Deboeuf Louise, Kalamarides Michel, Sterkers Olivier, Law-Ye Bruno, Lahlou Ghizlène, Bernardeschi Daniele, Alciato Lauranne
Department of Neurosurgery, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 50/52 Bd Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université, UPMC University, Paris 6, 75005, Paris, France.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Apr 24;167(1):119. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06519-2.
Cerebrospinal fluid leak can occur after retrosigmoid craniectomy and lead to substantial patient morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare two closure techniques for vestibular schwannoma resection in terms of cerebrospinal fluid leak and other procedure-related issues.
This retrospective monocentric study included patients who underwent surgery for vestibular schwannoma resection via a retrosigmoid approach by the same oto-neurosurgical team. Before 2019, the retrosigmoid approach consisted of a craniectomy and the closure involved autologous abdominal fat graft obliteration (previous procedure). After 2019, the authors performed a craniotomy and used S53P4 bioactive glass granules to close the craniotomy site (new procedure).
We included 193 patients, 79 with the previous procedure and 114 the new procedure. Cerebrospinal fluid leak developed postoperatively in 3 patients with the new procedure and 14 with the previous procedure (p < 0.01). Need for surgical revision to treat the leak was lower with the new than previous procedure (1 vs 6 patients, p = 0.02) and the median length of hospital stay was reduced by 2 days with the new procedure (< 0.001).
The craniotomy/bioactive glass obliteration technique was associated with less cerebrospinal fluid leak as compared with craniectomy/autologous fat graft obliteration, less revision surgery and a shorter hospital stay.
乙状窦后开颅术后可发生脑脊液漏,并导致患者出现严重并发症。本研究旨在比较两种用于前庭神经鞘瘤切除术的闭合技术在脑脊液漏及其他与手术相关问题方面的差异。
这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了由同一耳神经外科团队经乙状窦后入路进行前庭神经鞘瘤切除术的患者。2019年之前,乙状窦后入路由开颅术组成,闭合方式为自体腹部脂肪移植填充(既往手术方式)。2019年之后,作者实施开颅术并使用S53P4生物活性玻璃颗粒闭合开颅部位(新手术方式)。
我们纳入了193例患者,79例行既往手术方式,114例行新手术方式。新手术方式术后有3例发生脑脊液漏,既往手术方式有14例发生脑脊液漏(p<0.01)。新手术方式因漏液进行手术修复的需求低于既往手术方式(1例对6例,p=0.02),且新手术方式的中位住院时间缩短了2天(<0.001)。
与开颅术/自体脂肪移植填充相比,开颅术/生物活性玻璃填充技术导致的脑脊液漏更少,修复手术更少,住院时间更短。