Liverpool Shaun, Mc Donagh Ciarán, Feather Julie, Uzondu Chinebuli, Howarth Michelle, Bannerman Fariba, Kaehne Axel, Foster Celeste, Mateus Ceu
Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.
Transformative Transport Services Design Initiative (TRATSEDI), London, UK.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02722-9.
Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are increasingly recommended for children and young people (CYP) as a promising way to prevent and treat mental health problems. Here, we summarised and consolidated findings from existing systematic reviews to provide an overview of what is known, and which areas need further investigation. Systematic searches were conducted until January 2024 using PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus and Google Scholar. Records were screened against predefined criteria and quality assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews. A study protocol was co-developed with key stakeholders and registered on the Open Science Framework. From 941 records, 51 systematic reviews published between 2000 and 2023 of generally moderate quality, targeting CYP 0 to 25 years, were included in our narrative summary. DMHIs were delivered in a variety of ways, including online video calls, apps and various combinations, underpinned mostly by cognitive behaviour therapy. DMHIs supported different mental health problems, but mostly symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. Although generally effective, some studies reported mixed results with limited evidence when focusing on longer-term outcomes. Other benefits of DMHIs included reduced costs and time investments for families, and increased accessibility and acceptability of support. Practitioner preparedness and unclear ethics/safety measures were identified as factors impacting engagement and potential effectiveness. The findings suggest that DMHIs can be a valuable tool for supporting CYP. However, realising the full potential of DMHIs for all CYP may require more high-quality research utilising DMHIs that are diverse in theoretical underpinnings and target audiences.
数字心理健康干预措施(DMHIs)越来越多地被推荐用于儿童和青少年(CYP),作为预防和治疗心理健康问题的一种有前景的方法。在此,我们总结并整合了现有系统评价的结果,以概述已知情况以及哪些领域需要进一步研究。截至2024年1月,我们使用PubMed、PsycINFO、MEDLINE、CINAHL、Scopus和谷歌学术进行了系统检索。根据预定义标准对记录进行筛选,并使用评估系统评价的测量工具(AMSTAR - 2)和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)系统评价批判性评价清单对质量进行评估。我们与关键利益相关者共同制定了一项研究方案,并在开放科学框架上进行了注册。在941条记录中,我们的叙述性总结纳入了2000年至2023年间发表的51项系统评价,这些评价质量一般为中等,针对的是0至25岁的儿童和青少年。DMHIs通过多种方式提供,包括在线视频通话、应用程序以及各种组合,主要以认知行为疗法为基础。DMHIs对不同的心理健康问题有帮助,但主要是焦虑和/或抑郁症状。尽管总体上有效,但一些研究报告称,在关注长期结果时,结果喜忧参半且证据有限。DMHIs的其他益处包括降低家庭成本和时间投入,以及提高支持的可及性和可接受性。从业者的准备情况以及不明确的伦理/安全措施被确定为影响参与度和潜在效果的因素。研究结果表明,DMHIs可以成为支持儿童和青少年的有价值工具。然而,要充分发挥DMHIs对所有儿童和青少年的潜力,可能需要更多高质量的研究,这些研究要使用理论基础和目标受众多样的DMHIs。