• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用窄直径种植体进行单颗上颌中切牙种植修复的功能和美学效果的回顾性研究。

Retrospective Study of Functional and Esthetic Outcomes Using Narrow-Diameter Implants for Single Upper Central Incisor Replacements.

作者信息

Anitua Eduardo, Tarazona Aitana, Alkhraisat Mohammad Hamdan

机构信息

University Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Oral Implantology-UIRMI (UPV/EHU-Fundación Eduardo Anitua), 01007 Vitoria, Spain.

BTI Biotechnology Institute, 01005 Vitoria, Spain.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;13(4):144. doi: 10.3390/dj13040144.

DOI:10.3390/dj13040144
PMID:40277474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12025755/
Abstract

The upper central incisors play a central role in esthetics, symmetry, and function. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) for replacing single missing upper central incisors, addressing the gap in research regarding specific tooth types and their esthetic outcomes. This retrospective study included adult patients with a single missing upper central incisor replaced by NDIs. Exclusion criteria included patients who lost adjacent teeth during follow-up and patients with non-loaded implants. The primary outcome was peri-implant bone stability, while secondary outcomes included implant survival, technical complications, patient satisfaction, and esthetic evaluation using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and the White Esthetic Score (WES). Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. A total of 64 NDIs were placed in 64 patients (mean age 55 ± 15 years; 40 females, 24 males). Implant diameters were 3.3 and 3.5 mm, with lengths ranging from 6.5 to 11.0 mm. The mean follow-up period was 42 ± 19 months. Marginal bone loss was -0.7 ± 0.9 mm mesially and -0.5 ± 0.7 mm distally. No implant failures were recorded. Esthetic outcomes were satisfactory, with a mean PES of 7.0 ± 2.6 and a mean WES of 7.9 ± 2.0. NDIs demonstrated high survival rates, marginal bone stability, and acceptable esthetic outcomes in the replacement of single upper central incisors.

摘要

上颌中切牙在美观、对称和功能方面起着核心作用。本研究的目的是评估窄直径种植体(NDIs)用于替换单个缺失的上颌中切牙的效果,以填补关于特定牙齿类型及其美学效果研究的空白。这项回顾性研究纳入了用NDIs替换单个缺失上颌中切牙的成年患者。排除标准包括随访期间失去相邻牙齿的患者和种植体未负重的患者。主要观察指标是种植体周围骨稳定性,次要观察指标包括种植体存活率、技术并发症、患者满意度以及使用粉色美学评分(PES)和白色美学评分(WES)进行的美学评价。进行了描述性统计分析。共有64颗NDIs植入64例患者(平均年龄55±15岁;女性40例,男性24例)。种植体直径为3.3和3.5毫米,长度范围为6.5至11.0毫米。平均随访期为42±19个月。近中边缘骨吸收为-0.7±0.9毫米,远中为-0.5±0.7毫米。未记录到种植体失败情况。美学效果令人满意,平均PES为7.0±2.6,平均WES为7.9±2.0。在替换单个上颌中切牙时,NDIs显示出高存活率、边缘骨稳定性和可接受的美学效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196f/12025755/b8cdeb43b16c/dentistry-13-00144-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196f/12025755/f96f834069b9/dentistry-13-00144-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196f/12025755/2a657357a87c/dentistry-13-00144-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196f/12025755/b8cdeb43b16c/dentistry-13-00144-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196f/12025755/f96f834069b9/dentistry-13-00144-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196f/12025755/2a657357a87c/dentistry-13-00144-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/196f/12025755/b8cdeb43b16c/dentistry-13-00144-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Retrospective Study of Functional and Esthetic Outcomes Using Narrow-Diameter Implants for Single Upper Central Incisor Replacements.使用窄直径种植体进行单颗上颌中切牙种植修复的功能和美学效果的回顾性研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;13(4):144. doi: 10.3390/dj13040144.
2
Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores.使用客观美学标准对早期植入的上颌前牙单颗种植体进行疗效评估:一项横断面回顾性研究,对45例患者进行了2至4年的随访,并采用了粉红美学评分和白色美学评分。
J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):140-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435.
3
Prospective cohort study to evaluate narrow diameter implants for the restoration of a missing maxillary lateral incisor in patients with a cleft palate: Five-year results.评估窄直径种植体修复腭裂患者上颌侧切牙缺失的前瞻性队列研究:五年结果
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Sep 21. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.048.
4
Esthetic evaluation of implants placed after orthodontic treatment in patients with congenitally missing lateral incisors.先天性侧切牙缺失患者正畸治疗后植入种植体的美学评价
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;26(1):61-71. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12081. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
5
Immediate provisionalization in the esthetic zone: 1-year interim results from a prospective single-cohort multicenter study evaluating 3.0-mm-diameter tapered implants.即刻临时修复在美学区域:一项前瞻性单队列多中心研究的 1 年中期结果,评估了 3.0 毫米直径的锥形种植体。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jul;22(6):2299-2308. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2329-2. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
6
Evaluation of the influence of implant placement timing on the esthetic outcomes of single tooth implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: A retrospective study.评价种植体植入时机对上颌前牙单牙种植治疗美学效果的影响:一项回顾性研究。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Jul;30(4):338-345. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12385. Epub 2018 May 15.
7
Patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements performed by dental students: a retrospective evaluation 8 to 12 years after treatment.牙科学生进行的种植体支持的单颗牙修复的患者满意度和美学效果:治疗后8至12年的回顾性评估
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Winter;6(4):387-95.
8
A Comparison of Esthetic Features of Pre-existing Natural Tooth Versus Post-Implant Restoration in the Esthetic Zone: A Retrospective 12-month Follow-up.美学区域中天然牙与种植修复后美学特征的比较:一项为期12个月的回顾性随访研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):919-928. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6465.
9
Dental implant treatment for two adjacent missing teeth in the esthetic region: A systematic review and 10-year results of a prospective comparative pilot study.美学区两颗相邻缺失牙的牙种植治疗:一项前瞻性比较性初步研究的系统评价及 10 年结果。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Dec;9(6):954-968. doi: 10.1002/cre2.773. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
10
Stability of contour augmentation and esthetic outcomes of implant-supported single crowns in the esthetic zone: 3-year results of a prospective study with early implant placement postextraction.种植体支持的单冠在美学区的轮廓增强的稳定性和美学效果:即刻种植后 3 年前瞻性研究的结果。
J Periodontol. 2011 Mar;82(3):342-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100408. Epub 2010 Sep 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Factors on Dental Implant Fractures: A Systematic Review.牙种植体骨折的临床因素:一项系统评价。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;12(7):200. doi: 10.3390/dj12070200.
2
Validation of the pink esthetic score/white esthetic score at single tooth-supported prostheses in the esthetic zone: A randomized clinical trial.在美学区域中单颗牙支持修复体中验证粉色美学评分/白色美学评分:一项随机临床试验。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Jul;36(7):976-984. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13243. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
3
Clinical outcomes of narrow- and regular-diameter implants with bone augmentation in the anterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
在前上颌骨中使用骨增量的窄径和常规直径种植体的临床结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 6;28(3):196. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05588-4.
4
Less marginal bone loss around bone-level implants restored with long abutments: A systematic review and meta-analysis.长基台修复的骨水平种植体周围边缘骨丢失较少:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Periodontol 2000. 2024 Feb;94(1):627-638. doi: 10.1111/prd.12534. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
5
Influence of buccal bone wall thickness on the peri-implant hard and soft tissue dimensional changes: A systematic review.颊侧骨壁厚度对种植体周围软硬组织三维变化的影响:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Sep;34 Suppl 26:8-27. doi: 10.1111/clr.14177.
6
Achieving optimal implant esthetics using a team approach Part 1 a review of evidence-based criteria in implant treatment.采用团队协作方法实现最佳种植体美学效果 第1部分 种植治疗中基于证据的标准综述
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Nov;130(5):661-662. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.020. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
7
Clinical outcomes of titanium-zirconium alloy narrow-diameter implants for single-crown restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.钛锆合金窄径种植体单冠修复的临床效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jul;61(6):403-410. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 16.
8
Minimally Invasive Treatment of Lateral Incisors with Guided One-Piece or Two-Piece Titanium-Made Narrow Diameter Implants: A Retrospective Comparative Study with Up to Two Years Follow-Up.使用一体式或分体式钛制窄直径种植体对侧切牙进行微创治疗:一项长达两年随访的回顾性对比研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 May 27;12(11):3711. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113711.
9
Complications and treatment errors in implant positioning in the aesthetic zone: Diagnosis and possible solutions.美学区域种植体植入的并发症及治疗失误:诊断与可能的解决方法
Periodontol 2000. 2023 Jun;92(1):220-234. doi: 10.1111/prd.12474. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
10
Clinical evaluation of narrow-diameter implants versus standard-diameter implants with lateral bone augmentation in posterior jaws: Three-year results of a randomized controlled trial.后牙区窄直径种植体与标准直径种植体联合侧向骨增量的临床评估:一项随机对照试验的三年结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Dec;33(12):1245-1253. doi: 10.1111/clr.14006. Epub 2022 Oct 17.