Tiao Justin, Kator Jamie, Rosenberg Ashley M, Wang Kevin C, Stern Brocha Z, Bienstock Dennis, Hoang Tim, Gladstone James N, Anthony Shawn G
Leni and Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, U.S.A.
University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCSF School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.027.
To elucidate patient out-of-pocket costs associated with arthroscopic and nonoperative treatment of anterior shoulder instability, with a secondary aim to examine the costs of conversion from nonoperative to arthroscopic treatment within 12 months after initial shoulder instability diagnosis.
The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database was used to identify patients aged 18 to 40 years with anterior shoulder instability via diagnosis codes from 2014 to 2017. Three cohorts were created: an operative cohort, a nonoperative cohort, and an operative conversion cohort. The operative cohort was initially treated with primary arthroscopic shoulder surgery. The nonoperative cohort was treated with physical therapy. The conversion cohort was initially treated nonoperatively and then converted to operative management. Eighty-one patients with failed arthroscopic treatment were excluded. Open stabilization procedures were excluded as well. Patient out-of-pocket costs were calculated for each cohort and compared.
In total, 713 operative, 1,144 nonoperative, and 79 conversion cohort patients were identified. Initial nonoperative treatment failed in approximately 6% of patients (79 of 1,223). Patients in the operative cohort were more likely to be men (percentage of male patients, 78% vs 69%; P < .001) and to be younger (median age, 21 years vs 26 years; P < .001) than those in the nonoperative cohort. Nonoperative treatment had the lowest patient out-of-pocket cost ($998 for nonoperative vs $1,961 for operative, P < .001), and conversion to operative treatment had the highest patient cost ($2,230). The additional cost of physical therapy, when nonoperative treatment fails, played a significant role in this difference.
Among patients presenting for evaluation of anterior shoulder instability, converting from nonoperative to arthroscopic treatment does not significantly increase patient costs compared with initial arthroscopic intervention. However, both treatment pathways are roughly 2 times more costly to the patient than isolated nonoperative management.
This study shows that nonoperative management of anterior shoulder instability is associated with the lowest patient out-of-pocket costs whereas conversion from nonoperative to arthroscopic treatment results in the highest costs. These findings highlight the financial implications of treatment selection and the potential cost burden for patients in whom initial conservative management fails.
阐明与肩关节前不稳定的关节镜治疗和非手术治疗相关的患者自付费用,次要目的是研究在初次肩关节不稳定诊断后12个月内从非手术治疗转为关节镜治疗的费用。
使用MarketScan商业索赔和病历数据库,通过2014年至2017年的诊断代码识别年龄在18至40岁之间的肩关节前不稳定患者。创建了三个队列:手术队列、非手术队列和手术转换队列。手术队列最初接受原发性肩关节镜手术治疗。非手术队列接受物理治疗。转换队列最初接受非手术治疗,然后转为手术治疗。排除81例关节镜治疗失败的患者。也排除开放稳定手术。计算每个队列的患者自付费用并进行比较。
总共确定了713例手术队列患者、1144例非手术队列患者和79例转换队列患者。约6%的患者(1223例中的79例)初始非手术治疗失败。手术队列中的患者比非手术队列中的患者更可能为男性(男性患者百分比,78%对69%;P<.001)且更年轻(中位年龄,21岁对26岁;P<.001)。非手术治疗的患者自付费用最低(非手术治疗为998美元,手术治疗为1961美元,P<.001),转为手术治疗的患者费用最高(2230美元)。非手术治疗失败时物理治疗的额外费用在这种差异中起了重要作用。
在前来评估肩关节前不稳定的患者中,与初次关节镜干预相比,从非手术治疗转为关节镜治疗不会显著增加患者费用。然而,两种治疗途径对患者的成本大约都是单纯非手术治疗的2倍。
本研究表明,肩关节前不稳定的非手术治疗与患者自付费用最低相关,而从非手术治疗转为关节镜治疗导致费用最高。这些发现突出了治疗选择的财务影响以及初始保守治疗失败患者的潜在成本负担。