Müller Jörg Michael, Elvert Christina
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 9;4:1528196. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2025.1528196. eCollection 2025.
In the context of parent-child interaction, the Emotional Availability Scales have been developed to capture a dyad's emotional connection in an observational setting by four parental and two child-related scales. This study aims to test the psychometric foundation of the EAS, including basic descriptive preconditions on the item level and structural validity on the scale level, for a preschool-aged sample; as such, it complements analyses by Aran for a sample of infants. The sample of parents and their preschool-aged children is a mixed clinically referred and non-clinical sample from a midsize city in Germany. Interactions were observed in a free-play setting and rated with the EAS by two blind and certificated raters. Several model tests indicate violations for the structural model as well as all six measurement models. An additional exploratory factor analysis with parallel analysis suggests a non-interpretable two-factor structure. Psychometric analyses did not validate the EAS's postulated structure and measurement model. A literature review showed that ceiling effects on the item and scale levels are not unique to our study. However, traditionally important concepts or terms of parent-child relationships covered by the EAS are not rejected by our study and can be assessed with alternative measures, but these also need psychometric evaluation in the future.
在亲子互动的背景下,情感可及性量表已被开发出来,通过四个与父母相关和两个与孩子相关的量表,在观察环境中捕捉二元组的情感联系。本研究旨在测试情感可及性量表(EAS)的心理测量基础,包括项目层面的基本描述性前提条件和量表层面的结构效度,针对学龄前儿童样本;因此,它补充了阿兰对婴儿样本的分析。父母及其学龄前儿童的样本是来自德国一个中等城市的临床转诊和非临床混合样本。在自由玩耍环境中观察互动,并由两名盲法认证评分者使用情感可及性量表进行评分。几个模型测试表明结构模型以及所有六个测量模型都存在违反情况。一项额外的平行分析探索性因素分析表明是一个无法解释的两因素结构。心理测量分析并未验证情感可及性量表假定的结构和测量模型。文献综述表明,项目和量表层面的天花板效应并非我们的研究独有。然而,情感可及性量表涵盖的传统上重要的亲子关系概念或术语并未被我们的研究否定,并且可以用替代测量方法进行评估,但这些未来也需要进行心理测量评估。