Suppr超能文献

骨盆环损伤患者的工作和社会参与水平如何?一项为期两年的前瞻性队列研究。

What is the level of work and societal participation in patients with pelvic ring injuries? A two-year prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Therrien Camryn C, Ten Duis Kaj, Banierink Hester, Trouwborst N M, de Vries Jean-Paul Pm, IJpma Frank Fa, Reininga Inge Hf

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2025 Jun;39(6):808-818. doi: 10.1177/02692155251333535. Epub 2025 Apr 23.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo provide insight into the impact of pelvic ring injuries on patients' work and school activities and participation in society.DesignProspective-cohort study.SettingA level-1 trauma center in the Netherlands.Participants195 patients with a pelvic ring injury.Main measuresThe work or school activities and participation in society domains of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Score II (WHO-DAS II) were administered at admission (pre-injury score), 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years following the injury.ResultsBefore the injury, the median scores were 80 for both work or school activities and participation in society. The scores 3 months after the injury were 40 and 60, respectively, but both improved to 75 after 2 years. The percentage of non-recovered patients decreased over time, from 45% to 35% for work or school activities and from 34% to 18% for participation in society between 6 months and 2 years. At work or school, patients struggled to complete daily tasks and important activities as efficiently and effectively as needed. Regarding participation in society, patients struggled with the amount of time spent managing their injuries, joining community activities, and doing things for relaxation. No relationships between patients or injury characteristics and recovery were identified one year following the injury.ConclusionsPelvic ring injuries greatly impact patients' work or school activities and participation in society. However, these domains greatly improve within the first two years, with many individuals regaining their pre-injury capabilities. Still, some continue to experience long-term difficulties in participation.

摘要

目的

深入了解骨盆环损伤对患者工作、学习活动及社会参与的影响。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

荷兰的一家一级创伤中心。

参与者

195例骨盆环损伤患者。

主要测量指标

在入院时(伤前评分)、受伤后3个月、6个月、1年和2年,采用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHO-DAS II)的工作或学习活动以及社会参与领域进行评估。

结果

受伤前,工作或学习活动以及社会参与的中位数评分均为80分。受伤后3个月时,这两项评分分别为40分和60分,但2年后均提高到75分。未恢复患者的比例随时间下降,在6个月至2年期间,工作或学习活动方面从45%降至35%,社会参与方面从34%降至18%。在工作或学习中,患者难以按需要高效且有效地完成日常任务和重要活动。在社会参与方面,患者在管理伤痛所花费的时间、参加社区活动以及进行放松活动等方面存在困难。受伤一年后,未发现患者或损伤特征与恢复之间存在关联。

结论

骨盆环损伤对患者的工作或学习活动以及社会参与有重大影响。然而,这些领域在头两年内有显著改善,许多人恢复到伤前能力。尽管如此,仍有一些人在参与方面继续经历长期困难。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/12141768/7f01e92fce5d/10.1177_02692155251333535-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
What is the level of work and societal participation in patients with pelvic ring injuries? A two-year prospective cohort study.
Clin Rehabil. 2025 Jun;39(6):808-818. doi: 10.1177/02692155251333535. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug;48(4):2849-2857. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01893-3. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
3
Musculoskeletal recovery 5 years after severe injury: long term problems are common.
Injury. 2002 Mar;33(2):111-5. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00047-x.
4
Functional outcome of patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures stabilized with open reduction and internal fixation.
J Trauma. 1995 Nov;39(5):838-44; discussion 844-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199511000-00006.
5
Functional and return to work outcomes following major trauma involving severe pelvic ring fracture.
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Oct;85(10):749-54. doi: 10.1111/ans.12700. Epub 2014 May 30.
7
Are work return and leaves of absence predictable after an unstable pelvic ring injury?
J Orthop Traumatol. 2016 Jun;17(2):169-73. doi: 10.1007/s10195-015-0379-2. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
9
Prognostic factors and quality of life after pelvic fractures. The Brabant Injury Outcome Surveillance (BIOS) study.
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 11;15(6):e0233690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233690. eCollection 2020.
10
[Associated injuries in severe pelvic trauma].
Unfallchirurg. 2000 Jul;103(7):572-81. doi: 10.1007/s001130050585.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug;48(4):2849-2857. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01893-3. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
2
Factors influencing participation among adults aging with long-term physical disability.
Disabil Health J. 2022 Jan;15(1):101169. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101169. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
3
Motivation and Healthy Aging at Work.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Sep 13;76(Suppl 2):S145-S156. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab042.
4
Psychometric properties of Meaningful Activity Participation Assessment (MAPA) in chronic stroke survivors.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021 Sep;28(6):422-431. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1834275. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
5
Patient-reported physical functioning and quality of life after pelvic ring injury: A systematic review of the literature.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 17;15(7):e0233226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233226. eCollection 2020.
6
Global outcome after traumatic brain injury in a prospective cohort.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;186:105526. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105526. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
7
Long-term physical functioning and quality of life after pelvic ring injuries.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Sep;139(9):1225-1233. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03170-2. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
10
Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018.
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验