Suppr超能文献

改良带抽吸功能的安普拉斯鞘与标准鞘用于经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径>2 cm的大型肾结石:一项前瞻性随机试验

Modified amplatz sheath with suction versus standard sheath in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating large renal stones > 2 cm: a prospective randomized trial.

作者信息

Fathi Abdallah, Ibrahem Mohammed, Mohammed Shabib, Mohamed Mostafa, ElAttar Kareem

机构信息

Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, 13511, Qalyubiya Governorate, Egypt.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2025 Apr 25;43(1):248. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05489-5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using a modified amplatz as an access sheath in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) compared to the standard Amplatz sheath for the treatment of renal stones larger than 2 cm.

METHODS

This prospective randomized study was conducted on 240 patients with renal stones larger than 2 cm who underwent PCNL. Patients were randomized into two equal groups: Group I (standard Amplatz sheath) and Group II (modified Amplatz sheath). Outcomes measured included operative time, stone-free rate (SFR), complications, and hospital stay.

RESULTS

The modified Amplatz sheath group had a significantly shorter mean operative time compared to the standard sheath group (56 ± 12 vs. 83 ± 17 min, respectively; P < 0.001). The SFR was higher in the modified sheath group (90.8% vs. 80%; P = 0.017). Postoperative complications, such as fever (4.2% vs. 10.8%) and pain (13.3% vs. 20.8%), were significantly lower in the modified sheath group (P = 0.036). The modified sheath group also had a shorter hospital stay, with 93.3% discharged within two days compared to 85% in the standard group (P = 0.038). Multivariate analysis indicated that the use of the modified sheath reduced the risk of residual stones by 91% (OR = 0.086, 95% CI = 0.027-0.280, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a modified Amplatz sheath in PCNL significantly reduces operative time, increases the SFR, and decreases postoperative complications compared to the standard Amplatz sheath.

摘要

目的

评估与标准安普拉斯鞘相比,改良安普拉斯鞘作为经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)入路鞘用于治疗直径大于2cm肾结石的有效性和安全性。

方法

对240例直径大于2cm且接受PCNL的肾结石患者进行了这项前瞻性随机研究。患者被随机分为两组,每组人数相等:第一组(标准安普拉斯鞘组)和第二组(改良安普拉斯鞘组)。测量的结果包括手术时间、结石清除率(SFR)、并发症和住院时间。

结果

与标准鞘组相比,改良安普拉斯鞘组的平均手术时间显著缩短(分别为56±12分钟和83±17分钟;P<0.001)。改良鞘组的SFR更高(90.8%对80%;P=0.017)。改良鞘组术后并发症如发热(4.2%对10.8%)和疼痛(13.3%对20.8%)明显更低(P=0.036)。改良鞘组的住院时间也更短,93.3%的患者在两天内出院,而标准组为85%(P=0.038)。多变量分析表明,使用改良鞘可使残留结石风险降低91%(OR=0.086,95%CI=0.027-0.280,P<0.001)。

结论

与标准安普拉斯鞘相比,在PCNL中使用改良安普拉斯鞘可显著缩短手术时间,提高SFR,并减少术后并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb89/12031787/73765563dc51/345_2025_5489_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验