Zhang Anna Yan, Wong Gloria Hoi Yan, Lum Terry Yat Sang, Woods Bob, Spector Aimee
Department of Social Work and Social Administration The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.
School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences University of Reading Reading UK.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Apr 24;11(2):e70075. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70075. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
Clinical guidelines recommend personalized activities and group cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) for promoting cognition, independence, and well-being in persons with dementia. Constructive engagement (CE), the state of being occupied positively in purposeful activities, is theoretically an essential process in personalized activities and CST. However, whether CE develops over time and what contributes to it are unknown. We investigated changes in CE during CST and its contributors.
This is a mixed-methods study. We used time sampling to record the time proportion of persons with dementia ( = 113) spent in constructive, passive, non-task-related engagement and non-engagement during early, middle, and late phases in a 14-session group CST. We tested changes in time proportion between phases using repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA). We analyzed qualitative interviews of CST facilitators ( = 12) thematically to explore contributors to CE.
Persons with dementia spent 51% and 46% of their time in constructive and passive engagement, respectively. Time of engagement in non-task-related activities and non-engagement was minimal. CE remained stable at around 50% of activity time throughout the intervention course, except for a slight increase from the early to middle phase (48% to 55%, F (2224) = 3.779, < 0.05). Age (= -0.26, < 0.01), cognitive function (= -0.29, < 0.01), and activities of daily living (= 0.20, < 0.05) at baseline were significantly correlated with CE, but gender and education were not. Contributors to CE include (1) tailoring activities, (2) using group dynamics, and (3) promoting positive experiences.
Group CST engages persons with dementia well, regardless of their differences in gender and literacy levels. CE remained relatively stable during CST, and younger, more physically and cognitively able people showed slightly greater CE. In group-based interventions, facilitators' skills and techniques could enhance CE. Future studies may focus on how CE as a plausible change mechanism further improves the intervention outcomes of persons with dementia.
Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is a non-pharmacological intervention that involves group-based activities and exercises to improve cognition and quality of life for persons with dementia, but the specific mechanisms behind it are not yet fully understood.This study is the first to investigate constructive engagement (CE), which describes active involvement in meaningful activities or complex interventions, specifically CST, for persons with dementia.CST engages them well, regardless of gender and literacy differences. CE time increases at the early intervention phase and stabilizes later on. CE occupies around half of the intervention time throughout CST, which can still be further increased by activity design and facilitators' skills.
临床指南推荐个性化活动和小组认知刺激疗法(CST),以促进痴呆症患者的认知、独立性和幸福感。建设性参与(CE),即在有目的的活动中积极投入的状态,从理论上讲是个性化活动和CST中的一个重要过程。然而,CE是否会随着时间发展以及促成其发展的因素尚不清楚。我们调查了CST期间CE的变化及其影响因素。
这是一项混合方法研究。我们使用时间抽样来记录113名痴呆症患者在为期14节的小组CST的早期、中期和后期阶段,花费在建设性、被动、非任务相关参与和不参与上的时间比例。我们使用重复方差分析(ANOVA)测试各阶段之间时间比例的变化。我们对CST促进者(n = 12)的定性访谈进行了主题分析,以探索CE的影响因素。
痴呆症患者分别将51%和46%的时间用于建设性和被动参与。参与非任务相关活动和不参与的时间很少。在整个干预过程中,CE在活动时间的50%左右保持稳定,除了从早期到中期略有增加(48%至55%,F(2,224)=3.779,P<0.05)。基线时的年龄(β = -0.26,P<0.01)、认知功能(β = -0.29,P<0.01)和日常生活活动能力(β = 0.20,P<0.05)与CE显著相关,但性别和教育程度无关。CE的影响因素包括:(1)活动定制;(2)利用小组动力;(3)促进积极体验。
小组CST能很好地让痴呆症患者参与其中,无论他们在性别和识字水平上存在何种差异。在CST期间,CE保持相对稳定,年龄较小、身体和认知能力较强的人表现出略高的CE。在基于小组的干预中,促进者的技能和技巧可以增强CE。未来的研究可能会关注CE作为一种合理的变化机制如何进一步改善痴呆症患者的干预效果。
认知刺激疗法(CST)是一种非药物干预,包括基于小组的活动和练习,以改善痴呆症患者的认知和生活质量,但其背后的具体机制尚未完全了解。本研究首次调查了建设性参与(CE),它描述了痴呆症患者积极参与有意义的活动或复杂干预,特别是CST。CST能很好地让他们参与其中,无论性别和识字差异如何。CE时间在干预早期增加,随后稳定。在整个CST过程中,CE占干预时间的一半左右,通过活动设计和促进者的技能仍可进一步提高。