Warrington S J
Arzneimittelforschung. 1985;35(5):781-3.
Phases I, II and III of the development of a new drug are briefly described. The limitations of dose tolerance studies in Phase I are considered in relation to their predictive value for Phase III. Limitations on predictability may arise because of differences between Phase I and Phase III in both study population and study design. The study population in Phase I, in contrast with Phase III, is usually numerically small, male, young, of average size, healthy, asymptomatic and free from other medication. The Phase III population may be of different nationality or race. Phase I studies are always of short duration. Drug administration is usually in the morning and may be accompanied by more restrictions on diet, smoking and alcohol intake than in Phase III trials. The implications of these differences in study population and design are discussed. The predictive value of dose tolerance studies for Phase III can be substantial, provided that the results are interpreted sensibly. However, the tolerance studies should perhaps be regarded mainly as an essential preliminary to single and multiple dose kinetic, dynamic and interaction studies; the combined experience of these trials should have much greater predictive power for Phase III than dose tolerance studies alone.
简要描述了新药研发的I期、II期和III期。I期剂量耐受性研究的局限性与其对III期的预测价值相关。由于I期和III期在研究人群和研究设计方面存在差异,可能会出现预测性方面的局限性。与III期相比,I期的研究人群通常数量较少、为男性、年轻、体型中等、健康、无症状且未服用其他药物。III期人群可能来自不同国籍或种族。I期研究的持续时间总是很短。给药通常在上午,与III期试验相比,可能对饮食、吸烟和饮酒摄入有更多限制。讨论了研究人群和设计中这些差异的影响。只要合理解读结果,剂量耐受性研究对III期的预测价值可能很大。然而,耐受性研究或许应主要被视为单次和多次剂量动力学、动态学及相互作用研究的必要前奏;这些试验的综合经验对III期的预测能力应比单独的剂量耐受性研究强得多。