• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

葡萄牙临床研究专业人员能力评估及改善临床研究的建议。

Assessment of competencies of clinical research professionals and proposals to improve clinical research in Portugal.

作者信息

Bogas Mónica, Antas Joana, Magalhães Cátia, Revige Mafalda, Guerra Liliana, Ribeiro Cheila, Eça Rita Cunha, Nunes Filipa, Lopes Ana, Costa Luís, Gonçalves Mónica, Pedrosa Jorge, Capela Andreia, Gregório Tiago, Dias Patrícia, Alfaro Tiago, Pais Ana, Soares Rui, Queirós Ana, Torres Tiago, Assis Joana, Maia Joana, Ferreira Margarida, Horta Luís, Carreiro Rita, Almeida João, Meireles Maria João, Loução Carla, António Sofia, Lopes Catarina, Coelho Pedro, Costa Rita, Santana Margarida, Sousa Nuno

机构信息

Roche Portugal, Amadora, Portugal.

AICIB - Agency for Clinical Research and Biomedical Innovation, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 8;16:1578955. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1578955. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1578955
PMID:40264669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12012263/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies are coordinated by multidisciplinary teams, which often lack adequate training and competencies. In this study, ROCHE and AICIB (Agency for Clinical Research and Biomedical Innovation) conducted a self-assessment survey aiming to evaluate the competency of clinical research professionals to conduct clinical research in Portugal and promote the identification of key actions to address priority gaps.

METHODS

Clinical research professionals from 10 Portuguese centres answered an electronic survey, adapted and translated from the Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency (JTFCTC) framework. Representatives of the centres, ROCHE and AICIB held a meeting to discuss the survey results, identify priority gaps and propose recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 109 participants answered the questionnaire with the following national geographical distribution: North ( = 46), Centre Region ( = 16), and Lisbon metropolitan area ( = 47). A considerable proportion were Investigators (44.0%) and had more than 10 years of experience (34.9%). The eight JTFCTC Domains scored under 60% in the level of knowledge, with Investigators achieving overall higher scores. To address these gaps, key actions were proposed, such as enhancing training and educational opportunities, fostering collaboration and networking, and investing in infrastructure and resources.

CONCLUSION

This study was the first to assess clinical trial competency in Portugal, registering a high participation rate. The study highlights the need to develop a national plan of action, in a collaborative effort, between clinical research centres, universities, industry, regulatory authorities, national agencies, and patient organizations. This will not only contribute to elevate the quality of studies but also improve compliance with international standards, ultimately benefiting both researchers and patients.

摘要

背景

临床研究由多学科团队协调开展,而这些团队往往缺乏足够的培训和能力。在本研究中,罗氏公司和临床研究与生物医学创新局(AICIB)开展了一项自我评估调查,旨在评估葡萄牙临床研究专业人员开展临床研究的能力,并推动确定解决优先差距的关键行动。

方法

来自葡萄牙10个中心的临床研究专业人员回答了一项电子调查问卷,该问卷是根据临床试验能力联合工作组(JTFCTC)框架改编并翻译的。各中心的代表、罗氏公司和AICIB召开了一次会议,讨论调查结果,确定优先差距并提出建议。

结果

共有109名参与者回答了问卷,其国家地理分布如下:北部( = 46)、中部地区( = 16)和里斯本大都市区( = 47)。相当一部分是研究者(44.0%),且有超过10年的经验(34.9%)。JTFCTC的八个领域在知识水平方面得分低于60%,研究者的总体得分更高。为解决这些差距,提出了关键行动,如增加培训和教育机会、促进合作与网络建设以及投资基础设施和资源。

结论

本研究是首次对葡萄牙的临床试验能力进行评估,参与率很高。该研究强调需要临床研究中心、大学、行业、监管机构、国家机构和患者组织共同努力制定一项国家行动计划。这不仅将有助于提高研究质量,还将改善对国际标准的遵守情况,最终使研究人员和患者都受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91b/12012263/43b8ff788627/fphar-16-1578955-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91b/12012263/43b8ff788627/fphar-16-1578955-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91b/12012263/43b8ff788627/fphar-16-1578955-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of competencies of clinical research professionals and proposals to improve clinical research in Portugal.葡萄牙临床研究专业人员能力评估及改善临床研究的建议。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 8;16:1578955. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1578955. eCollection 2025.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Minding the gaps: assessing and addressing clinical research core competencies across a network of Canadian cancer centres.关注差距:评估并解决加拿大癌症中心网络中的临床研究核心能力问题。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Dec 8;14:1294335. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1294335. eCollection 2023.
4
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
5
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
6
Self-assessed Competencies of Clinical Research Professionals and Recommendations for Further Education and Training.临床研究专业人员的自我评估能力以及继续教育与培训建议
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Jul;56(4):607-615. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00395-z. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
7
Education and training of clinical research professionals and the evolution of the Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency.临床研究专业人员的教育与培训以及临床试验能力联合工作组的演变
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 18;15:1291675. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1291675. eCollection 2024.
8
Leveling the Joint Task Force Core Competencies for Clinical Research Professionals.关节研究工作组核心能力水平评估——临床研究专业人员
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Jan;54(1):1-20. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00024-2. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
9
Joint Task Force Core Competency Framework Adoption Process at a National Level: A Survey of Ukrainian-Based Clinical Research Professionals.国家层面联合工作组核心能力框架采用过程:基于乌克兰的临床研究专业人员调查。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):814-821. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00428-7. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
10
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Trials in Portugal: Past and Future. Position Paper from the Colleges of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Medicine.葡萄牙的临床试验:过去与未来。临床药理学与药物医学学院立场文件
Acta Med Port. 2024 Sep 2;37(9):585-588. doi: 10.20344/amp.21371. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
The competency index for clinical research professionals: a potential tool for competency-based clinical research academic program evaluation.临床研究专业人员的能力指数:一种基于能力的临床研究学术项目评估的潜在工具。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 26;11:1291667. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1291667. eCollection 2024.
3
Enhancing the clinical research workforce: a collaborative approach with human resources.
加强临床研究人员队伍:与人力资源部门的协作方法。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 7;15:1295155. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1295155. eCollection 2024.
4
Education and training of clinical research professionals and the evolution of the Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency.临床研究专业人员的教育与培训以及临床试验能力联合工作组的演变
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 18;15:1291675. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1291675. eCollection 2024.
5
Development and implementation of an on-demand competency-based onboarding program for clinical research professionals in academic medicine.为学术医学领域的临床研究专业人员开发并实施基于能力的按需入职培训计划。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 22;10:1249527. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1249527. eCollection 2023.
6
Reimagining the joint task force core competency framework for rural and frontier clinical research professionals conducting hybrid and decentralized trials.重新构想农村和偏远地区临床研究专业人员开展混合式和去中心化试验的联合特遣部队核心能力框架。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Dec 21;14:1309073. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1309073. eCollection 2023.
7
Minding the gaps: assessing and addressing clinical research core competencies across a network of Canadian cancer centres.关注差距:评估并解决加拿大癌症中心网络中的临床研究核心能力问题。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Dec 8;14:1294335. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1294335. eCollection 2023.
8
The development of a clinical research educational training for community health workers using the joint task force for clinical trial competency framework.利用临床试验能力框架联合工作组为社区卫生工作者开展临床研究教育培训。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Dec 7;14:1295281. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1295281. eCollection 2023.
9
Tackling standardization in clinical research workforce hiring using competency-based job classifications.利用基于能力的职位分类解决临床研究人员招聘中的标准化问题。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Nov 6;7(1):e244. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.672. eCollection 2023.
10
Crisis of the Clinical Trials Staff Attrition After the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情后临床试验人员流失的危机。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Aug;19(8):533-535. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00152. Epub 2023 Jun 7.