• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于水平上颌牙槽嵴增高的牙壳与骨壳技术

Tooth shell versus bone shell technique for horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation.

作者信息

Awad Khaled Ahmed Ibrahim, Tawik Mohamed Abdel-Monem, Hussein Mohamed Mohamed, El-Farag Shaimaa Ahmed Abo, Sameaa Sally El Sayed Abdel

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Kafr El-Sheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt.

Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05940-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05940-4
PMID:40281533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12032675/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate the clinical and radiographical outcome of tooth shell for maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation as an alternative to traditional autogenous bone shell graft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty eight patients with one or two maxillary extracted teeth (esthetic zone) in need for horizontal bone augmentation were divided into two groups (14 patients each). Group I (control group): bone augmentation was done by using bone shell technique (BST). Group II (study group): bone augmentation was done by using tooth shell technique (TST). Implant stability was evaluated at the time of implant placement, after 4 months (loading time), and 4 months after loading. Radiographic evaluation was made using Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans before grafting (T0), immediately (T1), and 6 months post grafting (T2).

RESULTS

In this study, 30 implants were inserted in the esthetic zone. All implants were successfully osseointegrated. No statistically significant difference was found between the studied groups as regards implant stability (P > 0.05) assessed baseline, 4 months after implant placement, and 4 months after loading. The radiographic evaluation demonstrated a statistically significant lower median amount of graft resorption at 1 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm & total among the study than the control group (p = 0.001, 0.001, 0.04 & 0.001 respectively).

CONCLUSION

TST used for lateral ridge augmentation has excellent dimensional stability and the least amount of graft resorption.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered on www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov with registration number (NCT06416605) on 16 /5 /2024.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估牙壳用于上颌牙槽嵴增高术的临床和影像学效果,作为传统自体骨壳移植的替代方法。

材料与方法

28例需要进行水平骨增量的上颌单颗或两颗拔牙(美学区)患者被分为两组(每组14例)。第一组(对照组):采用骨壳技术(BST)进行骨增量。第二组(研究组):采用牙壳技术(TST)进行骨增量。在种植体植入时、4个月后(加载时间)以及加载后4个月评估种植体稳定性。在植骨前(T0)、植骨后即刻(T1)和植骨后6个月(T2)使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)进行影像学评估。

结果

本研究在美学区植入了30颗种植体。所有种植体均成功实现骨整合。在评估基线、种植体植入后4个月和加载后4个月时,研究组之间在种植体稳定性方面未发现统计学上的显著差异(P>0.05)。影像学评估显示,研究组在1mm、5mm和10mm处以及总体上的植骨吸收中位数在统计学上显著低于对照组(分别为p = 0.001、0.001、0.04和0.001)。

结论

用于侧方牙槽嵴增高的牙壳技术具有出色的尺寸稳定性和最少的植骨吸收量。

试验注册

本研究于2024年5月16日在www.CLINICALTRIALS.gov上进行回顾性注册,注册号为(NCT06416605)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/12032675/b91465f676a9/12903_2025_5940_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/12032675/efd67f5e09d8/12903_2025_5940_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/12032675/acfcd0097688/12903_2025_5940_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/12032675/8aecc74406d0/12903_2025_5940_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/12032675/69705d481320/12903_2025_5940_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/12032675/b91465f676a9/12903_2025_5940_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/12032675/efd67f5e09d8/12903_2025_5940_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/12032675/acfcd0097688/12903_2025_5940_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/12032675/8aecc74406d0/12903_2025_5940_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/12032675/69705d481320/12903_2025_5940_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/12032675/b91465f676a9/12903_2025_5940_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Tooth shell versus bone shell technique for horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation.用于水平上颌牙槽嵴增高的牙壳与骨壳技术
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05940-4.
2
The influence of bone block graft position on bone dimensional changes in staged onlay horizontal ridge augmentation: A 6-month retrospective cohort study.分阶段块状骨移植水平骨增量术中骨块位置对骨量变化的影响:一项 6 个月回顾性队列研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Sep;35(9):1091-1100. doi: 10.1111/clr.14299. Epub 2024 May 24.
3
Bone augmentation with autologous tooth shell in the esthetic zone for dental implant restoration: a pilot study.自体牙壳在美学区用于牙种植体修复的骨增量:一项初步研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Nov 8;7(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00389-w.
4
Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.用于在上颌和下颌萎缩无牙颌中植入种植体的替代性骨扩张技术。
J Oral Implantol. 2011 Aug;37(4):463-71. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00028. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
5
Horizontal ridge augmentation of the atrophic anterior maxilla using rhBMP-2/ACS or autogenous bone grafts: a proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial.采用 rhBMP-2/ACS 或自体骨移植对萎缩性前上颌骨进行水平嵴增高:一项概念验证随机临床试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Oct;40(10):968-75. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12148.
6
A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement surgery: I. Clinical and radiographic parameters.一项评估三明治式骨增量技术在种植体植入手术中增加颊侧骨厚度疗效的随机临床试验:I. 临床和影像学参数
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Apr;25(4):458-67. doi: 10.1111/clr.12171. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
7
Maxilla reconstruction with autogenous bone block grafts: computed tomography evaluation and implant survival in a 5-year retrospective study.自体骨块移植上颌骨重建:一项5年回顾性研究中的计算机断层扫描评估与种植体存留率
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Aug;46(8):1045-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
8
Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh and a combination of autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone: a 2-year prospective study.使用钛网及自体骨与无机牛骨联合进行牙槽嵴增高术:一项为期2年的前瞻性研究。
J Periodontol. 2008 Nov;79(11):2093-103. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.080061.
9
Autogenous dentin block versus bone block for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation and staged implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial including histologic assessment.自体牙本质块与骨块用于水平牙槽嵴增量和分期种植体植入:一项包括组织学评估的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jul;33(7):723-734. doi: 10.1111/clr.13936. Epub 2022 May 13.
10
[Clinical effects of ridge augmentation with the half-columnar shaped mandibular bone block for the placement of dental implants].[半柱状下颌骨块骨增量术用于牙种植体植入的临床效果]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2010 Feb 18;42(1):94-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Immediate Implantation with Autologous Mineralized Dentin Graft versus Deproteinized Bovine Bone as Space-Filling Substitute in Maxillary Anterior Zone: Retrospective Radiological and Clinical Study.在上颌前牙区使用自体矿化牙本质移植物与脱蛋白牛骨作为空间填充替代物的即刻种植:回顾性放射学和临床研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 18;13(18):5521. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185521.
2
Immediately placed implants using simvastatin and autogenous tooth graft combination in periodontally compromised sites: a randomized controlled clinical trial.在牙周病损部位即刻植入载有辛伐他汀的自体牙骨粉:一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 12;28(4):210. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05596-4.
3
Autogenous dentin block versus bone block for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation and staged implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial including histologic assessment.
自体牙本质块与骨块用于水平牙槽嵴增量和分期种植体植入:一项包括组织学评估的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jul;33(7):723-734. doi: 10.1111/clr.13936. Epub 2022 May 13.
4
Comparison of Autogenous Tooth Materials and Other Bone Grafts.自体牙材料与其他骨移植物的比较。
Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2021 Jun;18(3):327-341. doi: 10.1007/s13770-021-00333-4. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
5
Retrospective Study: Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Dentin: Tooth-Shell Technique vs. Bone-Shell Technique.回顾性研究:自体牙本质的侧向牙槽嵴扩增:牙壳技术与骨壳技术。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 19;18(6):3174. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063174.
6
Bio-Absorption of Human Dentin-Derived Biomaterial in Sheep Critical-Size Iliac Defects.人牙本质衍生生物材料在绵羊临界尺寸髂骨缺损中的生物吸收
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 5;14(1):223. doi: 10.3390/ma14010223.
7
Autogenous Dentin Shell Grafts Versus Bone Shell Grafts for Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction: A Novel Technique with Preliminary Results of a Prospective Clinical Study.自体牙本质壳移植与骨壳移植用于牙槽嵴重建:一项新技术及前瞻性临床研究的初步结果
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019 Nov/Dec;39(6):885-893. doi: 10.11607/prd.4344.
8
Lateral alveolar ridge augmentation with autogenous block grafts fixed at a distance vs resorbable poly-D-L-lactide foil fixed at a distance: 5-year results of a single-blind, randomised controlled trial.自体块状移植物固定于距离的外侧牙槽嵴增量与可吸收聚-D-丙交酯膜固定于距离的外侧牙槽嵴增量:一项单盲、随机对照试验的 5 年结果。
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019;12(3):299-312.
9
Histomorphometrical assessment of vertical alveolar ridge augmentation using extracted tooth roots in the canine.应用于犬牙的拔除牙根进行垂直牙槽嵴增高的组织形态计量学评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jan;24(1):317-323. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02960-7. Epub 2019 May 17.
10
Autogenous tooth roots for lateral extraction socket augmentation and staged implant placement. A prospective observational study.自体牙用于侧向拔牙窝骨增量和分期种植体植入。一项前瞻性观察研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 May;30(5):439-446. doi: 10.1111/clr.13429. Epub 2019 Apr 22.