• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

C反应蛋白与淋巴细胞比值联合临床特征构建消化性溃疡所致上消化道出血的预测模型。

C-reactive protein to lymphocyte ratio combined with clinical features to construct a predictive model for upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to peptic ulcer.

作者信息

Song Hong, Yang Juan, Li Jiao, Deng Cui, Zhang SiMin, Zheng Sheng

机构信息

Department of Gerontology, Taiyuan Central Hospital, Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 Apr 23;80:100644. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100644. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100644
PMID:40273489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12051625/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This research aimed to determine the feasibility and accuracy of CLR and clinical features to formulate a prediction model for Peptic Ulcer (PU)-induced Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding (UGIB).

METHODS

The clinical data of 146 PU patients were prospectively collected, and patients were divided into the UGIB group (n = 48) and the non-UGIB group (n = 98). The factors affecting UGIB were analyzed using multifactorial logistic regression and collinearity analysis. The prediction model of UGIB was constructed, the predictive value of which was analyzed using the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) and Area Under the Curve (AUC), while the accuracy was analyzed using the calibration curve and Hosmer Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests, and the application value was assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Statistical significance was observed between the two groups regarding HP infection, ulcer diameter, ulcer stage, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Neutrophil, LYM, NEUT/LYM Ratio (NLR), CRP, and CLR. HP infection, ulcer stage, use of NSAIDs, NLR, and CLR were independent risk factors for UGIB, and PCT was a non-independent risk factor. The AUC for this model was 0.921. The calibration curve of the model matched the actual curve. The model achieved a better fitting effect in predicting UGIB (χ = 8.5069, df = 8, p = 0.3856) and had a better clinical application value.

CONCLUSION

A predictive model for PU-induced UGIB, based on CLR and clinical features, can assist in developing clinical treatment plans to prevent UGIB.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定C反应蛋白(CLR)和临床特征用于制定消化性溃疡(PU)所致上消化道出血(UGIB)预测模型的可行性和准确性。

方法

前瞻性收集146例PU患者的临床资料,将患者分为UGIB组(n = 48)和非UGIB组(n = 98)。采用多因素logistic回归和共线性分析来分析影响UGIB的因素。构建UGIB的预测模型,使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)分析其预测价值,同时使用校准曲线和Hosmer Lemeshow拟合优度检验分析准确性,并使用决策曲线分析(DCA)评估应用价值。

结果

两组在幽门螺杆菌(HP)感染、溃疡直径、溃疡分期、非甾体抗炎药的使用、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)和CLR方面存在统计学差异。HP感染、溃疡分期、非甾体抗炎药的使用、NLR和CLR是UGIB的独立危险因素,而降钙素原(PCT)是一个非独立危险因素。该模型的AUC为0.921。模型的校准曲线与实际曲线匹配。该模型在预测UGIB方面具有较好的拟合效果(χ = 8.5069,自由度 = 8,p = 0.3856),并且具有较好的临床应用价值。

结论

基于CLR和临床特征的PU所致UGIB预测模型可有助于制定临床治疗方案以预防UGIB。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f19f/12051625/907058491eaa/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f19f/12051625/5646afd1d649/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f19f/12051625/467faf903078/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f19f/12051625/09fa4a2e11cb/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f19f/12051625/907058491eaa/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f19f/12051625/5646afd1d649/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f19f/12051625/467faf903078/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f19f/12051625/09fa4a2e11cb/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f19f/12051625/907058491eaa/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
C-reactive protein to lymphocyte ratio combined with clinical features to construct a predictive model for upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to peptic ulcer.C反应蛋白与淋巴细胞比值联合临床特征构建消化性溃疡所致上消化道出血的预测模型。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 Apr 23;80:100644. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100644. eCollection 2025.
2
[Clinical epidemiological characteristics and change trend of upper gastrointestinal bleeding over the past 15 years].[过去15年上消化道出血的临床流行病学特征及变化趋势]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 25;20(4):425-431.
3
Development and evaluation of a predictive model of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in liver cirrhosis.肝硬化患者上消化道出血预测模型的开发与评估
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03677-6.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-ulcer and Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Risk Prediction Using a Scoring System.非溃疡性和非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者的临床结局:使用评分系统进行风险预测的前瞻性多中心研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Dec;63(12):3253-3261. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5255-5. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
5
Helicobacter pylori and bleeding duodenal ulcer: prevalence of the infection and role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.幽门螺杆菌与十二指肠溃疡出血:感染率及非甾体抗炎药的作用
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jul;36(7):717-24. doi: 10.1080/003655201300191978.
6
Predictors of variceal or nonvariceal source of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. An etiology predictive score established and validated in a tertiary referral center.预测上消化道出血的静脉曲张或非静脉曲张来源。在三级转诊中心建立和验证的病因预测评分。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2013 Dec;22(4):379-84.
7
Diagnostic Values of Blood Count Values and Ratios in Distinguishing between Peptic Ulcer Bleeding and Esophagogastric Variceal Bleeding.血常规数值和比值在鉴别消化性溃疡出血与食管胃静脉曲张出血中的诊断价值。
Clin Lab. 2020 Apr 1;66(4). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.190927.
8
Risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding associated with selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, traditional non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin and combinations.与选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂、传统非阿司匹林非甾体抗炎药、阿司匹林及其联合用药相关的上消化道溃疡出血风险
Gut. 2006 Dec;55(12):1731-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.080754. Epub 2006 May 10.
9
[Risk factors associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and with mortality].[与上消化道出血及死亡率相关的危险因素]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2009 Mar-Apr;47(2):179-84.
10
Risk factors for mortality among patients admitted with upper gastrointestinal bleeding at a tertiary hospital: a prospective cohort study.一家三级医院收治的上消化道出血患者的死亡危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec 20;17(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0712-8.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of C-Reactive Protein/Lymphocyte Ratio (CLR) on PFS in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with CDK4/6 Inhibitors: A Novel Biomarker.C反应蛋白/淋巴细胞比值(CLR)对接受CDK4/6抑制剂治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者无进展生存期的影响:一种新型生物标志物
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2024 Jul 3;16:329-339. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S464161. eCollection 2024.
2
C-reactive protein/lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in acute pancreatitis: a cross-sectional study assessing disease severity.C 反应蛋白/淋巴细胞比值作为急性胰腺炎的预后生物标志物:一项评估疾病严重程度的横断面研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Jun 1;110(6):3223-3229. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001273.
3
Analysis of risk factors for ulcer recurrence and upper gastrointestinal bleeding in children with peptic ulcer treated with eradication therapy.
根除治疗的消化性溃疡患儿溃疡复发及上消化道出血危险因素分析
Transl Pediatr. 2023 Apr 29;12(4):618-630. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-155. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
4
Evaluation of individual and combined NLR, LMR and CLR ratio for prognosis disease severity and outcomes in patients with COVID-19.评估 NLR、LMR 和 CLR 比值对 COVID-19 患者疾病严重程度和结局的个体和联合预测价值。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2022 Aug;109:108781. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108781. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
5
Serum gastrin-17 concentration for prediction of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding risk among peptic ulcer patients.血清胃泌素-17浓度用于预测消化性溃疡患者上消化道出血风险
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Dec 16;9(35):10948-10955. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i35.10948.
6
The role of toll-like receptors in peptic ulcer disease.Toll 样受体在消化性溃疡病中的作用。
Immunol Med. 2022 Jun;45(2):69-78. doi: 10.1080/25785826.2021.1963190. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
7
Role of NLR, PLR, ELR and CLR in differentiating COVID-19 patients with and without pneumonia.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值、嗜中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和嗜酸性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在鉴别新冠肺炎患者是否合并肺炎中的作用。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14781. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14781. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
8
Pharmacological Management of Peptic Ulcer: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine.《西塞尔内科学》中关于消化性溃疡的药物治疗:一个世纪的专家观点。
Am J Ther. 2021 Aug 17;28(5):e552-e559. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001439.
9
Prognostic role and clinical significance of C-reactive protein-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer.C 反应蛋白-淋巴细胞比值在结直肠癌中的预后作用及临床意义。
Bioengineered. 2021 Dec;12(1):5138-5148. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1960768.
10
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2020.2020 年消化性溃疡病循证临床实践指南。
J Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr;56(4):303-322. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01769-0. Epub 2021 Feb 23.