• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮内镜下单侧部分椎板切除术对腰椎稳定性影响的体外生物力学实验

In Vitro Biomechanical Experiment on the Effect of Unilateral Partial Facetectomy Performed by Percutaneous Endoscopy on the Stability of Lumbar Spine.

作者信息

Ma Tao, Tu Xiaoshuang, Li Junyang, Wu Jingwei, Nong Luming

机构信息

Orthopedics Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213164, China.

Orthopaedics Department, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211103, China.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Apr 14;12(4):414. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12040414.

DOI:10.3390/bioengineering12040414
PMID:40281774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12024851/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study's purpose is to investigate the lumbar biomechanical effects of unilateral partial facetectomy (UPF) of different facet joint (FJ) portions under percutaneous endoscopy.

METHODS

Forty fresh calf spine models were used to simulate UPF under a physiological load performed through three commonly used needle insertion points (IPs): (1) The apex of the superior FJ (as the first IP); (2) The midpoint of the ventral side of the superior FJ (as the second IP); (3) The lowest point of the ventral side of the superior FJ (as the third IP). The range of motion (ROM) and the L4/5 intradiscal maximum pressure (IMP) were measured and analyzed under a physiological load in all models during flexion, extension, left-right lateral flexion, and left-right axial rotation.

RESULTS

When UPF was performed through the second IP, the ROM of the lumbar spine and the L4/5 IMP in the calf spine models were not statistically different from the intact calf spine model.

CONCLUSIONS

UPF through the second IP resulted in a minimal impact on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine. Thus, it might be considered the most appropriate IP for UPF.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨经皮内镜下不同关节突关节(FJ)部分的单侧部分关节突切除术(UPF)对腰椎生物力学的影响。

方法

使用40个新鲜小牛脊柱模型,通过三个常用的进针点(IP)在生理负荷下模拟UPF:(1)上关节突的顶点(作为第一个进针点);(2)上关节突腹侧的中点(作为第二个进针点);(3)上关节突腹侧的最低点(作为第三个进针点)。在所有模型的生理负荷下,测量并分析在屈曲、伸展、左右侧屈和左右轴向旋转过程中的活动范围(ROM)和L4/5椎间盘内最大压力(IMP)。

结果

当通过第二个进针点进行UPF时,小牛脊柱模型中腰椎的ROM和L4/5 IMP与完整小牛脊柱模型相比无统计学差异。

结论

通过第二个进针点进行UPF对腰椎生物力学的影响最小。因此,它可能被认为是UPF最合适的进针点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b00/12024851/caf3f6d38052/bioengineering-12-00414-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b00/12024851/bc096b74984e/bioengineering-12-00414-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b00/12024851/a9e5b443cbb5/bioengineering-12-00414-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b00/12024851/caf3f6d38052/bioengineering-12-00414-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b00/12024851/bc096b74984e/bioengineering-12-00414-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b00/12024851/a9e5b443cbb5/bioengineering-12-00414-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b00/12024851/caf3f6d38052/bioengineering-12-00414-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
In Vitro Biomechanical Experiment on the Effect of Unilateral Partial Facetectomy Performed by Percutaneous Endoscopy on the Stability of Lumbar Spine.经皮内镜下单侧部分椎板切除术对腰椎稳定性影响的体外生物力学实验
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Apr 14;12(4):414. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12040414.
2
Biomechanical Model Study of the Effect of Partial Facetectomy on Lumbar Stability Under Percutaneous Endoscopy.经皮内镜下部分椎板切除术对腰椎稳定性影响的生物力学模型研究
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:e255-e264. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.190. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
3
Effect of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminoplasty of Different Facet Joint Portions on Lumbar Biomechanics: A Finite Element Analysis.不同关节突部分经皮内镜腰椎侧方椎间孔成形术对腰椎生物力学的影响:有限元分析。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug;12(4):1277-1284. doi: 10.1111/os.12740. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
4
Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.全椎板切除-关节突切除术后置入全关节突置换系统对植入节段及相邻节段生物力学的影响。
Spine J. 2009 Jan-Feb;9(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.01.010. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
5
Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.单节段后路与经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术双侧椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学比较:节段稳定性及对相邻运动节段的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jun;12(6):700-8. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.SPINE09123.
6
Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.腰椎经皮椎弓根固定术中上段双侧关节突关节破坏:严重破坏的生物力学研究 第三部分
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 1;45(9):E508-E514. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003327.
7
Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.一种新型全后元件置换系统的生物力学评估
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245872.45554.c0.
8
Biomechanical Effect of L -L Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on the Lower Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study.L-L型椎间盘退变对下腰椎的生物力学影响:一项有限元研究
Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(3):917-930. doi: 10.1111/os.12703. Epub 2020 May 31.
9
Effect of Graded Facetectomy on Lumbar Biomechanics.分级小关节切除对腰椎生物力学的影响。
J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:7981513. doi: 10.1155/2017/7981513. Epub 2017 Feb 19.
10
Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.小关节突切除术和椎间盘切除术后后路动态稳定装置(DIAM)的生物力学
Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):714-22. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.02.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical restoration in unilateral facet arthroplasty: a cadaveric evaluation.单侧小关节置换术中的生物力学重建:尸体评估
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jun 29;23:100766. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100766. eCollection 2025 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Percutaneous transforaminal full endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.经皮椎间孔全内镜减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Aug 14;21(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03566-x.
2
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Fenestration Discectomy to Treat Posterior Ring Apophyseal Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.经皮椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术和开窗式椎间盘切除术治疗后环椎弓根骨折:一项回顾性队列研究。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug;12(4):1092-1099. doi: 10.1111/os.12698. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Biomechanical contribution of spinal structures to stability of the lumbar spine-novel biomechanical insights.
脊柱结构对腰椎稳定性的生物力学贡献——新的生物力学见解。
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1705-1716. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.541. Epub 2020 May 28.
4
Balance Control in Patients with Subacute Non-Specific Low Back Pain, with and without Lumbar Instability: A Cross-Sectional Study.伴或不伴腰椎不稳的亚急性非特异性下腰痛患者的平衡控制:一项横断面研究
J Pain Res. 2020 Apr 23;13:795-803. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S232080. eCollection 2020.
5
Lumbar stability following graded unilateral and bilateral facetectomy: A finite element model study.分级单侧和双侧关节突切除术后腰椎稳定性:有限元模型研究。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 May;75:105011. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105011. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
6
Biomechanical Model Study of the Effect of Partial Facetectomy on Lumbar Stability Under Percutaneous Endoscopy.经皮内镜下部分椎板切除术对腰椎稳定性影响的生物力学模型研究
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:e255-e264. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.190. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
7
Predictors of Pain Recurrence After Lumbar Facet Joint Injections.腰椎小关节注射后疼痛复发的预测因素
Front Neurosci. 2019 Sep 20;13:958. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00958. eCollection 2019.
8
Strain of the facet joint capsule during rotation and translation range-of-motion tests: an in vitro porcine model as a human surrogate.在旋转和平移活动度测试中关节突关节囊的张力:一种作为人体替代物的体外猪模型。
Spine J. 2020 Mar;20(3):475-487. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.022. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
9
Reducing the extent of facetectomy may decrease morbidity in failed back surgery syndrome.减少关节突切除术的范围可能会降低失败的腰椎手术后综合征的发病率。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Aug 9;20(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2751-5.
10
The role of the facet capsular ligament in providing spinal stability.小关节囊韧带在提供脊柱稳定性方面的作用。
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2018 Oct;21(13):712-721. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2018.1514392.