Markowitz David M
Department of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 23;20(4):e0321666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321666. eCollection 2025.
Deception research has traditionally evaluated how individual differences like personality traits and demographics correlate with lying. However, the establishment of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) as an individual difference that also links to deception remains underexplored. To this end, the present study (N = 784 students) investigated the relationship between ACEs and deception in adulthood. Results indicated that individuals with more (versus less) adverse childhood experiences, particularly those involving maltreatment and victimization, reported more daily white and big lies, independent of aversive personality traits like narcissism and Machiavellianism. Consistent with other studies on individual differences and deception, the effect sizes were small, but systematic. Together, these findings support the dispositional honesty hypothesis, indicating that foundational childhood experiences and events can shape or signal deceptive behavior. Generally, the study contributes to our underexamined knowledge base of the developmental antecedents of lying, emphasizing the role that adversity plays during childhood to influence deceptive behavior beyond commonly studied personality traits.
传统上,欺骗研究评估了诸如人格特质和人口统计学等个体差异与说谎之间的关联。然而,将童年不良经历(ACEs)确立为一种也与欺骗有关的个体差异,这一点仍未得到充分探索。为此,本研究(N = 784名学生)调查了童年不良经历与成年期欺骗行为之间的关系。结果表明,童年不良经历较多(而非较少)的个体,尤其是那些经历过虐待和受害的个体,报告的日常小谎和大谎更多,这与自恋和马基雅维利主义等厌恶型人格特质无关。与其他关于个体差异和欺骗的研究一致,效应量较小,但具有系统性。总之,这些发现支持了特质诚实假设,表明童年时期的基础经历和事件可以塑造或预示欺骗行为。总体而言,该研究为我们尚未充分研究的说谎发展前因知识库做出了贡献,强调了童年时期的逆境在影响欺骗行为方面所起的作用,这种影响超出了通常研究的人格特质。