• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对谁有效?从社会健康和交叉性视角审视欧洲痴呆症护理指南中的心理和社会干预建议

Effective for Whom? A Review of Psychological and Social Intervention Recommendations in European Dementia Care Guidelines Through the Lenses of Social Health and Intersectionality.

作者信息

Neal David, Bartels Sara Laureen, Berdai Chaouni Saloua, Caprioli Thais, Comas-Herrera Adelina, Chattat Rabih, Diaz Ana, Dröes Rose-Marie, Faulkner Thomas, Felding Simone Anna, Franco-Martin Manuel, Giebel Clarissa, Gonçalves-Pereira Manuel, Hesse Samira, Holmerova Iva, Koh Wei Qi, Mena Emily, Misonow Julia, Mkrtchyan Anahit, Müller Nicole, Roes Martina, van Rompuy Isabeau, Rymaszewska Joanna, Szcześniak Dorota, Thyrian Jochen René, de Vugt Marjolein, Walden Amy, Wolf-Ostermann Karin, Hopper Louise

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Alzheimer Centrum Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neurosciences Research Institute, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 2;15(4):457. doi: 10.3390/bs15040457.

DOI:10.3390/bs15040457
PMID:40282079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12023985/
Abstract

In dementia care, access to effective psychosocial interventions is often addressed by evidence-based guidelines for care providers. However, it is unclear if current guidelines consider personal characteristics that may impact intervention effectiveness. This study investigates if, and within what framing, dementia care guidelines in Europe address what is effective and for whom. A review of 47 guidelines from 12 European countries was conducted. Content analysis focused on (i) if guidelines recommended specific psychosocial interventions, and how guidelines referred to (ii) social health, (iii) the intersection of social positioning, and (iv) inequities in care or outcomes. Thirty-five guidelines (74%) recommended specific psychosocial interventions. Around half referenced aspects of social health and of intersectionality. Thirteen guidelines (28%) referenced inequities. Social health was not explicitly recognised as a mechanism of psychosocial interventions. Only age and comorbidity were consistently considered to impact interventions' effectiveness. Inequities were acknowledged to arise from within-country regional variations and individual economic status, but were not linked to (intersectional) individual societal positions such as sex and/or gender, sexuality, and/or religion. The results between European countries were heterogeneous. Current guidelines offer little insight into what works for whom. Policymakers and guideline developers should work with researchers, generating and translating evidence into policy.

摘要

在痴呆症护理中,护理提供者的循证指南常常涉及获得有效的心理社会干预措施的问题。然而,目前的指南是否考虑了可能影响干预效果的个人特征尚不清楚。本研究调查了欧洲的痴呆症护理指南是否以及在何种框架内阐述了什么是有效的干预措施以及对谁有效。对来自12个欧洲国家的47项指南进行了综述。内容分析聚焦于:(i)指南是否推荐了特定的心理社会干预措施,以及指南如何提及(ii)社会健康、(iii)社会定位的交叉点以及(iv)护理或结果方面的不公平现象。35项指南(74%)推荐了特定的心理社会干预措施。约一半的指南提及了社会健康和交叉性的某些方面。13项指南(28%)提及了不公平现象。社会健康并未被明确视为心理社会干预措施的一种机制。只有年龄和合并症被一致认为会影响干预效果。人们认识到不公平现象源于国内的地区差异和个人经济状况,但并未与性别和/或性取向、性倾向和/或宗教等(交叉性的)个人社会地位联系起来。欧洲国家之间的结果存在异质性。目前的指南对于什么对谁有效几乎没有提供什么见解。政策制定者和指南制定者应与研究人员合作,生成证据并将其转化为政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea32/12023985/a720acda8d20/behavsci-15-00457-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea32/12023985/a720acda8d20/behavsci-15-00457-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea32/12023985/a720acda8d20/behavsci-15-00457-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effective for Whom? A Review of Psychological and Social Intervention Recommendations in European Dementia Care Guidelines Through the Lenses of Social Health and Intersectionality.对谁有效?从社会健康和交叉性视角审视欧洲痴呆症护理指南中的心理和社会干预建议
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 2;15(4):457. doi: 10.3390/bs15040457.
2
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Protection against discrimination in national dementia guideline recommendations: A systematic review.防止国家痴呆症指南建议中的歧视:系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jan 11;19(1):e1003860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003860. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
Guidelines for psychosocial interventions in dementia care: a European survey and comparison.痴呆症照护中的心理社会干预指南:一项欧洲调查及比较。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;27(1):40-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.2687. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
6
Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Among at Risk Populations: Protocol for Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.高危人群中的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查:分布成本效益分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 30;14:e60488. doi: 10.2196/60488.
7
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis.城市绿地干预的环境、健康、福利、社会和公平影响:元叙述证据综合。
Environ Int. 2019 Sep;130:104923. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital assistive technologies for community-dwelling people with dementia: A systematic review of systematic reviews by the INTERDEM AI & assistive technology taskforce.针对社区痴呆症患者的数字辅助技术:INTERDEM人工智能与辅助技术特别工作组的系统评价的系统综述
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 3;11:20552076251362353. doi: 10.1177/20552076251362353. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
A new model to understand the complexity of inequalities in dementia.一种理解痴呆症中不平等现象复杂性的新模型。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Aug 14;23(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02245-w.
2
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission.《痴呆症的预防、干预与照护:柳叶刀常设委员会2024年报告》
Lancet. 2024 Aug 10;404(10452):572-628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01296-0. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
3
Considering inequities in national dementia strategies: breadth, depth, and scope.考虑国家痴呆症策略中的不平等:广度、深度和范围。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Apr 16;23(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02166-8.
4
What influences life expectancy in people with dementia? Social support as an emerging protective factor.哪些因素影响痴呆症患者的预期寿命?社会支持作为一个新出现的保护因素。
Age Ageing. 2024 Mar 1;53(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae044.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Lecanemab for Individuals With Early-Stage Alzheimer Disease.仑卡奈单抗治疗早期阿尔茨海默病患者的成本效益分析
Neurology. 2024 Apr 9;102(7):e209218. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209218. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
6
A scoping review of equity-focused implementation theories, models and frameworks in healthcare and their application in addressing ethnicity-related health inequities.卫生保健中以公平为重点的实施理论、模型和框架的范围综述及其在解决与族裔有关的健康不平等问题中的应用。
Implement Sci. 2023 Oct 16;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01304-0.
7
The affordability of lecanemab, an amyloid-targeting therapy for Alzheimer's disease: an EADC-EC viewpoint.用于治疗阿尔茨海默病的淀粉样蛋白靶向疗法——lecanemab的可负担性:欧洲阿尔茨海默病临床医生俱乐部(EADC)和欧洲临床药理学会(EC)的观点
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 May 22;29:100657. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100657. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
A critical analysis of national dementia care guidances.对国家痴呆症护理指南的批判性分析。
Health Policy. 2023 Apr;130:104736. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104736. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
9
Recognition of social health: A conceptual framework in the context of dementia research.社会健康的认知:痴呆症研究背景下的概念框架。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 15;13:1052009. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1052009. eCollection 2022.
10
Differential diagnostic performance of a panel of plasma biomarkers for different types of dementia.一组血浆生物标志物对不同类型痴呆的鉴别诊断性能。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2022 May 15;14(1):e12285. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12285. eCollection 2022.