文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

针对社区痴呆症患者的数字辅助技术:INTERDEM人工智能与辅助技术特别工作组的系统评价的系统综述

Digital assistive technologies for community-dwelling people with dementia: A systematic review of systematic reviews by the INTERDEM AI & assistive technology taskforce.

作者信息

Neal David, Craven Michael P, Cross Jane, Evans Shirley, Fox Christopher, Oksnebjerg Laila, Alexandre Isabel, Aryankhesal Aidin, Astell Arlene, Begde Ahmet, Ditton Annabel, Engelsma Thomas, Gregersen Rikke, Heins Pascale, Hogervorst Eef, Kafadar Aysegul Humeyra, Poos Jackie, Robinson Louise, Sezgin Duygu, Smaling Hanneke Ja, Szczesniak Dorota, Tan Josephine Rose Orejana, de Vugt Marjolein, Meiland Franka Jm

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

NIHR MindTech HealthTech Research Centre & Centre for Dementia, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Nottingham UK.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2025 Aug 3;11:20552076251362353. doi: 10.1177/20552076251362353. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.


DOI:10.1177/20552076251362353
PMID:40761778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12319280/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of digital assistive technologies by and for people living with dementia is promising for supporting social health and advocated as a partial solution to growing prevalence worldwide. A state-of-the-art position paper published in 2017 identified challenges regarding digital assistive technologies, around five themes: development, usability, (cost-)effectiveness, implementation and ethics. This systematic review summarizes progress on the challenges found in 2017, and persisting or emerging challenges. METHODS: A systematic review of systematic reviews was conducted, focused on studies published after 2016. The inclusion criteria required that the target group included, at least in part, people with dementia living in the community and that the technologies aimed to support social health. For the five themes, literature searches were conducted in Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase databases. RESULTS: A total of 112 reviews were included, covering various applications such as smart homes, care robots, exergaming and everyday technologies. No applications of artificial intelligence were included. The challenges included personalization of applications (development); limited use of standardized methods (usability); insufficient quantity and quality of randomized controlled trials (cost-effectiveness); overly high expectations of assistive technologies (implementation); and the need for more equitable access to technologies (ethics). CONCLUSION: Much research has been conducted since the 2017 state of the art position paper. While some challenges identified at that time remain relevant, others have been addressed, and new challenges have emerged. Future research should prioritize emerging artificial intelligence applications; the development of integrated assistive technologies; evaluation using robust methods and meaningful outcomes; and the promotion of more accessible and inclusive technologies.

摘要

引言:痴呆症患者使用数字辅助技术以及为他们开发此类技术,对于促进社会健康很有前景,并被倡导作为应对全球患病率不断上升的部分解决方案。2017年发表的一篇前沿立场文件确定了数字辅助技术在五个主题方面的挑战:开发、可用性、(成本)效益、实施和伦理。本系统评价总结了2017年发现的挑战方面的进展,以及持续存在或新出现的挑战。 方法:对系统评价进行了系统评价,重点关注2016年之后发表的研究。纳入标准要求目标群体至少部分包括居住在社区的痴呆症患者,且技术旨在支持社会健康。针对这五个主题,在医学期刊数据库(Medline)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)和荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)中进行了文献检索。 结果:共纳入112篇综述,涵盖智能家居、护理机器人、运动游戏和日常技术等各种应用。未纳入人工智能的应用。挑战包括应用的个性化(开发);标准化方法使用有限(可用性);随机对照试验的数量和质量不足(成本效益);对辅助技术期望过高(实施);以及需要更公平地获取技术(伦理)。 结论:自2017年前沿立场文件发布以来,已经开展了大量研究。虽然当时确定的一些挑战仍然相关,但其他一些挑战已经得到解决,并且出现了新的挑战。未来的研究应优先考虑新兴的人工智能应用;集成辅助技术的开发;使用可靠方法和有意义结果进行评估;以及推广更易获取和更具包容性的技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e00/12319280/d609878ab7f4/10.1177_20552076251362353-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e00/12319280/d609878ab7f4/10.1177_20552076251362353-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e00/12319280/d609878ab7f4/10.1177_20552076251362353-fig1.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Digital assistive technologies for community-dwelling people with dementia: A systematic review of systematic reviews by the INTERDEM AI & assistive technology taskforce.

Digit Health. 2025-8-3

[2]
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-5-23

[3]
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-7-28

[4]
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[5]
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].

Epidemiol Prev. 2013

[6]
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of low-intensity psychological interventions for the secondary prevention of relapse after depression: a systematic review.

Health Technol Assess. 2012-5

[7]
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.

Health Technol Assess. 2025-6-25

[8]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19

[9]
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Health Technol Assess. 2012

[10]
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.

Health Technol Assess. 2012-12

本文引用的文献

[1]
What are the unmet needs in people affected by dementia? A scoping review of reviews.

Aging Ment Health. 2025-7-23

[2]
Effective for Whom? A Review of Psychological and Social Intervention Recommendations in European Dementia Care Guidelines Through the Lenses of Social Health and Intersectionality.

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025-4-2

[3]
Ethics in digital phenotyping: considerations regarding Alzheimer's disease, speech and artificial intelligence.

J Med Ethics. 2025-1-31

[4]
A future role for health applications of large language models depends on regulators enforcing safety standards.

Lancet Digit Health. 2024-9

[5]
Making Co-Design More Responsible: Case Study on the Development of an AI-Based Decision Support System in Dementia Care.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2024-7-31

[6]
The acceptability and effectiveness of eHealth interventions to support assessment and decision-making for people with dementia living in care homes: A systematic review.

Front Dement. 2022-9-13

[7]
Personalized interactive multimedia systems to support meaningful activities in dementia care: A systematic review To be published in: Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics.

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2024-12

[8]
A systematic review of digital access to post-diagnostic health and social care services for dementia.

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024-7

[9]
Non-pharmacological interventions in the management of dementia-related psychosis.

Br J Gen Pract. 2024-6-20

[10]
Usability of web-based tools designed for communication and decision-making in dementia: Systematic review and design brief.

Int J Med Inform. 2024-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索