• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Relative Deprivation: How Subjective Experiences of Income Inequality Influence Risk Preferences.相对剥夺感:收入不平等的主观体验如何影响风险偏好
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;15(4):425. doi: 10.3390/bs15040425.
2
Subjective relative deprivation is associated with poorer physical and mental health.主观相对剥夺感与较差的身心健康状况相关。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.030. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
3
Comparing aversions to outcome inequality and social risk in health and income: An empirical analysis using hypothetical scenarios with losses.比较健康和收入方面对结果不平等和社会风险的厌恶:使用具有损失的假设情景的实证分析
Health Econ. 2020 Jan;29(1):85-97. doi: 10.1002/hec.3974. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
4
How Wealth Inequality Affects Happiness: The Perspective of Social Comparison.财富不平等如何影响幸福感:社会比较视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 11;13:829707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.829707. eCollection 2022.
5
Individual Differences in Subjective Utility and Risk Preferences: The Influence of Hedonic Capacity and Trait Anxiety.主观效用和风险偏好中的个体差异:享乐能力和特质焦虑的影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2017 May 22;8:88. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00088. eCollection 2017.
6
Gender differences in sleep deprivation effects on risk and inequality aversion: evidence from an economic experiment.睡眠剥夺对风险和不平等厌恶影响的性别差异:来自一项经济实验的证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120029. eCollection 2015.
7
Does relative deprivation predict the need for mental health services?相对剥夺感能否预测心理健康服务需求?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2004 Dec;7(4):167-75.
8
Inequality aversion predicts support for public and private redistribution.不平等厌恶感预测了对公共和私人再分配的支持。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 24;121(39):e2401445121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401445121. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
9
Do social comparisons explain the association between income inequality and health?: Relative deprivation and perceived health among male and female Japanese individuals.社会比较能否解释收入不平等与健康之间的关联?:日本男性和女性中的相对剥夺感与健康认知
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Sep;67(6):982-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
10
Aversion to health inequality - Pure, income-related and income-caused.对健康不平等的厌恶——纯粹的、与收入相关的和由收入导致的。
J Health Econ. 2024 Mar;94:102856. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102856. Epub 2024 Jan 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Inequality and Risk-Taking.不平等与冒险行为。
Evol Psychol. 2015 Sep 1;13(3):1474704915596295. doi: 10.1177/1474704915596295.
2
Relative Deprivation and Hope: Predictors of Risk Behavior.相对剥夺感和希望:风险行为的预测因素。
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Sep;37(3):817-835. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09989-4. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
3
How does personal relative deprivation affect mental health among the older adults in China? Evidence from panel data analysis.个人相对剥夺如何影响中国老年人的心理健康?来自面板数据分析的证据。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.084. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
4
Comparing indices of relative deprivation using behavioural evidence.使用行为证据比较相对剥夺感指数。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;259:112914. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112914. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
Relative deprivation and suicide risk in South Korea.韩国的相对剥夺感与自杀风险
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan 22;247:112815. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112815.
6
Are Risk Preferences Stable?风险偏好是稳定的吗?
J Econ Perspect. 2018;32(2):135-54.
7
A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on.社会比较理论的 60 多年元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Feb;144(2):177-197. doi: 10.1037/bul0000127. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
Associations of relative deprivation and income rank with depressive symptoms among older adults in Japan.相对贫困和收入等级与日本老年人抑郁症状的关联。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;189:138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.028. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
9
Economic inequality increases risk taking.经济不平等会增加冒险行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 2;114(18):4643-4648. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616453114. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
10
Social comparison, personal relative deprivation, and materialism.社会比较、个人相对剥夺感与物质主义。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun;56(2):373-392. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12176. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

相对剥夺感:收入不平等的主观体验如何影响风险偏好

Relative Deprivation: How Subjective Experiences of Income Inequality Influence Risk Preferences.

作者信息

Pak Tae-Young

机构信息

Department of Consumer Science and Convergence Program for Social Innovation, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 03063, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;15(4):425. doi: 10.3390/bs15040425.

DOI:10.3390/bs15040425
PMID:40282046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12024019/
Abstract

Economic inequality has been linked to changes in individual risk-taking behavior, yet the underlying mechanisms remain underexplored. In this study, I examine whether feelings of relative deprivation from upward social comparisons influence risk preferences. In the randomized experiments, participants were exposed to false information feedback designed to evoke feelings of relative deprivation, and their risk aversion was assessed through hypothetical and incentivized gambles. The results indicate that exposure to relative deprivation reduced risk aversion among men in incentivized lottery experiments, while it had no significant association with risk aversion for either gender in hypothetical gambles. Additionally, relative deprivation lowered perceived social standing and increased anxiety and concerns about personal deservingness-emotional outcomes commonly associated with experiences of relative deprivation. This study provides suggestive evidence that social comparison may influence risk preferences among men through emotional changes and offers insights into how societal inequality affects individual preferences. These findings have important implications for policy interventions aimed at addressing economic disparities and their behavioral consequences.

摘要

经济不平等与个体冒险行为的变化有关,但潜在机制仍未得到充分探索。在本研究中,我考察了向上社会比较产生的相对剥夺感是否会影响风险偏好。在随机实验中,参与者接触旨在引发相对剥夺感的虚假信息反馈,并通过假设性和有激励措施的赌博来评估他们的风险厌恶程度。结果表明,在有激励措施的彩票实验中,接触相对剥夺感会降低男性的风险厌恶程度,而在假设性赌博中,它与任何性别的风险厌恶均无显著关联。此外,相对剥夺感降低了感知到的社会地位,并增加了焦虑以及对个人应得性的担忧——这些情绪结果通常与相对剥夺经历相关。本研究提供了启发性证据,表明社会比较可能通过情绪变化影响男性的风险偏好,并深入探讨了社会不平等如何影响个体偏好。这些发现对于旨在解决经济差距及其行为后果的政策干预具有重要意义。