• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别特征,提高老年人对机器人的接受度:混合方法研究。

Identifying Features that Enhance Older Adults' Acceptance of Robots: A Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Gerontology. 2019;65(4):441-450. doi: 10.1159/000494881. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1159/000494881
PMID:30844813
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With global aging, robots are considered a promising solution for handling the shortage of aged care and companionships. However, these technologies would serve little purpose if their intended users do not accept them. While the socioemotional selectivity theory predicts that older adults would accept robots that offer emotionally meaningful relationships, selective optimization with compensation model predicts that older adults would accept robots that compensate for their functional losses.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to understand older adults' expectations for robots and to compare older adults' acceptance ratings for 2 existing robots: one of them is a more human-like and more service-oriented robot and the other one is a more animal-like and more companion-oriented robot.

METHODS

A mixed methods study was conducted with 33 healthy, community-dwelling Taiwanese older adults (age range: 59-82 years). Participants first completed a semi-structured interview regarding their ideal robot. After receiving information about the 2 existing robots, they then completed the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology questionnaires to report their pre-implementation acceptance of the 2 robots.

RESULTS

Interviews were transcribed for conventional content analysis with satisfactory inter-rater reliability. From the interview data, a collection of older adults' ideal robot characteristics emerged with highlights of humanlike qualities. From the questionnaire data, respondents showed a higher level of acceptance toward the more service-oriented robot than the more companion-oriented robot in terms of attitude, perceived adaptiveness, and perceived usefulness. From the mixed methods analyses, the finding that older adults had a higher level of positive attitude towards the more service-oriented robot than the more companion-oriented robot was predicted by higher expectation or preference for robots with more service-related functions.

CONCLUSION

This study identified older adults' preference toward more functional and humanlike robots. Our findings provide practical suggestions for future robot designs that target the older population.

摘要

背景

随着全球老龄化,机器人被认为是解决老年护理和陪伴短缺问题的有前途的解决方案。然而,如果他们的目标用户不接受这些技术,这些技术就没有什么用处。虽然社会情绪选择理论预测老年人会接受提供情感意义关系的机器人,但选择性优化补偿模型预测老年人会接受补偿其功能丧失的机器人。

目的

本研究旨在了解老年人对机器人的期望,并比较老年人对 2 种现有机器人的接受度评分:一种是更类人化、更以服务为导向的机器人,另一种是更类动物化、更以陪伴为导向的机器人。

方法

一项混合方法研究纳入了 33 名健康的、居住在社区的台湾老年人(年龄范围:59-82 岁)。参与者首先完成了一项关于他们理想机器人的半结构化访谈。在收到有关 2 种现有机器人的信息后,他们完成了统一接受和使用技术理论的问卷,以报告他们对这 2 种机器人的预先实施接受程度。

结果

访谈记录进行了常规内容分析,具有令人满意的内部一致性。从访谈数据中,出现了一系列老年人理想机器人的特征,突出了类人品质。从问卷数据来看,在态度、感知适应性和感知有用性方面,受访者对更以服务为导向的机器人的接受程度高于更以陪伴为导向的机器人。从混合方法分析中可以看出,老年人对更以服务为导向的机器人的积极态度水平高于更以陪伴为导向的机器人,这是由对具有更多服务相关功能的机器人的更高期望或偏好所预测的。

结论

本研究确定了老年人对更具功能性和类人化机器人的偏好。我们的研究结果为针对老年人群体的未来机器人设计提供了实用建议。

相似文献

1
Identifying Features that Enhance Older Adults' Acceptance of Robots: A Mixed Methods Study.识别特征,提高老年人对机器人的接受度:混合方法研究。
Gerontology. 2019;65(4):441-450. doi: 10.1159/000494881. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
2
Age-Related Differences in the Uncanny Valley Effect.年龄相关的“恐怖谷效应”差异。
Gerontology. 2020;66(4):382-392. doi: 10.1159/000507812. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Needs and Preferences of Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Taiwan for Companion Robots and Pets: Survey Study.台湾中老年群体对陪伴机器人和宠物的需求和偏好:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 11;23(6):e23471. doi: 10.2196/23471.
4
Older adults' experiences and perceptions of living with Bomy, an assistive dailycare robot: a qualitative study.老年人使用 Bomy 这款日常辅助机器人的体验和看法:一项定性研究。
Assist Technol. 2022 Jul 4;34(4):487-497. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1877210. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
Improving the Social Well-Being of Single Older Adults Using the LOVOT Social Robot: Qualitative Phenomenological Study.利用 LOVOT 社交机器人提高单身老年人的社会幸福感:定性现象学研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 23;11:e56669. doi: 10.2196/56669.
6
Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting.老年人对辅助机器人的接受度:在生活实验室环境中进行为期 1 个月的人机交互混合方法研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 May 8;9:801-11. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S56435. eCollection 2014.
7
The Effects of Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use of Humanoid Robots in Care for Older Adults: Postinteraction Cross-Sectional Study.利益相关者认知对老年护理用人形机器人使用的影响:互动后横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 4;25:e46617. doi: 10.2196/46617.
8
Community-dwelling older adults' needs and acceptance regarding the use of robot technology to assist with daily living performance.社区居住的老年人对使用机器人技术辅助日常生活表现的需求和接受程度。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1227-7.
9
Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers.用于协助日常活动的机器人:阿尔茨海默病老年人及其照料者的观点。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Jan;29(1):67-79. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001435. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
10
Identifying Preferred Appearance and Functional Requirements of Aged Care Robots Among Older Chinese Immigrants: Cross-Sectional Study.识别中国老年移民对老年护理机器人的外观偏好和功能需求:横断面研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Nov 8;6:e48646. doi: 10.2196/48646.

引用本文的文献

1
Human Versus Robot Assistance: Older Adults' Preferences for Assistance on Domestic Tasks.人类与机器人协助:老年人对家务任务协助的偏好
Sage Open Aging. 2025 Jul 30;11:30495334251360417. doi: 10.1177/30495334251360417. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Acceptability and Usability of a Socially Assistive Robot Integrated With a Large Language Model for Enhanced Human-Robot Interaction in a Geriatric Care Institution: Mixed Methods Evaluation.在老年护理机构中集成大语言模型以增强人机交互的社交辅助机器人的可接受性和可用性:混合方法评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 1;12:e76496. doi: 10.2196/76496.
3
Effectiveness of Robot Care Intervention and Maintenance for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
机器人护理干预与维护对痴呆症患者的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Innov Aging. 2024 Dec 21;9(3):igae110. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae110. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluating Human-Robot Interactions to Support Healthy Aging-in-Place.评估人机交互以支持健康的就地养老。
J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Dec 16:7334648241301485. doi: 10.1177/07334648241301485.
5
Ethical implications in using robots among older adults living with dementia.在患有痴呆症的老年人中使用机器人的伦理问题。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 25;15:1436273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1436273. eCollection 2024.
6
Acceptance of care technologies to support activities of daily living by middle-aged and older adults in Japan: A cross-sectional study.日本中老年人对支持日常生活活动的护理技术的接受度:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Sep 8;3:100042. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100042. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Acceptance of a robotic system for nursing care: a cross-sectional survey with professional nurses, care recipients and relatives.护理机器人系统的接受度:一项针对专业护士、护理对象及其亲属的横断面调查。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 14;23(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01849-5.
8
"Ick bin een Berlina": dialect proficiency impacts a robot's trustworthiness and competence evaluation.“我是柏林人”:方言能力会影响对机器人的可信度和能力评估。 (注:原文中“Ick bin een Berlina”表述有误,正确的德语应该是“Ich bin ein Berliner” ,意思是“我是一个柏林人” )
Front Robot AI. 2024 Jan 29;10:1241519. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1241519. eCollection 2023.
9
Determinants of Attitude to a Humanoid Social Robot in Care for Older Adults: A Post-Interaction Study.老年人护理中对人形社交机器人态度的决定因素:互动后研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Sep 8;29:e941205. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941205.
10
Care Robotics: An Assessment of Professional Perception in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic.护理机器人技术:面对新冠疫情的专业认知评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;11(7):946. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11070946.