Thomas Emily J, Taylor William J, Siegert Richard J, Levack William M
Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Hampshire and Isle of Wight NHS Foundation Trust, Calmore, UK.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2025 Jun;61(3):472-481. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08721-0. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
There is growing awareness that traumatic brain injury (TBI) can have a significant and troublesome impact of a person's self-identity, yet few measurement tools exist to clinically evaluate this.
The aim of this paper was to develop a patient-reported measure of strength of self-identity after TBI - the Brain Injury Sense of Self Scale (BISOSS).
Measurement development and validation.
UK and New Zealand communities.
One hundred and thirty-six people with TBI (68.4% [93/136]) male; mean age 47.9 years, SD 13.0 years; mean time post-TBI 11.2 years, SD 11.1 years; 74.3% (101/136) moderate to severe TBI).
Preliminary measurement items were generated from prior qualitative research, a concept analysis, and cognitive interviewing with survivors of TBI. Administration of the draft BISOSS, the Glasgow Outcome Scale, and the Sense of Coherence Scale to participants - with factor analysis, Rasch analysis, and construct validity testing to refine and test the draft BISOSS.
After iterative refinements using the Rasch model to help guide item adjustments, BISOSS was comprised of three subscales (egocentric self, sociocentric self, and relational self), each which fit the Rasch model and demonstrated unidimensionality, adequate precision, absence of differential item functioning and adequate person separation index. BISOSS scores correlated well with employment status, leisure activities and positive family relationships. Participants' responses supported the notion that problems with self-identity were commonplace after TBI, with 40% of respondents self-reporting such problems.
BISOSS is a valid measure, which conforms to measurement expectations for an interval scale and is in grounded in the language of people with TBI. It is now available as a validated tool for assessing self-identity issues post-TBI. Further work is required to assess whether the scale can change over time or is responsive to interventions targeted at strengthening self-identity.
Change in self-identity is a commonplace problem following TBI but is seldomly evaluated in clinical practice. BISOSS can be used to explore patient experiences of problems with self-identity after TBI and will help further our understanding of this phenomenon.
人们越来越意识到创伤性脑损伤(TBI)会对一个人的自我认同产生重大且棘手的影响,但临床上几乎没有测量工具来评估这一点。
本文的目的是开发一种患者报告的TBI后自我认同强度测量工具——脑损伤自我感知量表(BISOSS)。
测量工具的开发与验证。
英国和新西兰社区。
136名TBI患者(男性占68.4%[93/136];平均年龄47.9岁,标准差13.0岁;TBI后平均时间11.2年,标准差11.1年;74.3%[101/136]为中度至重度TBI)。
根据先前的定性研究、概念分析以及对TBI幸存者的认知访谈生成初步测量项目。向参与者发放BISOSS初稿、格拉斯哥预后量表和连贯感量表,并进行因素分析、拉施分析和结构效度测试,以完善和检验BISOSS初稿。
在使用拉施模型指导项目调整进行反复完善后,BISOSS由三个子量表组成(以自我为中心的自我、以社会为中心的自我和关系自我),每个子量表都符合拉施模型,表现出单维度性、足够的精度、无项目功能差异以及足够的人员区分指数。BISOSS得分与就业状况、休闲活动和积极的家庭关系密切相关。参与者的回答支持了TBI后自我认同问题很常见的观点,40%的受访者自我报告存在此类问题。
BISOSS是一种有效的测量工具,符合区间量表的测量期望,且以TBI患者的语言为基础。它现在是一种经过验证的评估TBI后自我认同问题的工具。需要进一步开展工作来评估该量表是否会随时间变化,或者是否对旨在强化自我认同的干预措施有反应。
自我认同的改变是TBI后常见的问题,但在临床实践中很少被评估。BISOSS可用于探索TBI后患者自我认同问题的经历,并将有助于加深我们对这一现象的理解。