Forsyth Stewart
School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Formerly Medical Director and Consultant Paediatrician, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.
Ann Nutr Metab. 2025 Apr 23:1-5. doi: 10.1159/000546054.
Under the terms of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), governments are now required to enable all children to fulfil their full potential with the key principles being non-discrimination, the right to life and development, the best interests of the child, and the right to be heard. A recent statement by UNICEF indicated that implementation of the principles of the UNCRC provide a pathway for WHO, WHA, and UNICEF global infant feeding policy documents to be introduced into domestic law. But these documents are not recent and have not been updated, and they represent high levels of non-compliance. Moreover, do they actually comply with the principles set out in the UNCRC?
Global decisions on infant feeding are being made by organisations who are distant from family circumstances and primarily reflect the views of WHO/UNICEF and activist groups. Evidence of dismissal of public consultation is discriminatory, and an unwillingness to manage differences of opinion is a denial of the right to be heard.
National governments can serve the best interests of the child through sovereign rights, national responsibility and accountability, and development of national infant feeding policies that reflect UNCRC principles.
根据《联合国儿童权利公约》(UNCRC)的条款,各国政府现在必须使所有儿童能够充分发挥其潜力,关键原则包括不歧视、生命和发展权、儿童的最大利益以及被倾听的权利。联合国儿童基金会最近的一份声明指出,实施《联合国儿童权利公约》的原则为世界卫生组织(WHO)、世界卫生大会(WHA)和联合国儿童基金会的全球婴儿喂养政策文件引入国内法提供了一条途径。但这些文件并不新,也没有更新,而且它们显示出高度的不遵守情况。此外,它们是否真的符合《联合国儿童权利公约》规定的原则呢?
关于婴儿喂养的全球决策由远离家庭环境的组织做出,主要反映了世界卫生组织/联合国儿童基金会和激进组织的观点。无视公众咨询的证据具有歧视性,而不愿处理意见分歧则是对被倾听权利的否认。
各国政府可以通过主权权利、国家责任和问责制以及制定反映《联合国儿童权利公约》原则的国家婴儿喂养政策来维护儿童的最大利益。