centre Mémoire de Ressources Et Recherches Ile de France-Broca, AP-HP, Hôpital Broca, F-75013, Paris, France.

Centre d'Expertise National en Stimulation Cognitive (CEN STIMCO), 54 Rue Pascal, Paris, 75013, France.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05891-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing use of social robots in geriatric care, there is a lack of standardized ethical guidelines to inform and guide professionals in their implementation.

OBJECTIVE

This study has two main objectives: 1) to understand how professionals conducting social robot interventions (SRIs) perceive and approach the ethical issues linked to the use of social robots with older adults, and 2) to establish ethical guidelines to help professionals carry out SRIs with older adults with major neurocognitive disorders.

METHODS

For this descriptive qualitative study, we conducted interviews with 20 healthcare professionals working in geriatric facilities. The interviews were recorded and transcribed, and an inductive content analysis was performed to identify certain themes and recommendations concerning the use of social robots with older adults with major neurocognitive disorders.

RESULTS

Six main themes emerged from the analysis of the interviews: deciding on and preparing the robot's integration into an institutional setting, preparing a robotic intervention, introducing the robot to older adults, obtaining consent or assent, conducting a robotic-mediated intervention, and observing the effects of social robot use.

CONCLUSION

The use of social robots should be guided by the same ethical guidelines followed in all therapeutic interventions; however, healthcare professionals express a need for special training and preparation for SRIs in geriatric settings. We have drafted several preliminary recommendations for carrying out SRIs with older adults with major neurocognitive disorders. Future research should focus on standardizing guidelines and creating an accessible format for training.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRB N°: 00012021-110.

摘要

背景

尽管社交机器人在老年护理中的应用越来越广泛,但仍缺乏标准化的伦理准则来指导专业人员进行实施。

目的

本研究有两个主要目标:1)了解进行社交机器人干预(SRI)的专业人员如何看待和处理与老年人使用社交机器人相关的伦理问题,以及2)制定伦理准则,以帮助专业人员对患有严重神经认知障碍的老年人进行SRI。

方法

对于这项描述性定性研究,我们采访了20名在老年护理机构工作的医疗保健专业人员。采访进行了录音和转录,并进行了归纳性内容分析,以确定与患有严重神经认知障碍的老年人使用社交机器人相关的某些主题和建议。

结果

对采访的分析得出了六个主要主题:决定并准备将机器人融入机构环境、准备机器人干预、向老年人介绍机器人、获得同意或认可、进行机器人介导的干预以及观察社交机器人使用的效果。

结论

社交机器人的使用应以所有治疗干预中遵循的相同伦理准则为指导;然而,医疗保健专业人员表示需要在老年护理环境中对SRI进行特殊培训和准备。我们已经起草了一些针对患有严重神经认知障碍的老年人进行SRI的初步建议。未来的研究应侧重于规范准则并创建易于获取的培训形式。

试验注册

IRB编号:00012021 - 110。

相似文献

3
Ethical risks in robot health education: A qualitative study.机器人健康教育中的伦理风险:一项定性研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2025 May;32(3):913-930. doi: 10.1177/09697330241270829. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验