Whitcomb Holly, Roberts Lisa C, Ryan Clare
School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.
School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, UK; Therapy Services Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2025 Jun;77:103325. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103325. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
Low back pain affects individuals and society, straining Emergency Departments (EDs) and prolonging wait times. While personal factors influence ED visits, third-party advice's role is underexplored. Limited guidance for healthcare professionals emphasises the need for effective back pain management to ease system strain and improve patient outcomes. This study examines motivations for ED visits due to low back pain.
This research utilised secondary analysis of qualitative data from a previous multisite study, adopting a subtle realist approach. From August to December 2021, 47 patients (26 M:21 F, aged 23-79) with back pain were sampled from four English EDs (2 Northern, 2 Southern) to capture diversity in sociodemographic and LBP characteristics. Eight patients had previously visited the ED for this back pain episode. During the pandemic, semi-structured interviews were conducted online, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically. Three key themes influenced decisions to attend ED: Healthcare professionals, trusted others, and individuals. Healthcare professionals often dictated choices, making participants feel powerless. Trusted others offered varying support, acting as allies. Individuals wrestled with anxiety about pain severity and uncertainty regarding LBP.
This study emphasises the need for healthcare professionals to offer clear guidance on when individuals and their caregivers should visit the ED for back pain. Findings show that pain-related worries significantly drive ED visits, misaligning with practice guidelines. Healthcare providers must consider these issues when creating strategies to manage low back pain patients and optimise ED resources.
腰痛影响个人和社会,给急诊科带来压力并延长等待时间。虽然个人因素会影响急诊科就诊,但第三方建议的作用尚未得到充分探索。针对医疗保健专业人员的指导有限,强调需要进行有效的腰痛管理以缓解系统压力并改善患者预后。本研究探讨了因腰痛前往急诊科就诊的动机。
本研究采用微妙实在论方法,对先前一项多地点研究的定性数据进行二次分析。2021年8月至12月,从英国的四个急诊科(两个北部、两个南部)抽取了47名背痛患者(26名男性:21名女性,年龄23 - 79岁),以获取社会人口统计学和腰痛特征方面的多样性。其中8名患者此前因本次腰痛发作去过急诊科。在疫情期间,通过在线方式进行了半结构化访谈,进行了录音、转录并进行主题分析。影响前往急诊科就诊决策的三个关键主题是:医疗保健专业人员、可信赖的他人和个人。医疗保健专业人员常常决定了选择,让参与者感到无力。可信赖的他人提供了不同程度的支持,充当盟友。个人则纠结于对疼痛严重程度的焦虑以及腰痛的不确定性。
本研究强调医疗保健专业人员需要就个人及其护理人员何时应因腰痛前往急诊科提供明确指导。研究结果表明,与疼痛相关的担忧是促使患者前往急诊科就诊的重要原因,这与实践指南不符。医疗服务提供者在制定管理腰痛患者的策略和优化急诊科资源时必须考虑这些问题。