• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外冲击波疗法与手法治疗对颈源性头痛胸锁乳突肌激痛点的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验

Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and manual therapy on active trigger points of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in cervicogenic headache: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Xia Chunfeng, Zhao Yanjun, Lin Lizhen, Yu Yanni, Wang Jialiang, Fan Jiecheng, Yuan Xiangzhen, Zhang Shuyun

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China.

Department of Ultrasound, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Oct 31;71(1):56-65. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.13994. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.5606/tftrd.2024.13994
PMID:40270630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12012926/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and manual therapy (MT) on active trigger points of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) in patients with cervicogenic headache (CEH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 42 patients were included (27 females, 15 males; mean age: 33.2±7.7 years; range, 18 to 45 years) in the randomized controlled trial between March 2022 and December 2022. The patients were randomly divided into the ESWT group (n=21) and the MT group (n=21). Each group received therapy once a week for four weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and secondary outcome measures were pressure pain threshold (PPT), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and stiffness (shear elastic modulus) of the SCM measured at baseline, postintervention, and four weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

One patient from the ESWT group was lost to follow-up. The missing data were imputed for intention-to-treat analysis. Significant decreases of VAS, NDI, and shear elastic modulus of SCM were found at postintervention and four weeks after treatment in both groups (p<0.01). The PPT scores markedly increased over time compared to baseline in both groups (p<0.01). The repeated measures of analysis of variance revealed a significant time effect (p<0.001) in each outcome variable for both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in VAS, PPT, NDI, and the stiffness of SCM at each time point.

CONCLUSION

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy and MT were equally effective in pain relief, functional recovery, and reduction of muscle stiffness. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy may be used as an alternative treatment method for CEH patients with active myofascial trigger points of the SCM.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)和手法治疗(MT)对颈源性头痛(CEH)患者胸锁乳突肌(SCM)活性触发点的影响。

患者与方法

2022年3月至2022年12月期间,共有42例患者纳入随机对照试验(27例女性,15例男性;平均年龄:33.2±7.7岁;范围18至45岁)。患者被随机分为ESWT组(n = 21)和MT组(n = 21)。每组每周接受一次治疗,共四周。主要结局指标为视觉模拟量表(VAS),次要结局指标为压力疼痛阈值(PPT)、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)以及在基线、干预后和治疗后四周测量的SCM的僵硬度(剪切弹性模量)。

结果

ESWT组有1例患者失访。对缺失数据进行意向性分析插补。两组在干预后和治疗后四周时,VAS、NDI和SCM的剪切弹性模量均显著降低(p<0.01)。与基线相比,两组的PPT评分随时间均显著增加(p<0.01)。重复测量方差分析显示,两组各结局变量均有显著的时间效应(p<0.001)。两组在各时间点的VAS、PPT、NDI和SCM僵硬度方面均无显著差异。

结论

体外冲击波疗法和手法治疗在缓解疼痛、功能恢复和降低肌肉僵硬度方面同样有效。体外冲击波疗法可作为患有SCM活性肌筋膜触发点的CEH患者的替代治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dca/12012926/c9242153a462/TJPMR-2025-71-1-056-065-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dca/12012926/fdc94eecd8e6/TJPMR-2025-71-1-056-065-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dca/12012926/40483d99f09f/TJPMR-2025-71-1-056-065-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dca/12012926/b044ebad0dd8/TJPMR-2025-71-1-056-065-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dca/12012926/c9242153a462/TJPMR-2025-71-1-056-065-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dca/12012926/fdc94eecd8e6/TJPMR-2025-71-1-056-065-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dca/12012926/40483d99f09f/TJPMR-2025-71-1-056-065-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dca/12012926/b044ebad0dd8/TJPMR-2025-71-1-056-065-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dca/12012926/c9242153a462/TJPMR-2025-71-1-056-065-F4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and manual therapy on active trigger points of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in cervicogenic headache: A randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波疗法与手法治疗对颈源性头痛胸锁乳突肌激痛点的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Oct 31;71(1):56-65. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.13994. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Manual treatment for cervicogenic headache and active trigger point in the sternocleidomastoid muscle: a pilot randomized clinical trial.针对颈源性头痛和胸锁乳突肌活动性触发点的手法治疗:一项初步随机临床试验。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Sep;36(7):403-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.05.022. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
3
Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial.皮质类固醇注射与体外冲击波疗法治疗腰方肌下部激痛点的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Oct 19;21(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03714-3.
4
A sonographic comparison of the effect of dry needling and ischemic compression on the active trigger point of the sternocleidomastoid muscle associated with cervicogenic headache: A randomized trial.超声检查比较干针疗法与缺血性按压对与颈源性头痛相关的胸锁乳突肌激痛点的影响:一项随机试验。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020;33(5):749-759. doi: 10.3233/BMR-171077.
5
The effects of shock wave and dry needling on active trigger points of upper trapezius muscle in patients with non-specific neck pain: A randomized clinical trial.冲击波和干针疗法对非特异性颈部疼痛患者上斜方肌活性触发点的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(5):811-818. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181289.
6
Randomized Trial on Comparison of the Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Dry Needling in Myofascial Trigger Points.随机对照试验比较体外冲击波疗法与干针疗法治疗肌筋膜触发点的疗效。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;98(8):677-684. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001173.
7
Effect of ischemic compression for cervicogenic headache and elastic behavior of active trigger point in the sternocleidomastoid muscle using ultrasound imaging.超声成像观察缺血性按压对颈源性头痛的影响及胸锁乳突肌激痛点的弹性特征
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Oct;21(4):933-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
8
High-Energy Flux Density Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Traditional Physical Therapy Modalities in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized-controlled, Single-Blind Trial.高能通量密度体外冲击波疗法与传统物理治疗方式治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征的随机对照单盲试验
Arch Rheumatol. 2019 Jun 25;35(1):78-89. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2020.7496. eCollection 2020 Mar.
9
The Effectiveness of Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Dry Needling in Patients with Cervicogenic Headache.胸锁乳突肌干针疗法对颈源性头痛患者的疗效
Adv Biomed Res. 2021 Feb 26;10:10. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_138_20. eCollection 2021.
10
Effects of Repeated Injection of 1% Lidocaine vs. Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Treating Myofascial Trigger Points: A Randomized Controlled Trial.重复注射 1%利多卡因与桡动脉体外冲击波治疗肌筋膜触发点的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 26;58(4):479. doi: 10.3390/medicina58040479.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of manual and exercise therapy on headache intensity and frequency among patients with cervicogenic headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手法和运动疗法治疗颈源性头痛患者头痛强度和频率的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 Nov 23;30(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00459-9.
2
Effectiveness of manual therapy in the treatment of cervicogenic headache: A systematic review.手法治疗在颈源性头痛治疗中的有效性:一项系统评价。
Headache. 2022 Mar;62(3):271-283. doi: 10.1111/head.14278. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
3
Elasticity of neck muscles in cervicogenic headache.
颈源性头痛中颈部肌肉的弹性。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2022 Sep;166(3):328-333. doi: 10.5507/bp.2021.030. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus standard care in the treatment of neck and upper back myofascial pain: a single blinded randomised clinical trial.体外冲击波疗法与标准治疗在治疗颈部和上背部肌筋膜疼痛中的疗效比较:一项单盲随机临床试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2021 Jan;35(1):102-113. doi: 10.1177/0269215520947074. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
5
Spinal manipulation for the management of cervicogenic headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis.脊柱推拿治疗颈源性头痛的管理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Pain. 2020 Oct;24(9):1687-1702. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1632. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
6
Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Pain and Function in Myofascial Pain Syndrome of the Trapezius: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体外冲击波疗法治疗斜方肌肌筋膜疼痛综合征疼痛和功能的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Aug;101(8):1437-1446. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.02.013. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
7
The effect of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy on myofascial pain syndrome of trapezius: A systematic review and meta-analysis.聚焦体外冲击波疗法对斜方肌肌筋膜疼痛综合征的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(7):e19085. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019085.
8
A sonographic comparison of the effect of dry needling and ischemic compression on the active trigger point of the sternocleidomastoid muscle associated with cervicogenic headache: A randomized trial.超声检查比较干针疗法与缺血性按压对与颈源性头痛相关的胸锁乳突肌激痛点的影响:一项随机试验。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020;33(5):749-759. doi: 10.3233/BMR-171077.
9
Randomized Trial on Comparison of the Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Dry Needling in Myofascial Trigger Points.随机对照试验比较体外冲击波疗法与干针疗法治疗肌筋膜触发点的疗效。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;98(8):677-684. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001173.
10
Myofascial pain syndrome and trigger points: evaluation and treatment in patients with musculoskeletal pain.肌筋膜疼痛综合征和触发点:肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的评估和治疗。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2019 Sep;13(3):270-276. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000445.