Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
School of Education, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS6 3QQ, UK.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2019 Jun;22(2):253-271. doi: 10.1007/s10567-019-00275-3.
This systematic review sought to identify observational measures of parent-child interactions commonly implemented in parenting program research, and to assess the level of psychometric evidence available for their use with this age group. Two separate searches of the same databases were conducted; firstly, to identify eligible instruments, and secondly to identify studies reporting on the psychometric properties of the identified measures. Five commercial platforms hosting 19 electronic databases were searched from their inception to conducted search dates. Fourteen measures were identified from Search 1; a systematic search of randomized controlled trial evaluations of parenting programs. For Search 2, inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied to 1327 retrieved papers that described the development and/or validation of the 14 measures identified in Search 1. Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria, resulting in five observational measures for the final review. Data were extracted and synthesized using the COSMIN rating system to describe the methodological quality of each article alongside the overall quality rating of the psychometric property reported for each measure using the Terwee checklist. Measure reliability was categorized into four domains (internal consistency, test-re-test, inter-rater, and intra-rater). Measure validity was categorized into four domains (content, structural, convergent/divergent, and discriminant). Results indicated that the majority of psychometric evidence related to children aged from birth the three with internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and structural validity the most commonly reported properties, although this evidence was often weak. The findings suggest further validation of the included measures is required to establish acceptability for the whole target age group.
本系统评价旨在确定在育儿计划研究中常用的观察性亲子互动测量方法，并评估这些方法在该年龄段使用的心理测量证据水平。对相同的数据库进行了两次独立搜索；首先，识别合格的工具，其次，识别报告确定措施心理测量特性的研究。从成立之日起至进行搜索之日，在五个商业平台上搜索了 19 个电子数据库。从搜索 1 中确定了 14 项措施；这是对育儿计划的随机对照试验评估的系统搜索。对于搜索 2，将纳入/排除标准应用于描述搜索 1 中确定的 14 项措施的开发和/或验证的 1327 篇检索论文。有 17 篇文章符合纳入标准，最终审查结果为 5 项观察性措施。使用 COSMIN 评分系统提取和综合数据，以描述每篇文章的方法学质量，并使用 Terwee 清单报告每个措施的心理测量特性的整体质量评级。衡量可靠性分为四个领域（内部一致性、测试重测、评分者间和评分者内）。衡量有效性分为四个领域（内容、结构、收敛/发散和判别）。结果表明，大多数与从出生到三岁的儿童相关的心理测量证据与内部一致性、评分者间可靠性和结构有效性有关，这些是最常报告的特性，尽管这些证据往往较弱。研究结果表明，需要进一步验证所包括的措施，以确定整个目标年龄组的可接受性。
