• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗糖尿病药物类型对新发抑郁症的影响:美国德克萨斯州的一项回顾性队列研究

Impact of antidiabetic medication type on a new episode of depression: a retrospective cohort study in Texas, USA.

作者信息

Chou Lin-Na, Raji Mukaila A, Holmes Holly M, Kuo Yong-Fang

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Division, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 23;15(4):e087694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087694.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087694
PMID:40268489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12020767/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the associations between antidiabetic medication type and a new episode of depression using 100% Texas Medicare database during 2009 and 2018.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A population-based study using the Texas Medicare data.

INTERVENTIONS

11 common antihyperglycaemic medication types, alone and in combinations: metformin-only, five non-metformin-containing regimens (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) only, sulfonylureas (SU) only, thiazolidinediones (TZD) only, SU/DPP4i and SU/TZD) and five metformin-containing combination treatments (metformin/DPP4i, metformin/SU, metformin/TZD, metformin/SU/DPP4i and metformin/SU/TZD).

PARTICIPANTS

This study included 59 057 type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients from a cohort of Texas Medicare beneficiaries who were aged ≥66 years, had consistent diabetes medication intake, were not diagnosed with depression or prescribed antidepressants during the 2-year look-back period and received regular care from Medicare providers.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was a new episode of depression, identified by a new depression diagnosis during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 59 057 T2D patients (mean (SD) age, 75.4 (6.4) years; 30 798 (52.1%) female) were followed up to 96 months. Of these, 22.5% patients had a new episode of depression at the 5-year follow-up. Compared with the metformin-only group, patients in the non-metformin-containing regimens had a higher risk of new episode depression (HR: 1.17, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.30 for DPP4i-only; HR: 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.12 for SU-only), but there was no significant difference among patients receiving metformin-containing combination therapy. Metformin/TZD and metformin/SU/DPP4i combination treatments had a lower risk of new episodes of depression than metformin-only (HR: 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99 and HR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.98 separately). The same direction of association was observed in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective cohort study found that T2D patients treated with metformin/TZD and metformin/SU/DPP4i had the lowest risk of new episodes of depression. These findings suggest that certain combinations of metformin with other antidiabetic medications may be associated with a reduced risk of new-onset depression. Therefore, it could be beneficial to incorporate depression risk evaluation into routine diabetes care and consider it in the decision-making process for diabetes medication types, especially when deprescribing metformin.

摘要

目的

利用2009年至2018年德州医疗保险100%数据库,研究抗糖尿病药物类型与新发抑郁症之间的关联。

设计

一项回顾性队列研究。

背景

一项基于德州医疗保险数据的人群研究。

干预措施

11种常见的降糖药物类型,单独使用或联合使用:仅二甲双胍、5种不含二甲双胍的治疗方案(仅二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4i)、仅磺脲类(SU)、仅噻唑烷二酮类(TZD)、SU/DPP4i和SU/TZD)以及5种含二甲双胍的联合治疗方案(二甲双胍/DPP4i、二甲双胍/SU、二甲双胍/TZD、二甲双胍/SU/DPP4i和二甲双胍/SU/TZD)。

参与者

本研究纳入了59057名来自德州医疗保险受益人群队列的2型糖尿病(T2D)患者,这些患者年龄≥66岁,糖尿病药物摄入持续稳定,在2年回顾期内未被诊断为抑郁症或未开具抗抑郁药,且接受医疗保险提供者的常规护理。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是新发抑郁症,通过随访期间新的抑郁症诊断来确定。

结果

共对59057名T2D患者(平均(标准差)年龄,75.4(6.4)岁;30798名(52.1%)女性)进行了长达96个月的随访。其中,22.5%的患者在5年随访时有新发抑郁症。与仅使用二甲双胍组相比,不含二甲双胍的治疗方案中的患者新发抑郁症风险更高(仅DPP4i组:HR:1.17,95%CI 1.05至1.30;仅SU组:HR:1.06,95%CI 1.01至1.12),但接受含二甲双胍联合治疗的患者之间无显著差异。二甲双胍/TZD和二甲双胍/SU/DPP4i联合治疗方案的新发抑郁症风险低于仅使用二甲双胍组(分别为HR:0.88,95%CI 0.78至0.99和HR:0.83,95%CI 0.71至0.98)。敏感性分析中观察到相同的关联方向。

结论

这项回顾性队列研究发现,接受二甲双胍/TZD和二甲双胍/SU/DPP4i治疗的T2D患者新发抑郁症风险最低。这些发现表明,二甲双胍与其他抗糖尿病药物的某些联合使用可能与新发抑郁症风险降低有关。因此,将抑郁症风险评估纳入常规糖尿病护理并在糖尿病药物类型决策过程中加以考虑可能是有益的,尤其是在停用二甲双胍时。

相似文献

1
Impact of antidiabetic medication type on a new episode of depression: a retrospective cohort study in Texas, USA.抗糖尿病药物类型对新发抑郁症的影响:美国德克萨斯州的一项回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 23;15(4):e087694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087694.
2
Intensification with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, insulin, or thiazolidinediones and risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases, and severe hypoglycemia in patients on metformin-sulfonylurea dual therapy: A retrospective cohort study.在二甲双胍-磺酰脲类双重疗法的患者中,强化使用二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂、胰岛素或噻唑烷二酮类药物与全因死亡率、心血管疾病和严重低血糖的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 26;16(12):e1002999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002999. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Real-world comparison of mono and dual combination therapies of metformin, sulfonylurea, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors using a common data model: A retrospective observational study.使用通用数据模型对二甲双胍、磺酰脲类药物和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂的单药和联合治疗进行真实世界比较:一项回顾性观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 25;101(8):e28823. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028823.
4
Progression to insulin for patients with diabetes mellitus using the Texas Medicaid database.使用德克萨斯州医疗补助数据库观察糖尿病患者使用胰岛素的进展情况。
Clin Ther. 2011 Dec;33(12):2016-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.10.018. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
5
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor compared with sulfonylurea in combination with metformin: cardiovascular and renal outcomes in a propensity-matched cohort study.二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂与磺脲类药物联合二甲双胍比较:倾向评分匹配队列研究中的心血管和肾脏结局。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 11;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0835-z.
6
Important differences in the durability of glycaemic response among second-line treatment options when added to metformin in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.2型糖尿病患者在二甲双胍基础上加用二线治疗方案时血糖反应耐久性的重要差异:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Med. 2016;48(4):224-34. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2016.1157263. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
Progression to insulin for patients with diabetes mellitus on dual oral antidiabetic therapy using the US Department of Defense Database.美国国防部数据库中使用双重口服抗糖尿病药物的糖尿病患者进展为胰岛素治疗。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Oct;15(10):901-5. doi: 10.1111/dom.12103. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
8
Cardiovascular events associated with second-line anti-diabetes treatments: analysis of real-world Korean data.与二线抗糖尿病治疗相关的心血管事件:真实世界韩国数据的分析。
Diabet Med. 2017 Sep;34(9):1235-1243. doi: 10.1111/dme.13384. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
9
Factors Associated with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treatment Choice Across Four European Countries.四种欧洲国家 2 型糖尿病治疗选择的相关因素
Clin Ther. 2017 Nov;39(11):2296-2310.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
10
Metformin combined with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or metformin combined with sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real world analysis of the South Korean national cohort.二甲双胍联合二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂或二甲双胍联合磺酰脲类药物治疗 2 型糖尿病患者:韩国全国队列的真实世界分析。
Metabolism. 2018 Aug;85:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Diabetes Medication Taking and Incidence of Depression in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study from 2010 to 2018.2010 年至 2018 年的回顾性队列研究:2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病药物治疗趋势与抑郁发病的关系。
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Apr;31(2):192-201. doi: 10.1007/s12529-023-10172-3. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
2
Association between visit-to-visit fasting glycemic variability and depression: a retrospective cohort study in a representative Korean population without diabetes.空腹血糖波动与抑郁的关联:一项在无糖尿病的代表性韩国人群中的回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 4;12(1):18692. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22302-0.
3
Diabetes, antidiabetic medications and risk of depression - A population-based cohort and nested case-control study.
糖尿病、抗糖尿病药物与抑郁症风险——基于人群的队列研究和巢式病例对照研究。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022 Jun;140:105715. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105715. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: .9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S111-S124. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S009.
5
Antidiabetes Agents and Incident Depression: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.抗糖尿病药物与新发抑郁:一项全国性基于人群的研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Dec;43(12):3050-3060. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1561. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
6
Alleviation of Depression by Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Through the Regulation of Neuroinflammation, Neurotransmitters, Neurogenesis, and Synaptic Function.胰高血糖素样肽-1通过调节神经炎症、神经递质、神经发生和突触功能来缓解抑郁症。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Aug 14;11:1270. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01270. eCollection 2020.
7
The Bidirectional Relationship of Depression and Inflammation: Double Trouble.抑郁和炎症的双向关系:双重麻烦。
Neuron. 2020 Jul 22;107(2):234-256. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Potential role of insulin on the pathogenesis of depression.胰岛素在抑郁症发病机制中的潜在作用。
Cell Prolif. 2020 May;53(5):e12806. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12806. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
9
Neuromodulatory effects of anti-diabetes medications: A mechanistic review.抗糖尿病药物的神经调节作用:机制综述。
Pharmacol Res. 2020 Feb;152:104611. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104611. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
10
Association between use of oral hypoglycemic agents in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of depression: A retrospective cohort study.日本 2 型糖尿病患者使用口服降糖药与抑郁风险的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2019 Nov 21;7(6):e00536. doi: 10.1002/prp2.536. eCollection 2019 Dec.