• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有部分重叠变量的时间序列数据集的因果推断。

Causal inference for time series datasets with partially overlapping variables.

作者信息

Gomez Louis Adedapo, Claassen Jan, Kleinberg Samantha

机构信息

Stevens Institute of Technology, 1 Castle Point Terrace, Hoboken, 07030, NJ, USA.

Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York, 10032, NY, USA; New York Presbyterian Hospital, Praveen Hospital Lane, New York, 10032, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2025 Jun;166:104828. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104828. Epub 2025 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104828
PMID:40274036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12103268/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Healthcare data provides a unique opportunity to learn causal relationships but the largest datasets, such as from hospitals or intensive care units, are often observational and do not standardize variables collected for all patients. Rather, the variables depend on a patient's health status, treatment plan, and differences between providers. This poses major challenges for causal inference, which either must restrict analysis to patients with complete data (reducing power) or learn patient-specific models (making it difficult to generalize). While missing variables can lead to confounding, variables absent for one individual are often measured in another.

METHODS

We propose a novel method, called Causal Model Combination for Time Series (CMC-TS), to learn causal relationships from time series with partially overlapping variable sets. CMC-TS overcomes errors by specifically leveraging partial overlap between datasets (e.g., patients) to iteratively reconstruct missing variables and correct errors by reweighting inferences using shared information across datasets. We evaluated CMC-TS and compared it to the state of the art on both simulated data and real-world data from stroke patients admitted to a neurological intensive care unit.

RESULTS

On simulated data, CMC-TS had the fewest false discoveries and highest F1-score compared to baselines. On real data from stroke patients in a neurological intensive care unit, we found fewer implausible and more highly ranked plausible causes of a clinically important adverse event.

CONCLUSION

Our approach may lead to better use of observational healthcare data for causal inference, by enabling causal inference from patient data with partially overlapping variable sets.

摘要

目的

医疗保健数据为了解因果关系提供了独特的机会,但最大的数据集,如来自医院或重症监护病房的数据,往往是观察性的,并且没有对为所有患者收集的变量进行标准化。相反,这些变量取决于患者的健康状况、治疗计划以及提供者之间的差异。这给因果推断带来了重大挑战,因果推断要么必须将分析限制在具有完整数据的患者身上(降低效能),要么学习特定患者的模型(难以进行概括)。虽然缺失变量会导致混杂,但一个个体缺失的变量通常在另一个个体中有所测量。

方法

我们提出了一种名为时间序列因果模型组合(CMC - TS)的新方法,用于从具有部分重叠变量集的时间序列中学习因果关系。CMC - TS通过专门利用数据集(例如患者)之间的部分重叠来迭代重建缺失变量,并通过使用跨数据集的共享信息对推断进行重新加权来纠正错误,从而克服误差。我们对CMC - TS进行了评估,并将其与来自神经重症监护病房的中风患者的模拟数据和真实世界数据的现有最佳方法进行了比较。

结果

在模拟数据上,与基线相比,CMC - TS的错误发现最少,F1分数最高。在神经重症监护病房中风患者的真实数据上,我们发现临床上重要不良事件的不合理原因更少,合理原因的排名更高。

结论

我们的方法可能通过允许从具有部分重叠变量集的患者数据进行因果推断,从而更好地利用观察性医疗保健数据进行因果推断。

相似文献

1
Causal inference for time series datasets with partially overlapping variables.具有部分重叠变量的时间序列数据集的因果推断。
J Biomed Inform. 2025 Jun;166:104828. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104828. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
2
Using Domain Knowledge to Overcome Latent Variables in Causal Inference from Time Series.利用领域知识克服时间序列因果推断中的潜在变量
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2019 Aug;106:474-489.
3
An algorithm for direct causal learning of influences on patient outcomes.一种用于直接因果学习对患者预后影响的算法。
Artif Intell Med. 2017 Jan;75:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
4
Causal evidence in health decision making: methodological approaches of causal inference and health decision science.健康决策中的因果证据:因果推断方法和健康决策科学。
Ger Med Sci. 2022 Dec 21;20:Doc12. doi: 10.3205/000314. eCollection 2022.
5
Causal Inference With Observational Data and Unobserved Confounding Variables.利用观测数据和未观测到的混杂变量进行因果推断。
Ecol Lett. 2025 Jan;28(1):e70023. doi: 10.1111/ele.70023.
6
Causal discovery from medical textual data.从医学文本数据中进行因果关系发现。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:542-6.
7
Methods to Enhance Causal Inference for Assessing Impact of Clinical Informatics Platform Implementation.增强因果推断以评估临床信息学平台实施效果的方法
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 Feb;16(2):e009277. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009277. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
8
Causal inference for observational longitudinal studies using deep survival models.使用深度生存模型对观察性纵向研究进行因果推断。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Jul;131:104119. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104119. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
9
CauRuler: Causal irredundant association rule miner for complex patient trajectory modelling.CauRuler:用于复杂患者轨迹建模的因果非冗余关联规则挖掘器。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 Mar;155:106636. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106636. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
10
Automated Identification of Causal Moderators in Time-Series Data.时间序列数据中因果调节因素的自动识别
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2018 Aug;92:4-22.

本文引用的文献

1
Definitions, components and processes of data harmonisation in healthcare: a scoping review.医疗保健数据协调的定义、组成部分和流程:范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Sep 14;20(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01218-7.
2
Using Domain Knowledge to Overcome Latent Variables in Causal Inference from Time Series.利用领域知识克服时间序列因果推断中的潜在变量
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2019 Aug;106:474-489.
3
Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets.检测和量化大型非线性时间序列数据集的因果关系。
Sci Adv. 2019 Nov 27;5(11):eaau4996. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4996. eCollection 2019 Nov.
4
Causal Structure of Brain Physiology after Brain Injury from Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.蛛网膜下腔出血所致脑损伤后脑生理学的因果结构
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0149878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149878. eCollection 2016.
5
The International Multi-disciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring: future directions and emerging technologies.多模态监测国际多学科共识会议:未来方向与新兴技术
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21 Suppl 2:S270-81. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0049-x.
6
Cerebral autoregulation in stroke: a review of transcranial Doppler studies.脑卒中患者的脑自动调节:经颅多普勒研究综述。
Stroke. 2010 Nov;41(11):2697-704. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.594168. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
7
Spontaneous hyperventilation and brain tissue hypoxia in patients with severe brain injury.严重脑损伤患者的自发性过度通气和脑组织缺氧。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;81(7):793-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.174425. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
8
Data standards in clinical research: gaps, overlaps, challenges and future directions.临床研究中的数据标准:差距、重叠、挑战与未来方向。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):687-96. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2470. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
9
Cerebral perfusion pressure and risk of brain hypoxia in severe head injury: a prospective observational study.严重颅脑损伤中脑灌注压与脑缺氧风险:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R670-6. doi: 10.1186/cc3822. Epub 2005 Oct 14.
10
Skin blood flow in adult human thermoregulation: how it works, when it does not, and why.成年人体温调节中的皮肤血流:其工作原理、失效情况及原因。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2003 May;78(5):603-12. doi: 10.4065/78.5.603.