• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 联合 Smile 手术治疗近视或近视散光患者的视力和屈光效果比较。

Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;30(9):590-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140814-02.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20140814-02
PMID:25250415
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and refractive out-comes of femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in terms of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, aberrations, and dry eye.

METHODS

A single-center prospective randomized study in which patients diagnosed as having myopia presenting for refractive correction were allocated to either a LASIK or SMILE group. The primary outcome measures were refractive efficacy, predictability, and safety, postoperative contrast sensitivity, aberrations, and dry eye status. Patients were followed up at days 1 and 15 and 3 months; postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), aberrations, dry eye, and contrast sensitivity were recorded and compared to preoperative data. Two postoperative subjective questionnaires were used to assess pain, pricking sensation, redness, glare, and overall patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

At day 1 postoperatively, 48 (96%) of 50 eyes in the SMILE group achieved a UCVA of 20/20 compared with 46 (92%) of 50 eyes in the LASIK group. At day 15 postoperatively, contrast sensitivity was similar in the two groups (P = .15), but by 3 months, it was better in the SMILE group than the LASIK group at all spatial frequencies (P < .0001). At 3 months postoperatively, 42 (84%) eyes in each group achieved a UCVA of 20/20, with 6 (12%) eyes in the SMILE group and 2 (4%) eyes in the LASIK group achieving 20/15. Higher-order aberrations at 3 months postoperatively were significantly higher in the LASIK group (0.437 + 0.103 pm) than in the SMILE group (0.267 + 0.07 pm; P < .001). Postoperative dry eye and glare were significantly more common following LASIK (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Three-month results demonstrate that refractive accuracy, dry eye, contrast, and induced aberrations are better following SMILE rather than LASIK.

摘要

目的

比较飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 与小切口微透镜提取 (SMILE) 在视力、对比敏感度、像差和干眼症方面的视觉和屈光结果。

方法

这是一项单中心前瞻性随机研究,将诊断为近视并接受屈光矫正的患者分配到 LASIK 或 SMILE 组。主要观察指标为屈光疗效、可预测性和安全性、术后对比敏感度、像差和干眼症状况。患者在第 1 天、第 15 天和第 3 个月进行随访,记录并比较术后未矫正视力 (UCVA)、像差、干眼症和对比敏感度。使用两个术后主观问卷评估疼痛、刺痛感、发红、眩光和整体患者满意度。

结果

术后第 1 天,SMILE 组 50 只眼中有 48 只 (96%)达到 UCVA 20/20,而 LASIK 组 50 只眼中有 46 只 (92%)。术后第 15 天,两组对比敏感度相似 (P =.15),但 3 个月时,SMILE 组在所有空间频率均优于 LASIK 组 (P <.0001)。术后 3 个月,每组 42 只 (84%)眼达到 UCVA 20/20,SMILE 组有 6 只 (12%)眼和 LASIK 组有 2 只 (4%)眼达到 20/15。术后 3 个月,LASIK 组高阶像差 (0.437 + 0.103 pm)显著高于 SMILE 组 (0.267 + 0.07 pm;P <.001)。术后干眼症和眩光在 LASIK 后更为常见 (P <.001)。

结论

3 个月的结果表明,SMILE 术后的屈光准确性、干眼症、对比敏感度和诱导像差均优于 LASIK。

相似文献

1
Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism.飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 联合 Smile 手术治疗近视或近视散光患者的视力和屈光效果比较。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;30(9):590-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140814-02.
2
Clinical Outcomes After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视及近视散光的临床疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照研究
Cornea. 2016 Feb;35(2):210-6. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000707.
3
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Femtosecond LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction.随机对照临床试验比较飞秒 LASIK 和小切口微透镜切除术。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Jun;127(6):724-730. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism.小切口微透镜取出术(SMILE)和飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗近视和近视散光的 3 年疗效。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;103(4):565-568. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312140. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
5
Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.SMILE 和飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 治疗近视的视觉效果比较。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Apr;30(4):248-54. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140320-03.
6
Topography-Guided LASIK Versus Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Randomized, Prospective, Contralateral Eye Study.地形图引导的准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)治疗近视和近视散光:一项随机、前瞻性、对侧眼研究。
J Refract Surg. 2017 May 1;33(5):306-312. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170221-01.
7
Vector analysis of astigmatic correction after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond-assisted LASIK for low to moderate myopic astigmatism.小切口透镜切除术和飞秒辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗中低度近视散光后散光矫正的矢量分析
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;100(4):553-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307238. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
8
Comparison of efficacy and visual outcomes after SMILE and FS-LASIK for the correction of high myopia with the sum of myopia and astigmatism from -10.00 to -14.00 dioptres.SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 治疗等效球镜度数-10.00 至-14.00 度近视合并散光的疗效和视觉效果比较。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;98(2):e161-e172. doi: 10.1111/aos.14078. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
9
Two-years results of small-incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for Myopia.小切口微透镜取出术与波前像差引导准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视的两年疗效观察。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;96(2):e119-e126. doi: 10.1111/aos.13470. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
10
Refractive outcomes comparing small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia.比较小切口微透镜取出术和飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗高度近视的屈光效果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Mar;46(3):419-427. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000075.

引用本文的文献

1
The clinical outcomes of lamellar keratomileusis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus positivity.人类免疫缺陷病毒阳性患者的板层角膜屈光手术的临床结果。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug 19;25(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04313-3.
2
Dry eye after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK): a comparative clinical study.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(PRK)和经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(T-PRK)后干眼的比较临床研究。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 20;45(1):251. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03626-y.
3
Ten-year outcomes of effective optical zone and decentration analysis after keratorefractive lenticule extraction for moderate and high myopia.
中度和高度近视患者接受角膜屈光透镜切除术治疗后有效光学区和偏心分析的十年随访结果
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jun 13;40(1):278. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04508-6.
4
The impact of corneal epithelial remodeling on visual quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia.全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗高度近视后角膜上皮重塑对视觉质量的影响
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 5;25(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04168-8.
5
Knowledge and attitude of myopes or their guardians towards refractive surgery in Suzhou, China: a cross-sectional survey.中国苏州近视患者或其监护人对屈光手术的认知与态度:一项横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 27;15(3):e092125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092125.
6
The long-term effects of interface irrigation on visual outcomes and corneal aberrations in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).界面冲洗对小切口透镜切除术(SMILE)视觉效果和角膜像差的长期影响。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 1;73(7):1005-1011. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1856_24. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
7
Femtosecond-laser-assisted Small Incision Lenticule Extraction to Treat Refractive Error: A Narrative Review.飞秒激光辅助小切口透镜切除术治疗屈光不正:一项叙述性综述
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 2;30(4):203-213. doi: 10.4103/meajo.meajo_149_23. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
8
Stability of small incision lenticule extraction over laser in situ keratomileusis at an altitude of 3874 m.海拔3874米处小切口基质透镜切除术与准分子原位角膜磨镶术相比的稳定性
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):2045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85740-6.
9
Comparison of objective visual quality between SMILE and FS-LASIK in moderate-to-high myopia.SMILE与FS-LASIK治疗中高度近视的客观视觉质量比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 13;11:1408516. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408516. eCollection 2024.
10
Comparison of early visual outcomes after SMILE using VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500 for myopia: a retrospective matched case-control study.SMILE 术中应用 VISUMAX 800 和 VISUMAX 500 治疗近视的早期视觉效果比较:一项回顾性配对病例对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 25;14(1):11989. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62354-y.