• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不确定性下的健康决策:阴谋论信念与制度信任的作用

Health Decisions Under Uncertainty: The Roles of Conspiracy Beliefs and Institutional Trust.

作者信息

Atad Erga

机构信息

Lauder School of Government, Reichman University, Herzliya 4610101, Israel.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 14;15(4):524. doi: 10.3390/bs15040524.

DOI:10.3390/bs15040524
PMID:40282145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12023932/
Abstract

Research on vaccination hesitancy has been extensive, but the role of information processing in decision making still needs to be explored. The study examines the alignment between parents' COVID-19 vaccination intentions and actual behavior, focusing on the impact of different kinds of information processing on the consistency or inconsistency of these behaviors. It analyzes parents' reliance on health information sources, and education levels, with institutional trust, ability to critically evaluate conspiracy theories and scientific knowledge as moderators. A total of 1118 Israeli parents participated in digital surveys and were classified into the following 4 groups based on their initial vaccination intentions and actual behaviors: (1) consistent-pro-vaccine and vaccinated; (2) inconsistent-pro-vaccine but unvaccinated; (3) inconsistent-anti-vaccine but vaccinated; and (4) consistent-anti-vaccine and unvaccinated). The results show that consistent parents process information using system 1, i.e., heuristic information processing, reliance on health information sources, moderated by institutional trust and education. However, inconsistent parents used systems 1 and 2, namely heuristic-systematic information processing, influenced by knowledge of COVID-19 and the ability to assess conspiracy theories critically.

摘要

关于疫苗犹豫的研究已经很广泛,但信息处理在决策中的作用仍有待探索。该研究考察了父母对新冠疫苗接种的意愿与实际行为之间的一致性,重点关注不同类型的信息处理对这些行为一致性或不一致性的影响。研究分析了父母对健康信息来源的依赖程度、教育水平,以及机构信任、批判性评估阴谋论的能力和科学知识作为调节因素的作用。共有1118名以色列父母参与了数字调查,并根据他们最初的疫苗接种意愿和实际行为被分为以下4组:(1)支持疫苗接种且已接种;(2)支持疫苗接种但未接种;(3)反对疫苗接种但已接种;(4)反对疫苗接种且未接种。结果表明,态度一致的父母使用系统1进行信息处理,即启发式信息处理,对健康信息来源的依赖程度受机构信任和教育的调节。然而,态度不一致的父母使用系统1和系统2,即启发式-系统性信息处理,受新冠知识和批判性评估阴谋论能力的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2664/12023932/d2a76b4a0856/behavsci-15-00524-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2664/12023932/f038d03c16f4/behavsci-15-00524-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2664/12023932/ce286fa123e4/behavsci-15-00524-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2664/12023932/b4da7d1b5b5a/behavsci-15-00524-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2664/12023932/d2a76b4a0856/behavsci-15-00524-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2664/12023932/f038d03c16f4/behavsci-15-00524-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2664/12023932/ce286fa123e4/behavsci-15-00524-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2664/12023932/b4da7d1b5b5a/behavsci-15-00524-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2664/12023932/d2a76b4a0856/behavsci-15-00524-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Health Decisions Under Uncertainty: The Roles of Conspiracy Beliefs and Institutional Trust.不确定性下的健康决策:阴谋论信念与制度信任的作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 14;15(4):524. doi: 10.3390/bs15040524.
2
A social norms approach intervention to address misperceptions of anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs amongst UK parents.一种社会规范方法干预措施,旨在解决英国父母对抗疫苗阴谋信念的误解。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 12;16(11):e0258985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258985. eCollection 2021.
3
COVID-19 Parental Vaccine Hesitancy: The Role of Trust in Science and Conspiracy Beliefs.COVID-19 父母疫苗犹豫:对科学和阴谋论信仰的信任的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 5;21(11):1471. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21111471.
4
The Mediating Roles of Attitude Toward COVID-19 Vaccination, Trust in Science and Trust in Government in the Relationship Between Anti-vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs and Vaccination Intention.对新冠疫苗接种的态度、对科学的信任和对政府的信任在反疫苗阴谋论与接种意愿关系中的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:936917. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936917. eCollection 2022.
5
Coronavirus conspiracy suspicions, general vaccine attitudes, trust and coronavirus information source as predictors of vaccine hesitancy among UK residents during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠病毒阴谋论怀疑、一般疫苗态度、信任和新冠病毒信息来源对英国居民在 COVID-19 大流行期间疫苗犹豫的预测。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(1):236-247. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001434. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
6
Links between conspiracy beliefs, vaccine knowledge, and trust: Anti-vaccine behavior of Serbian adults.阴谋论信念、疫苗知识与信任之间的联系:塞尔维亚成年人的反疫苗行为
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113930. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113930. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
7
Institutional trust, conspiracy beliefs and Covid-19 vaccine uptake and hesitancy among adults in Ghana.加纳成年人中的机构信任、阴谋论观念与新冠疫苗接种及犹豫态度
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Oct 16;4(10):e0003852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003852. eCollection 2024.
8
The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions.反疫苗阴谋论对疫苗接种意愿的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 20;9(2):e89177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089177. eCollection 2014.
9
- the relevance of emotions and intuition for parental vaccine conspiracy beliefs and vaccination uptake.情绪和直觉与父母疫苗阴谋信仰和疫苗接种率的相关性。
Psychol Health. 2020 May;35(5):538-554. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1673894. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
10
Correlates of COVID-19 vaccination intentions: Attitudes, institutional trust, fear, conspiracy beliefs, and vaccine skepticism.新冠疫苗接种意愿的相关因素:态度、机构信任、恐惧、阴谋论信仰和疫苗怀疑论。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jun;302:114981. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114981. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The Resilience of Attitude Toward Vaccination: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial on the Processing of Misinformation.对疫苗接种态度的恢复力:关于错误信息处理的网络随机对照试验
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 4;8:e52871. doi: 10.2196/52871.
2
Share If You Believe, Comment If You Doubt: The Effect of Source of Information, Trust, and Belief in Conspiracy Theories on Engagement with Facebook Posts.如果你相信就分享,如果你怀疑就评论:信息来源、信任以及对阴谋论的信念对脸书帖子参与度的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 3;14(8):673. doi: 10.3390/bs14080673.
3
Behavioral Beliefs Predict Recommended Behaviors, Especially When Trust in Public Health Sources is Low: Evidence from a Longitudinal Study of Three COVID-19 Prevention Behaviors Among U.S. Adults.
行为信念预测推荐行为,尤其是当公众对公共卫生机构的信任度较低时:来自美国成年人三种 COVID-19 预防行为的纵向研究证据。
J Health Commun. 2024 Jan 2;29(1):9-19. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2023.2278615. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
4
Effects of Message Framing and Narrative Format on Promoting Persuasive Conversations with Others About the Flu Vaccine.信息框架和叙述格式对促进与他人就流感疫苗进行说服性对话的影响。
Health Commun. 2024 Sep;39(10):2110-2122. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2257427. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
5
The role of conspiracy mindset in reducing support for child vaccination for COVID-19 in the United States.阴谋心态在美国减少对新冠病毒儿童疫苗接种支持方面所起的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 13;14:1175571. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1175571. eCollection 2023.
6
Parents' Willingness to Vaccinate Children for COVID-19: Conspiracy Theories, Information Sources, and Perceived Responsibility.家长愿意为儿童接种 COVID-19 疫苗:阴谋论、信息来源和感知责任。
J Health Commun. 2023 Jan 2;28(1):15-27. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2023.2172107. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
7
Black-and-white thinking and conspiracy beliefs prevent parents from vaccinating their children against COVID-19.黑白思维和阴谋论观念阻碍了父母让孩子接种新冠疫苗。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2022 Sep 21. doi: 10.1002/acp.3999.
8
Vaccination against COVID-19 reduces virus-related fears: Findings from a German longitudinal study.接种 COVID-19 疫苗可降低与病毒相关的恐惧:来自德国纵向研究的发现。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;10:878787. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.878787. eCollection 2022.
9
Misinformation of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine hesitancy.新冠疫苗错误信息和疫苗犹豫。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 11;12(1):13681. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17430-6.
10
Infodemic, Institutional Trust, and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-National Survey.信息疫情、机构信任与 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫:一项跨国调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;19(13):8033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138033.