• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨盆环损伤患者的工作和社会参与水平如何?一项为期两年的前瞻性队列研究。

What is the level of work and societal participation in patients with pelvic ring injuries? A two-year prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Therrien Camryn C, Ten Duis Kaj, Banierink Hester, Trouwborst N M, de Vries Jean-Paul Pm, IJpma Frank Fa, Reininga Inge Hf

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2025 Jun;39(6):808-818. doi: 10.1177/02692155251333535. Epub 2025 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1177/02692155251333535
PMID:40266570
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12141768/
Abstract

ObjectiveTo provide insight into the impact of pelvic ring injuries on patients' work and school activities and participation in society.DesignProspective-cohort study.SettingA level-1 trauma center in the Netherlands.Participants195 patients with a pelvic ring injury.Main measuresThe work or school activities and participation in society domains of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Score II (WHO-DAS II) were administered at admission (pre-injury score), 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years following the injury.ResultsBefore the injury, the median scores were 80 for both work or school activities and participation in society. The scores 3 months after the injury were 40 and 60, respectively, but both improved to 75 after 2 years. The percentage of non-recovered patients decreased over time, from 45% to 35% for work or school activities and from 34% to 18% for participation in society between 6 months and 2 years. At work or school, patients struggled to complete daily tasks and important activities as efficiently and effectively as needed. Regarding participation in society, patients struggled with the amount of time spent managing their injuries, joining community activities, and doing things for relaxation. No relationships between patients or injury characteristics and recovery were identified one year following the injury.ConclusionsPelvic ring injuries greatly impact patients' work or school activities and participation in society. However, these domains greatly improve within the first two years, with many individuals regaining their pre-injury capabilities. Still, some continue to experience long-term difficulties in participation.

摘要

目的

深入了解骨盆环损伤对患者工作、学习活动及社会参与的影响。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

荷兰的一家一级创伤中心。

参与者

195例骨盆环损伤患者。

主要测量指标

在入院时(伤前评分)、受伤后3个月、6个月、1年和2年,采用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHO-DAS II)的工作或学习活动以及社会参与领域进行评估。

结果

受伤前,工作或学习活动以及社会参与的中位数评分均为80分。受伤后3个月时,这两项评分分别为40分和60分,但2年后均提高到75分。未恢复患者的比例随时间下降,在6个月至2年期间,工作或学习活动方面从45%降至35%,社会参与方面从34%降至18%。在工作或学习中,患者难以按需要高效且有效地完成日常任务和重要活动。在社会参与方面,患者在管理伤痛所花费的时间、参加社区活动以及进行放松活动等方面存在困难。受伤一年后,未发现患者或损伤特征与恢复之间存在关联。

结论

骨盆环损伤对患者的工作或学习活动以及社会参与有重大影响。然而,这些领域在头两年内有显著改善,许多人恢复到伤前能力。尽管如此,仍有一些人在参与方面继续经历长期困难。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/12141768/c1e541ef77ab/10.1177_02692155251333535-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/12141768/7f01e92fce5d/10.1177_02692155251333535-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/12141768/5702b15ee891/10.1177_02692155251333535-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/12141768/6319e6615c00/10.1177_02692155251333535-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/12141768/c1e541ef77ab/10.1177_02692155251333535-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/12141768/7f01e92fce5d/10.1177_02692155251333535-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/12141768/5702b15ee891/10.1177_02692155251333535-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/12141768/6319e6615c00/10.1177_02692155251333535-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6853/12141768/c1e541ef77ab/10.1177_02692155251333535-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
What is the level of work and societal participation in patients with pelvic ring injuries? A two-year prospective cohort study.骨盆环损伤患者的工作和社会参与水平如何?一项为期两年的前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2025 Jun;39(6):808-818. doi: 10.1177/02692155251333535. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study.骨盆环损伤对生活质量、身体和心理健康的影响:一项为期 2 年的前瞻性队列研究结果。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug;48(4):2849-2857. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01893-3. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
3
Musculoskeletal recovery 5 years after severe injury: long term problems are common.严重损伤5年后的肌肉骨骼恢复:长期问题很常见。
Injury. 2002 Mar;33(2):111-5. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00047-x.
4
Functional outcome of patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures stabilized with open reduction and internal fixation.采用切开复位内固定治疗的不稳定骨盆环骨折患者的功能预后。
J Trauma. 1995 Nov;39(5):838-44; discussion 844-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199511000-00006.
5
Functional and return to work outcomes following major trauma involving severe pelvic ring fracture.严重骨盆环骨折的重大创伤后的功能及重返工作结果
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Oct;85(10):749-54. doi: 10.1111/ans.12700. Epub 2014 May 30.
6
Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.与 ICF 参与和活动筛查量表以及 WHO 残疾评估量表 II 相比,评估康复参与的乌得勒支量表在脊髓损伤患者中的应用比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.236. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
7
Are work return and leaves of absence predictable after an unstable pelvic ring injury?不稳定骨盆环损伤后恢复工作和休假情况是否可预测?
J Orthop Traumatol. 2016 Jun;17(2):169-73. doi: 10.1007/s10195-015-0379-2. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
8
[Pelvic fractures: epidemiology, therapy and long-term outcome. Overview of the multicenter study of the Pelvis Study Group].[骨盆骨折:流行病学、治疗及长期预后。骨盆研究组多中心研究综述]
Unfallchirurg. 1996 Mar;99(3):160-7.
9
Prognostic factors and quality of life after pelvic fractures. The Brabant Injury Outcome Surveillance (BIOS) study.骨盆骨折预后因素和生活质量。布拉班特损伤结局监测(BIOS)研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 11;15(6):e0233690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233690. eCollection 2020.
10
[Associated injuries in severe pelvic trauma].[严重骨盆创伤的相关损伤]
Unfallchirurg. 2000 Jul;103(7):572-81. doi: 10.1007/s001130050585.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study.骨盆环损伤对生活质量、身体和心理健康的影响:一项为期 2 年的前瞻性队列研究结果。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug;48(4):2849-2857. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01893-3. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
2
Factors influencing participation among adults aging with long-term physical disability.影响长期身体残疾成年人参与的因素。
Disabil Health J. 2022 Jan;15(1):101169. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101169. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
3
Motivation and Healthy Aging at Work.
工作中的动机与健康老龄化
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Sep 13;76(Suppl 2):S145-S156. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab042.
4
Psychometric properties of Meaningful Activity Participation Assessment (MAPA) in chronic stroke survivors.意义活动参与评估(MAPA)在慢性脑卒中幸存者中的心理测量学特性。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021 Sep;28(6):422-431. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1834275. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
5
Patient-reported physical functioning and quality of life after pelvic ring injury: A systematic review of the literature.患者报告的骨盆环损伤后身体功能和生活质量:文献系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 17;15(7):e0233226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233226. eCollection 2020.
6
Global outcome after traumatic brain injury in a prospective cohort.前瞻性队列研究中创伤性脑损伤后的全球结局
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;186:105526. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105526. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
7
Long-term physical functioning and quality of life after pelvic ring injuries.骨盆环损伤后的长期身体功能和生活质量。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Sep;139(9):1225-1233. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03170-2. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
8
Comparing disability between traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury using the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 and the WHO minimal generic data set covering functioning and health.比较创伤性脑损伤和脊髓损伤之间的残疾程度,使用 WHODAS 2.0 的 12 项和涵盖功能和健康的世卫组织最小通用数据集。
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Dec;32(12):1676-1683. doi: 10.1177/0269215518785945. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
9
A comparison between WHODAS 2.0 and Modified Barthel Index: which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the recovery rate in orthopedic rehabilitation?世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0版与改良巴氏指数的比较:哪种工具更适合评估骨科康复中的残疾情况和恢复率?
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Jun 5;10:301-307. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S150526. eCollection 2018.
10
Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018.《骨折与脱位分类汇编 - 2018》
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063.