• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心经验:直接口服抗凝剂使用相关的心包积液

Pericardial Effusion Associated With Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in a Single Center Experience.

作者信息

Song Jessica, Jaradeh Mark, Xu William, Deluna Andres, Sevak Rajkumar J, Wang Clifford, Zhao Susan X

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of the Pacific School of Pharmacy, PHS 299, Stockton, California, USA.

Department of Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California, USA.

出版信息

JACC Adv. 2025 Apr;4(4):101612. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101612. Epub 2025 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101612
PMID:40280703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12139233/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pericardial effusion (PEff) has been described to occur in association with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, characteristics, and predisposing factors of PEff associated with DOACs.

METHODS

In this retrospective single center study, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with PEff in adult patients (age ≥18 years) in the Santa Clara Health System between 2013 and 2023.

RESULTS

Of the 456 patients with at least small to moderate PEff, 50 were on DOACs (DOAC PEff), 16 on warfarin (warfarin PEff), and 390 with no anticoagulation (NA PEff), with annual incidence 0.069%, 0.047%, and 0.001% for DOAC, warfarin, and NA PEff, respectively. Twenty-five (50%) of the DOAC PEff cases had moderately large or large PEff. Twenty-one cases underwent either percutaneous or surgical drainage. The DOAC PEff patients were significantly older and with more concurrent use of amiodarone. Logistic regression identified the following factors associated with moderately large or large PEff: DOAC (OR: 2.28; 95% CI: 1.19-4.37), warfarin (OR: 5.50; 95% CI: 1.88-16.06), concurrent use of amiodarone (OR: 4.32; 95% CI: 1.46-12.78), and presence of solid tumor (OR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.25-3.39).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest single center case series of DOAC PEff, with annual incidence higher than previously reported. Future research is needed to study the pharmacokinetic interactions between DOACs and commonly co-prescribed drugs as well as the cost-effectiveness of enhanced surveillance of PEff in those with solid cancer while on DOACs.

摘要

背景

心包积液(PEff)已被描述为与直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)相关。

目的

本研究的目的是评估与DOAC相关的心包积液的发生率、特征和易感因素。

方法

在这项回顾性单中心研究中,采用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定2013年至2023年期间圣克拉拉卫生系统中成年患者(年龄≥18岁)与心包积液相关的因素。

结果

在456例至少有轻度至中度心包积液的患者中,50例使用DOAC(DOAC心包积液),16例使用华法林(华法林心包积液),390例未进行抗凝(非抗凝心包积液),DOAC、华法林和非抗凝心包积液的年发生率分别为0.069%、0.047%和0.001%。25例(50%)DOAC心包积液病例有心包积液中度或大量。21例患者接受了经皮或手术引流。DOAC心包积液患者年龄明显更大,且更常同时使用胺碘酮。逻辑回归确定了以下与中度或大量心包积液相关的因素:DOAC(比值比:2.28;95%置信区间:1.19 - 4.37)、华法林(比值比:5.50;95%置信区间:1.88 - 16.06)、同时使用胺碘酮(比值比:4.32;95%置信区间:1.46 - 12.78)和实体瘤的存在(比值比:2.06;95%置信区间:1.25 - 3.39)。

结论

这是最大的关于DOAC心包积液的单中心病例系列,年发生率高于先前报道。未来需要研究DOAC与常用联合处方药物之间的药代动力学相互作用,以及对接受DOAC治疗的实体癌患者加强心包积液监测的成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f7/12139233/08a58cc97d78/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f7/12139233/08a58cc97d78/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f7/12139233/6d7c91c9350e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f7/12139233/08a58cc97d78/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f7/12139233/08a58cc97d78/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f7/12139233/6d7c91c9350e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f7/12139233/08a58cc97d78/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Pericardial Effusion Associated With Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in a Single Center Experience.单中心经验:直接口服抗凝剂使用相关的心包积液
JACC Adv. 2025 Apr;4(4):101612. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101612. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
Clinical Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Extended Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林用于静脉血栓栓塞症延长治疗的临床结局比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328033. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28033.
3
Potential interactions between medications for rate control and direct oral anticoagulants: Population-based cohort and case-crossover study.速率控制药物与直接口服抗凝剂之间的潜在相互作用:基于人群的队列和病例交叉研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Dec;21(12):2445-2454. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.06.033. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
Trends and Predictors of Oral Anticoagulant Use in People with Alzheimer's Disease and the General Population in Australia.澳大利亚阿尔茨海默病患者和普通人群中口服抗凝剂使用的趋势和预测因素。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(3):733-745. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190094.
5
Self-reported adherence to direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin therapy in a specialized thrombosis service-a cross-sectional study of patients in a Canadian Health Region.在一家专门的血栓形成治疗机构中,自我报告的直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗的依从性——对加拿大一个健康区域患者的横断面研究
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jan;79(1):117-125. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03418-8. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
Oral anticoagulation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Japan.日本肥厚型心肌病合并非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的口服抗凝治疗
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;12(1):326-337. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15039. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
7
Direct Oral Anticoagulants Are Associated with Superior Survival Outcomes than Warfarin in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers.在头颈癌患者中,直接口服抗凝剂比华法林具有更好的生存结局。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 29;14(3):703. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030703.
8
Association of Alternative Anticoagulation Strategies and Outcomes in Patients With Ischemic Stroke While Taking a Direct Oral Anticoagulant.直接口服抗凝药物治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者的替代抗凝策略与结局的相关性。
Neurology. 2023 Jul 25;101(4):e358-e369. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207422. Epub 2023 May 24.
9
Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Across the Spectrum of Kidney Function: Patient-Level Network Meta-Analyses From COMBINE AF.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在肾功能谱中的比较:来自 COMBINE AF 的患者水平网络荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2023 Jun 6;147(23):1748-1757. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062752. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
10
Risk of bleeding with the concurrent use of amiodarone and DOACs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胺碘酮与直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)联合使用时的出血风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 May 2;11(3):241-250. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae097.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiac Tamponade in Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants.直接口服抗凝剂治疗患者的心包填塞。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2023 Jun;25(6):430-433.
2
Impact of amiodarone on plasma concentration of direct oral anticoagulant in patients with atrial fibrillation.胺碘酮对房颤患者直接口服抗凝剂血浆浓度的影响。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2023 Aug;122(8):776-784. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.02.012. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
3
To Measure or Not to Measure: Direct Oral Anticoagulant Laboratory Assay Monitoring in Clinical Practice.测还是不测:临床实践中直接口服抗凝剂的实验室检测监测
Adv Hematol. 2023 Feb 22;2023:9511499. doi: 10.1155/2023/9511499. eCollection 2023.
4
Trends in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescribing in English primary care (2014-2019).英国初级医疗保健中直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)处方的趋势(2014 - 2019年)
Heart. 2023 Jan 11;109(3):195-201. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321377.
5
Trends in Oral Anticoagulant Use Among 436 864 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Community Practice, 2011 to 2020.2011 年至 2020 年社区实践中 436864 例房颤患者口服抗凝剂使用趋势。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Nov 15;11(22):e026723. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026723. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
6
Association Between Concurrent Use of Amiodarone and DOACs and Risk of Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.胺碘酮与 DOACs 同时使用与房颤患者出血风险的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Jan 1;186:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.10.031. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
7
Prognostic Value of Pericardial Effusion Size in Patients with Acute Heart Failure.心包积液量对急性心力衰竭患者的预后价值。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2022;20(6):508-516. doi: 10.2174/1570161120666220721094739.
8
Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Patient-Level Network Meta-Analyses of Randomized Clinical Trials With Interaction Testing by Age and Sex.直接口服抗凝药与华法林在心房颤动患者中的比较:按年龄和性别进行交互测试的随机临床试验的患者水平网络荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2022 Jan 25;145(4):242-255. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056355. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
9
Clinician Trends in Prescribing Direct Oral Anticoagulants for US Medicare Beneficiaries.美国医疗保险受益人群中临床医生开具直接口服抗凝药物的趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2137288. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37288.
10
Hemopericardium in the Setting of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use: An Updated Systematic Review.直接口服抗凝剂应用背景下的心包积血:一项更新的系统评价。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jun;39:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Sep 29.