Suppr超能文献

良性前列腺增生微创治疗后的短期结果:比较经会阴激光消融和水蒸气消融的首个随机试验

Short term results after minimally invasive treatments for benign prostatic enlargement: the first randomized trial comparing transperineal laser ablation and water vapor ablation.

作者信息

Pacini Matteo, Zucchi Alessandro, Salonia Andrea, Sollazzi Eleonora, Macrì Giada, Volterrani Rachele, Bini Vittorio, Antonov Petar, Ivanov Atanas, d'Arma Alessia, De Nunzio Cosimo, Bartoletti Riccardo

机构信息

Urology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy.

Department of Urology and General Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-00972-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interest in minimally invasive techniques (MISTs) for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has increased over the years due to their ability to improve symptoms while minimizing complications. Moreover, these procedures can be performed in an outpatient setting, potentially reducing patients' discomfort. The aim of our randomized trial is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of Transperineal Laser Ablation (TPLA) and Water Vapor Ablation (WVA) in the treatment of BPH.

METHODS

Eighty consecutive patients were randomized 1:1 to the two techniques between January and July 2024. Both procedures were under conscious sedations and patients were same day discharged. All patients underwent standardized follow-up, including International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) and uroflowmetry assessments at 3- and 6-months post-treatment.

RESULTS

At 6 months, IPSS and Quality of Life (QoL) scores improved significantly from baseline (p < 0.001), in favor of TPLA at both time points (p ≤ 0.03). General Linear Model analysis showed that QoL improvement was faster in the TPLA group (p: 0.005), though no significant difference persisted at 6 months. Uroflow parameters, including maximum flow, average flow, and post-void residual volume, demonstrated significant improvement without notable differences between the two groups (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). All patients were same day discharged, except one who required prolonged continuous bladder irrigation. Postoperative complications occurred in 11 cases, with only one (a prostatic abscess) classified as Clavien-Dindo ≥3. The main limitations of the study are the sample size and short follow-up duration.

CONCLUSIONS

TPLA and WVA are safe outpatient procedures that provide comparable functional outcomes. However, TPLA appears to offer a faster improvement in patient-reported symptoms.

摘要

背景

多年来,由于微创技术(MISTs)能够改善症状并将并发症降至最低,人们对其治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的兴趣与日俱增。此外,这些手术可以在门诊进行,有可能减轻患者的不适。我们随机试验的目的是评估和比较经会阴激光消融(TPLA)和水蒸气消融(WVA)治疗BPH的疗效。

方法

2024年1月至7月,80例连续患者按1:1随机分为两种技术组。两种手术均在清醒镇静下进行,患者均于同日出院。所有患者均接受标准化随访,包括在治疗后3个月和6个月进行国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)和尿流率评估。

结果

在6个月时,IPSS和生活质量(QoL)评分较基线显著改善(p < 0.001),在两个时间点均有利于TPLA(p ≤ 0.03)。一般线性模型分析显示,TPLA组的QoL改善更快(p: 0.005),尽管在6个月时没有持续的显著差异。尿流参数,包括最大尿流率、平均尿流率和残余尿量,均有显著改善,两组之间无明显差异(所有比较p < 0.001)。除1例需要延长持续膀胱冲洗外,所有患者均于同日出院。术后并发症发生11例,只有1例(前列腺脓肿)分类为Clavien-Dindo ≥3级。本研究的主要局限性是样本量和随访时间短。

结论

TPLA和WVA是安全的门诊手术,功能结局相当。然而,TPLA似乎能更快地改善患者报告的症状。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验