Fortnum Kathryn, Weber Meyene Duque, Dudley Dean, Tudella Eloisa, Kwan Matthew, Richard Veronique, Cairney John
The University of Queensland, Health and Wellbeing Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Department of Physiotherapy, The Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
Sports Med Open. 2025 Apr 25;11(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00827-8.
Physical literacy has received increased research attention over the last decade focusing on the unification of the definition, measurement, and application, including in school and health-based contexts. In 2019, Cairney et al. released a model positioning physical literacy holistically as a primary determinant of health and disease, mediated by physical activity (PA), the physiological and psychological adaptations associated with PA, and the individual and social/environmental/contextual factors or conditions that impact PA-related behaviour, which had a significant impact on physical literacy-related literature. To assess the impact of the model on the extant literature, and better understand the relationship between physical literacy, PA and health as proposed by Cairney et al., we conducted a citation content analysis and narrative review. 956 citations were identified citing the model proposed by Cairney et al. Of these, 16 used the model to construct a theoretical framework and were included in the extended analysis. Thirteen studies were observational, and participants were all children or young people with a total age range 4-20 years. Results demonstrate that physical literacy is related to health-related fitness variables including aerobic fitness, body composition, flexibility, and muscular strength and power; total PA and MVPA; and health literacy, and wellbeing, supporting the model proposed by Cairney et al. However, gaps remain in understanding critical components of the model (e.g., the proposed mediation pathways), and in clarifying the nature of the relationships in a variety of populations (e.g., clinical populations) and across the lifespan. A pragmatic approach to addressing these gaps is recommended.
在过去十年中,身体素养受到了越来越多的研究关注,重点在于其定义、测量和应用的统一,包括在学校和基于健康的环境中的应用。2019年,凯恩斯等人发布了一个模型,将身体素养整体定位为健康和疾病的主要决定因素,由身体活动(PA)、与PA相关的生理和心理适应,以及影响PA相关行为的个体和社会/环境/背景因素或条件介导,这对与身体素养相关的文献产生了重大影响。为了评估该模型对现有文献的影响,并更好地理解凯恩斯等人提出的身体素养、PA和健康之间的关系,我们进行了引文内容分析和叙述性综述。共识别出956条引用凯恩斯等人提出的模型的文献。其中,16篇使用该模型构建了理论框架,并被纳入扩展分析。13项研究为观察性研究,参与者均为儿童或青少年,年龄范围为4至20岁。结果表明,身体素养与包括有氧适能、身体成分、柔韧性以及肌肉力量和功率在内的与健康相关的体适能变量、总PA和中等强度身体活动(MVPA)以及健康素养和幸福感相关,支持了凯恩斯等人提出的模型。然而,在理解该模型的关键组成部分(例如,所提出的中介途径)以及阐明不同人群(例如,临床人群)和整个生命周期内关系的性质方面仍存在差距。建议采用务实的方法来解决这些差距。
Sports Med Open. 2025-4-25
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-7-25
Children (Basel). 2025-7-31
Front Psychol. 2023-3-17
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2023-8
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-12-8
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-11-17