• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术与小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)的比较。

Comparing femtosecond LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

作者信息

Ahluwalia Aneesha, Manche Edward E

机构信息

Byers Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 1;36(4):276-281. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001145. Epub 2025 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1097/ICU.0000000000001145
PMID:40279261
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review compares two refractive surgery modalities, femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), focusing on their efficacy, safety, postoperative recovery, and patient-reported outcomes. The aim is to provide an updated review of recent findings and identify areas for additional research to further optimize surgical outcomes and patient selection.

RECENT FINDINGS

FS-LASIK and SMILE show excellent, comparable visual outcomes for the correction of myopia and astigmatism. SMILE may have a lower risk of dry eye and has no flap-related complications, while FS-LASIK provides quicker visual recovery. SMILE may offer superior long-term visual outcomes, particularly for high myopia. However, customized FS-LASIK (wavefront- and topography-guided) outperform SMILE in some visual metrics, including uncorrected visual acuity and reduction in higher-order aberrations.

SUMMARY

FS-LASIK remains the gold standard refractive procedure due to its rapid recovery and predictable results, but SMILE offers advantages in preserving corneal biomechanical stability and potentially minimizing dry eye symptoms. SMILE may also offer improved long-term stability for patients at risk of myopic regression. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that wavefront- and topography-guided LASIK yield superior visual outcomes compared to SMILE. Additional long-term comparative studies are needed for different refractive treatment requirements.

摘要

综述目的

本综述比较了两种屈光手术方式,即飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)和小切口透镜切除术(SMILE),重点关注它们的疗效、安全性、术后恢复情况以及患者报告的结果。目的是对近期研究结果进行更新综述,并确定需要进一步研究的领域,以进一步优化手术效果和患者选择。

近期研究结果

FS-LASIK和SMILE在矫正近视和散光方面显示出优异且相当的视觉效果。SMILE可能干眼风险较低且无瓣相关并发症,而FS-LASIK视觉恢复更快。SMILE可能提供更好的长期视觉效果,尤其是对于高度近视。然而,定制的FS-LASIK(波前引导和地形图引导)在一些视觉指标上优于SMILE,包括裸眼视力和高阶像差的减少。

总结

由于其快速恢复和可预测的结果,FS-LASIK仍然是屈光手术的金标准,但SMILE在保持角膜生物力学稳定性和潜在最小化干眼症状方面具有优势。SMILE对于有近视回退风险的患者也可能提供更好的长期稳定性。然而,越来越多的证据表明,与SMILE相比,波前引导和地形图引导的LASIK产生更好的视觉效果。对于不同的屈光治疗需求,需要更多的长期比较研究。

相似文献

1
Comparing femtosecond LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术与小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)的比较。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 1;36(4):276-281. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001145. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism.小切口微透镜取出术(SMILE)和飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗近视和近视散光的 3 年疗效。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;103(4):565-568. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312140. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
3
Refractive outcomes comparing small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia.比较小切口微透镜取出术和飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗高度近视的屈光效果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Mar;46(3):419-427. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000075.
4
Five-year outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction vs femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: a contralateral eye study.小切口微透镜取出术与飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术的 5 年疗效比较:一项对侧眼研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Mar;46(3):403-409. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000067.
5
Comparison of corneal consumption in correcting high with-the-rule astigmatism between refractive lenticule extraction and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.屈光性晶状体微切口摘出术与准分子原位角膜磨镶术矫正高度顺规散光时角膜切削量的比较
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr;263(4):1147-1156. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06704-6. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
6
Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism.飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 联合 Smile 手术治疗近视或近视散光患者的视力和屈光效果比较。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;30(9):590-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140814-02.
7
Comparison of refractive outcomes and high-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for correcting high myopia and myopic astigmatism.小切口微透镜取出术与波前引导飞秒辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗高度近视及近视散光的屈光效果和高阶像差比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;40(12):3481-3489. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01534-x. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
8
Vector analysis of astigmatic correction after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond-assisted LASIK for low to moderate myopic astigmatism.小切口透镜切除术和飞秒辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗中低度近视散光后散光矫正的矢量分析
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;100(4):553-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307238. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
9
Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis versus small-incision lenticule extraction: current approach based on evidence.飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术与小切口透镜切除术:基于证据的当前方法
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 1;35(4):278-283. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001060. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
10
Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.SMILE 和飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 治疗近视的视觉效果比较。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Apr;30(4):248-54. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140320-03.