Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Hunter St & Auckland St, 2300, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10536-1.
Despite the potential for improved population mental health and wellbeing, the integration of mental health digital interventions has been difficult to achieve. In this qualitative systematic review, we aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental healthcare systems, and map these to an implementation framework to inform policy development.
We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for primary research articles published between January 2010 and 2022. Studies were considered eligible if they reported barriers and/or facilitators to the integration of any digital mental healthcare technologies. Data were extracted using EPPI-Reviewer Web and analysed thematically via inductive and deductive cycles.
Of 12,525 references identified initially, 81 studies were included in the final analysis. Barriers and facilitators were grouped within an implementation (evidence-practice gap) framework across six domains, organised by four levels of mental healthcare systems. Broadly, implementation was hindered by the perception of digital technologies as impersonal tools that add additional burden of care onto both providers and patients, and change relational power asymmetries; an absence of resources; and regulatory complexities that impede access to universal coverage. Facilitators included person-cantered approaches that consider patients' intersectional features e.g., gender, class, disability, illness severity; evidence-based training for providers; collaboration among colleagues; appropriate investment in human and financial resources; and policy reforms that tackle universal access to digital health.
It is important to consider the complex and interrelated nature of barriers across different domains and levels of the mental health system. To facilitate the equitable, sustainable, and long-term digital transition of mental health systems, policymakers should consider a systemic approach to collaboration between public and private sectors to inform evidence-based planning and strengthen mental health systems.
The protocol is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42021276838.
尽管改善人口心理健康和福祉的潜力巨大,但精神健康数字干预措施的整合仍难以实现。在本次定性系统评价中,我们旨在确定精神卫生保健系统中数字技术实施的障碍和促进因素,并将其映射到实施框架,以为政策制定提供信息。
我们检索了 Medline、Embase、Scopus、PsycInfo、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar,以获取 2010 年 1 月至 2022 年期间发表的初级研究文章。如果研究报告了整合任何数字精神保健技术的障碍和/或促进因素,则认为其符合纳入标准。使用 EPPI-Reviewer Web 提取数据,并通过归纳和演绎循环进行主题分析。
最初确定了 12525 条参考文献,最终分析纳入了 81 项研究。障碍和促进因素在一个实施(证据-实践差距)框架内分组,共六个领域,由精神卫生保健系统的四个层面组织。总体而言,实施受到以下因素的阻碍:数字技术被视为非人性化工具,给提供者和患者增加了额外的护理负担,并改变了关系权力的不平衡;资源缺乏;以及监管复杂性阻碍了普及覆盖。促进因素包括以患者为中心的方法,这些方法考虑到患者的交叉特征,如性别、阶级、残疾、疾病严重程度;为提供者提供循证培训;同事之间的合作;适当投资人力和财力资源;以及解决数字健康普及问题的政策改革。
重要的是要考虑精神卫生系统不同领域和层面障碍的复杂和相互关联的性质。为了促进精神卫生系统的公平、可持续和长期数字转型,政策制定者应考虑公共和私营部门之间的系统合作方法,为循证规划提供信息,并加强精神卫生系统。
该方案已在 PROSPERO 上注册,CRD42021276838。