School of Psychology & Public Health, The Bouverie Centre, La Trobe University, 8 Gardiner Street, Brunswick, Melbourne, VA, 3056, Australia.
La Trobe University, Melbourne, VA, 3000, Australia.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Jun;27(2):424-475. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00469-4. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
Youth-specific digital mental health interventions (DMHI) represent an emerging field of study, and aim to increase access, improve socioemotional outcomes, and, where required, support triage to targeted interventions. However, prior reviews have reported inconsistent findings on the clinical effectiveness of such interventions in young adults (12-25 years). Further, shortfalls remain for the impact of guided interventions based on the mode of delivery and the type of human support personnel (e.g., professional or peer) guiding the intervention. In response, this systematic review, co-designed with Australia's leading mental health organization, aims to assess the effectiveness of guided digital programs in improving youth socioemotional outcomes. Included studies involve young people experiencing mental ill-health, receiving brief (i.e., 1-12 sessions), digitally delivered (at least partially) psychological interventions that were guided or partially guided, tested in a type of experimental study, with a socioemotional outcome. Specific socioemotional outcomes examined were depression, anxiety, stress, wellbeing, mindfulness, and quality of life. A systematic search of the contemporary published and grey literature identified 22,482 records with 32 relevant records published between 2018 and 2023. A narrative synthesis guided integration of findings. Results demonstrated strong evidence for the effectiveness of guided interventions on socioemotional outcomes (i.e., depression, anxiety, stress) yet these effects were short-lived. When factoring in the use of different control groups (i.e., active vs. inactive), inconsistent effects were observed for the socioemotional outcomes of depression, anxiety, and stress. The mode of delivery (i.e., asynchronous, synchronous, combined) and the type of human support personnel did not appear to impact socioemotional outcomes. Results indicate efficacious brief digital interventions for depression and anxiety include refresher/follow-up content, goal setting content, and relapse prevention content. In contrast, poor efficacy is associated with interventions that include homework tasks, self-monitoring, and log-keeping content.PROSPERO, ID CRD42023405812.
青年特定的数字心理健康干预(DMHI)代表了一个新兴的研究领域,旨在增加可及性、改善社会情感结果,并在需要时支持分诊到有针对性的干预措施。然而,先前的综述报告称,此类干预措施在年轻成年人(12-25 岁)中的临床效果不一致。此外,基于交付模式和指导干预的人类支持人员类型(例如专业人员或同伴),指导干预的影响仍存在不足。有鉴于此,本系统评价与澳大利亚领先的心理健康组织共同设计,旨在评估基于指导的数字计划在改善青年社会情感结果方面的有效性。纳入的研究涉及经历心理健康不良的年轻人,接受简短(即 1-12 次)、数字交付(至少部分)的心理干预措施,这些干预措施是指导或部分指导的,在一种实验性研究中进行测试,以社会情感结果为指标。检查的具体社会情感结果是抑郁、焦虑、压力、幸福感、正念和生活质量。对当代已发表和灰色文献的系统搜索确定了 22482 条记录,其中 2018 年至 2023 年期间发表了 32 条相关记录。叙事综合指导了结果的整合。结果表明,指导干预对社会情感结果(即抑郁、焦虑、压力)具有强有力的有效性证据,但这些效果是短暂的。当考虑使用不同的对照组(即主动与非活动)时,观察到社会情感结果的抑郁、焦虑和压力的效果不一致。交付模式(即异步、同步、组合)和人类支持人员的类型似乎不会影响社会情感结果。结果表明,对抑郁和焦虑有效的简短数字干预措施包括复习/随访内容、目标设定内容和复发预防内容。相比之下,与包含家庭作业任务、自我监测和记录内容的干预措施相比,效果不佳。PROSPERO,ID CRD42023405812。